Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Saturday, 7th November 2009 Change Date

Caltongate development: 'The Capital is in sore need of new investment'

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 May 2009
NEWS that the controversial Caltongate development is alive once more will not be met with universal delight.
The same people who worried about the impact on the Old Town's heritage will be ready to take to the barricades once again. Most probably thought the battle had been won by default, when developers Mountgrange Capital went into administration two mon
ths ago.

But two of the firm's directors, Manish Chande and Martin Myers, are back with Mountgrange Investment Management LLP. They say they have at least the £300 million needed for the project, and more.

They won't confirm what they'll do with the money, but sources say they see Caltongate as unfinished business. They want to buy back the site and push ahead with the plans which have already been approved, saving time and the cost of a new application.

Given that Mountgrange Capital blamed the four years that its original ideas spent in planning limbo, this could be key to whether or not the revived proposals now go ahead.

There are still many hurdles, not least the Bank of Scotland. Owed £73.8m by Mountgrange Capital, the bank has already asked receivers Deloitte not to sell the Caltongate site for a year, in the hope that its value will rise. Once £45m, it is about half that today.

There will also be the revived protests of those who opposed the scheme for a new hotel, shops, offices and homes. Those voices must continue to be heard, but one advantage of the years it took to secure planning permission is that the impact was rigorously tested by both the council and the Scottish Government.

The bottom line is that the city is in sore need of new investment – and this one could generate 2,000 jobs. Meanwhile, a gap site sits idle and ugly in the heart of the Capital. Good luck to the new bid; Caltongate's hope is Edinburgh's too.

'No to nanny statism'
IT SAYS much for MSP Angela Constance that she decided to see Scotland's alcohol problem at first-hand by riding shotgun on an ambulance one night in West Lothian.

An ex-social worker, Ms Constance doubtless already knew the terrible toll of booze. But where her arguments fall down is when she trots out the SNP party line. Big stick sanctions which punish the law-abiding majority as well as the troublemaking minority – such as minimum pricing and a ban on off-sales for under-21s – are nanny statism and are not the answer.



The full article contains 428 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 May 2009 9:19 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Caltongate development
 
1

Old Town Resident,

edinburgh 25/05/2009 10:01:02
what a laugh, who wrote this? Mark, Manish or Donald?
2

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 25/05/2009 12:33:30
#1, yep, all the hallmarks of a kite-flying press release. Why should the same individuals who let this scheme go down the pan last time be given a second chance, especially as they don't have the benefit of their cronies; Anderson, Davies and their cast of intellectual pygmies at the City Chambers any more.
3

mad moo,

edinburgh 25/05/2009 19:07:34
Oh dear Scotsman publications not quite up to date with things as usual....see
http://www.sundayherald.com/business/businessnews/display.var.2509980.0.breakdown_of_caltongate_marriage.php
4

Buttress,

25/05/2009 22:31:35
Alive once more? Not according to that other press report from yesterday!

But those responsible have certainly not been idle, that's for sure. Bet they haven't paid the rent on the tenements though.

However, they can't go ahead and build Caltongate, as they don't own the site which is in the hands of the receiver, and don't own certain of the land and buildings either which CEC still owns.

It's also not true that the plans spent four years in planning limbo, but then that's the EEN for you. It may have taken four years from site purchase, but that wasn't because of planning limbo.

And apparently there are others ready to buy the site. They can't build 'Caltongate', though.

Nor was the impact rigourously tested by the government, there are still many questions to be answered over that. Freedom of Information requests bring out useful documents.

And we have the UNESCO report to come. Initial reports in the press are that it's damning of Caltongate.




 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Should the Old Town’s Caltongate development be revived in its original form?
Yes, it was an innovative and stylish proposal
No, it was not in fitting with the Old Town
Yes, but it needs to be done more cheaply

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.