Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Wednesday, 4th November 2009 Change Date Latest Issue

Anderson's parting shot at 'communist planners'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
25 August 2006
OUTGOING council leader Donald Anderson has accused city planning officials of having "a communist streak" and trying to stop anything new and colourful being created in Edinburgh.
Senior planning officials opposed initial plans to close the Royal Mile for "garish" street entertainment during the Fringe, he said, and repeatedly raised petty objections to the colour of shop signs and buildings.

Grey was the only colour some planning officers found acceptable, Councillor Anderson said.

He admitted he had wanted to sack some of them after they spent two years creating designs for bins for the city centre - which turned out to be "virtually useless". The council leader vented his frustration as he prepares to hand over the reins next week after seven years leading the local authority.

Union officials accused him of taking "a cheap shot" at public employees who could not defend themselves, and suggested politicians created many of the problems faced by city officials.

But Cllr Anderson said he felt attitudes had to change in order to stop the future development of the city being harmed.

The worst example of the problem had been the attempt to introduce new litter bins in the city centre three years ago after months of debate, he said. The council was forced to ditch dozens of cast irons bins because they got jammed by pizza boxes and filled up quicker than they could be emptied.

"It was the one issue on which I wish we'd had the power to sack officials. It was unbelievable," said Cllr Anderson. "We spent ages arguing over the colour and design of these bins and then it turned out they couldn't be used.

"I have great admiration for many people in our planning department. However, there is a communist streak in some of them that won't allow the introduction of anything to our streets that is visible and are happy for things to be any colour as long as that colour is grey. We've not got the balance right in what is a modern city."

The departing leader, who intends to stand for the Scottish Parliament next May, said he had suffered "immense frustration" in dealings with some officials over the past seven years.

He also criticised officers in the council's transport and development departments. It was "ridiculous" it had taken the council more than four years to develop plans to brighten up roundabouts in the city by getting companies to help pay for flower displays in return for sponsorship, he said.

He also criticised officials for failing to acknowledge things had gone badly wrong when they overhauled the traffic layout in the city centre last year.

Some "industrial language" had been used in exchanges with senior officers as the controversy raged over the impact on motorists in areas like George Street and the West End, the council leader said.

"The main problem was no-one was prepared to admit they were wrong, and that any changes needed to be made. A real weak point in the city development department is that although our officials appear to hear what shopkeepers and retailers say, they don't listen to them.

"As a council it's vital we get right behind our retailers."

John Stevenson, the city council representative for public sector union Unison, said: "Employees of the council are not allowed to respond directly to criticism to the media, so this is a pretty cheap shot if they can't answer back.

"The council has a history of barnstorming through ideas that politicians have not thought through properly and our officials have had to pick up. I can't remember the last politician to admit they ever got anything wrong."

Council chief executive Tom Aitchison declined to comment today.

Page 1 of 1

 
1

Dave007,

Edinburgh 25/08/2006 11:32:23

Its a bit late as a departing council leader to make these comment. The cynical might suppose these are being made to distance himself from the diabolical with a view to a place at Holyrood. Speaking of diabolical, surly no one will vote for him.

2

H,

Edinburgh 25/08/2006 11:33:29

Anderson is right. The planning dept is raping this fine city. What is happening in North Edinburgh will ensure that it will grind to a halt. Too many flats, too close togetther and seemingly designed by Ceausescu. Little green space. When was the last time this council built a park?

Travelling along Lower Granton Road is impossible at the moment - what will happen in 3 years time with another 1500 cars in the area? Of course Andrew 'Baldrick' Burns will come up with another of his cunning plans. Gawd 'elp us.

3

Kilmartin,

City Centre 25/08/2006 11:52:37

Anyone who has had even minor dealings with the city council will know that it is a huge, inefficient apparatus with virtually no accountability at a political or personal level. The decision making process at council executive level is virtually geological - mountain ranges rise and fall before a decision is taken on whether we should have a new sign on the High Street...

Anderson's comments ring true for me - doubtless a majority of council employees work hard and are proud of their work, but there are individuals at all levels who are at best coasting, and at worst are actively avoiding their duty to the council tax payers in the city.

It is one of the great ironies of local government that the elected representatives are held at the mercy of the council executive employees who may not agree with the political agenda, and subsequently throw up as many obstacles as possible to make life difficult for their political 'masters'.

4

Graeme F,

Edinburgh 25/08/2006 11:55:01

He's right, but I agree with David in that it's a bit late to be saying so now. When he was Leader he might have been in a position to do something, but shouting from the sidelines isn't going to help anyone.

The City Planners have a lot to hang their heads in shame about. And the so-called heritage groups which try to water down visionary proposals and retain the status quo of ugly 1960s developments are no better. How anyone could believe that the New Street/Canongate area was fine the way it was, and why a modern hotel development on the site of the former Lothian Region offices is less preferable to the ugly, neglected and soulless structure which now sits festering on one of Edinburgh's most beautiful boulevards - well, it's beyond me!

5

Koffindodger,

Edinburgh 25/08/2006 11:55:07

"the bins, the bins". I bet the correspondence wrt this between nimbies, their pet cooncillors and the cooncil would choke a dozen wheelie bins.

How do other cities all over the world manage, oh, I know, they just say "shut it, here's your bin, if you don't like it discuss it with the bin man"

6

MOAI VINCENT'S COUSIN,

Edinburgh 25/08/2006 11:59:08

No, sorry, can't let that pass.

What a complete hypocrite Mr Anderson is. He is known to be little more than a bully in the Council and his attitude towards some Council staff has been disgraceful. How Council staff are going to work with him until his departure in May is beyond me but he has shown himself for the ambitious, unfair egotist that he is.

His administration has been marked by a determination to bulldoze through ideas, eg, the traffic management scheme/congestion without listening to the advice being given to him by officials (who are paid to give their professional advice on such matters) on what needs to happen to make such schemes successful.

That he now takes a parting shot at the very people who have done their best to point out the shortfalls in his policy, despite his refusal to listen, is quite unbelievable. I have nothing but sympathy for the very many officials who try their utmost to implement good schemes, despite the pig-headedness and constant mind-changing of councillors.

It is a great pity that those officials are not permitted a right of reply to such accusations but this is what they get for not standing firm against ignorant councillors and ensuring that sensible policies are implemented for the public good and not just to appease arrogant, tyranical councillors! Learn the lesson, officials: it is the public who pay for your professional opinion. When egotisical politicians come along with silly ideas, stand up for the public and explain why they are not a good idea.
Perhaps then we can see sensible projects being delivered in this city on time and on budget.

7

Ted,

25/08/2006 12:18:01

Simon, you're either deluded or an architect working for Mountgrange if you think another soul-less hotel and executive housing complex is an improvement on the current Canongate. If you want to live in a new town, move to Milton Keynes, and let those of us who appreciate this city stay here.

8

everything you do is probably a Balloon,

25/08/2006 12:19:42

Privatise the Cooncil. Nationalise Transport.

Nobody loses their job.

9

Graeme F,

Edinburgh 25/08/2006 12:27:25

And I would suggest that anyone who wants to live in a museum move to The Louvre!

There is surely a balance to be struck between addressing the needs of a modern, dynamic world city and retaining architectural heritage. Retaining a dilapidated crumbling old bus station is in nobody's interest!

10

MOAI VINCENT'S COUSIN,

Edinburgh 25/08/2006 12:35:25

MA (8) - there was a time when it was the Council departments which were responsible for the highest standards in construction projects.

They ensured that schemes were delivered which were for the public good; were to a high standard and fit to last for decades; and they would not allow private companies employed by them to cut corners by using shoddy materials so that company could maximise their profit. Sometimes those projects did go over budget and were delayed but, at the end of the day, the schemes were built to good standards and were there for the right reasons.

Now we have a situation where it has become fashionable to set up "arms-length Council-owned" companies instead, eg, the deplorable TIE. These companies are free from Council pay structures and their staff earn hugely higher salaries than their equivalent in the Council. They set their own deadlines/targets and pick up bonuses whether they meet those deadlines/targets or not. And, at the end of the day, they are not publicly accountable as they are, in theory, under the control of the Council.

There are a great many Council employees who are highly qualified and deeply committed to the city and who have decided to stay with the Council, rather than move to the likes of TIE, because they want to do a good job for the right reasons. The recently publicised performance of TIE is a good example of how these quangos are not representing either good value for money or a higher level of expertise.

What we need is the replacement of some of our current Senior Officials by people who are prepared to stand up to politicians with silly ideas and get back to delivering high-quality projects by the people who care.

11

Gordon Zola,

Old Town 25/08/2006 12:45:48

Lety me get this right. All of his ideas were good but they were screwed up by civil servants and that wasn't his fault, even though he was in charge.

He's basically claiming to be one of the good guys, when just about everyone knows he's one of the bad guys. Exactly what has he done that would be worth anyone's thanks?

12

Yogi,

25/08/2006 12:46:04

Am I the only person who confuses Nicola Sturgeon with Wendy Alexander?
When I see Wendy's trout pout I keep thinking sturgeon.

13

Gordon Zola,

Dean Village 25/08/2006 12:56:19

Does anyone know why camels don't have any vocal cords?

14

Yogi,

25/08/2006 12:58:57

Planning Q - What are the 39 Steps?

15

everything you do is probably a Balloon,

25/08/2006 13:01:00

I take your point Jane. Sigh , I dont know the answer. Are we simply short of cash in our country ? is that the problem?

Whats going on , I just dont knowl

16

Gordon Zola,

Morningside 25/08/2006 13:25:20

The only reason we're short of cash in this country is the pollies keep wasting it on parliaments (£431M & counting...) , tram consultants (£60M+) and other vanity projects of no benefit to the public whatsover.

Which brings us back to Councillor Anderson. With his record of abject failure, who does he think will vote for him?

17

MOAI VINCENT'S COUSIN,

Edinburgh 25/08/2006 13:29:13

MA (15) - The problem is that we have been taken over by politicians who are not prepared to admit to a mistake or be held accountable for anything.

It is the Councillors who choose a Chief Executive and it is they who collectively appoint Directors of Council Departments. That is, they put their poodles in the positions of authority. It is now written into the contracts of employment of council staff that they are to help "implement policy". That means that, no matter how completely ill-advised a Councillor's idea may be, the officials, not matter how senior, are now also obliged to help implement it!

They can try their hardest to explain to councillors what the problems are and how to address them and they can give their professional opinion - most of them do as that is what they are paid for. If the councillors choose to ignore that advice, as in the case of CETM and congestion charging, then it should be the councillors (who after all voted in favour of those schemes) who take the responsibility. It is completely unacceptable for Donald Anderson to blame officials for things that he and his colleagues planned and then voted for, despite advice given to them.

Senior Directors should be employed solely on the basis of their previous experience and expertise. They should not be put in post by numpty politicians who just want them to implement numpty policies and then take the blame for them when it all goes wrong.

Bad man, Donald Anderson.

18

everything you do is probably a Balloon,

25/08/2006 13:47:20

I am at a loss as to what to do. I think im going to cry.

19

Gordon Zola,

Dunoon 25/08/2006 13:52:21

there's one problem we can fix. Pub takings are down because of the smoking ban, evidently. Let's all go for a drink!

20

Ricky,

the countryside 25/08/2006 13:58:14

Smacks of job worthism to me - wait until you are safely through your term as leader - bank your salary paid for by the public - don’t rock the boat - then wham! - ‘It wisnae me it wiz him‘ - a trait or virtue that cannot be held in high esteem in my opinion.

Typical of ‘Trust me I’m a politician’ aspirations. Eh?

21

MOAI VINCENT'S COUSIN,

Edinburgh 25/08/2006 14:05:07

MA (19) - Pass me the tissue box, too!

22

Gordon Zola,

25/08/2006 14:12:37

No, this moustache really doesn't suit me.

23

everything you do is probably a Balloon,

25/08/2006 14:32:32

Hoi , no copying peoples names ...... erm.

Lets meet in the meadows, drink cider and discuss trams.

24

everything you do is probably a Balloon,

25/08/2006 14:48:42

S'funny . I was thinking of standing as a councillor or (even easier considering the zeitgeist concerning our Polish immgrants) as an SMEP.

I mean , how hard can it be?

25

Thomas the Tank,

Edinburgh 25/08/2006 15:18:59

Perhaps if Fuhrer Anderson had actually READ some of the Council papers his hard working officials had put in front of him, before he and his colleagues voted on the '4 Legs good, 2 Legs Baaad' principle, he wouldn't be reduced to hurling pathetic abuse as he's finally dragged from the stage. It's well known in Council circles that anything more than a single page report to cooncillors is a complete waste, better if it's got a Nice Coloured Picture (Happy shiny people but no horrid Cars!). Just as an example, HE sold the City the utter shambles of CETM, along with 'Stan Laurel' Burns, but they were both too stupid to realise they were being manipulated (along the lines of the Emperor's New Clothes') by ambitious but unscrupulous interests within City Development.

26

Kristina,

25/08/2006 15:22:53

MA 26 - or any one else thinking about it - re standing as an independent candidate in 2007, please get in touch via 2007@kristina.org.uk

27

sc_uk,

25/08/2006 15:27:05

He won't get voted in because of his dashing looks, that's for sure.

28

WestPilton,

guess 25/08/2006 15:33:37

Simon, I agree that that building is an eye-sore, but remember it was a nice new modern development at one point. Something does need to be built there, but it needs to be something that compliments the architecture around it.

29

Anti-taxi Anti-tram,

Buckstone 25/08/2006 15:59:16

Is it me or does Mr Anderson look like 'Q' (John DeLancy) from Star Trek Next Gen in the picture above?... He was another one that could not take responsibility for his own actions and blamed other folk for the mess made. Wake up to the real world Mr Ande'Q'son... you had the job as Leader and you blew it. Overpaid, over confident and over the hill. Frustratingly the new Council Leader is still backing the Trams. Next thing we need is him turning around and shelving it and quickly to back stab Mr Ande'Q'son's effort to gain MSPship.

30

Synchronicity,

25/08/2006 16:18:20

bet this guys leaving party will be fun :-D

31

Thomas the Tank,

EmbraToon 25/08/2006 16:48:25

Your readers with a memory span longer than the average goldfish (that Anderson and the rest of his small-town, political nonentity crew assume of the gullible electorate) (OK-or with access to the Evening News Archive) might recall that this is by no means the first time that this arrogant bully has lashed out in all directions at those professionals who've tried to warn him against his own stupidity. For example, back on the 9 November 2005, an EN report had Anderson castigating not only his own officials, in the most improper terms, but also the Scottish Executive, for not stopping the utter folly of The Idiot Burns' CETM, which The Leader also endorsed. Some people might also remember he got such a kicking about Burns' Cunning Plan from a group of traders in the William Street Area that he went back to the Kremlin (sorry, City Chambers) in such a blind panic that he forced some officials to revoke - illegally- parts of the order on the spot. Well, they tried to but with his blustering they made a total mess of the procedure and cost the Council Taxpayer an extra £300 or so to re-do it. When they were challenged on it, the Chief Executive, no less, lied in a Freedom of Information request. This is a VERY serious matter, and I still have the evidence for that nice Mr Dunnion. Altogether, not a very nice man at all, and one the Electorate of Embra (South) should steer WELL clear of next May!

32

MOAI VINCENT'S COUSIN,

Edinburgh 25/08/2006 17:26:25

Rick (34) - what did you do about the appalling Chief Executive?

I ask because a senior MSP also misled a parliamentary committee regarding "the value for money aspect" of the tram scheme but the avenues for taking a complaint against that MSP appear to be very limited and have to be made to "toothless" organisations. Do you know of anyone with enough clout to make the likes of the Chief Executive, etc, accountable for their dishonesty?

33

Rod,

Kirkliston - European Village Jewel 25/08/2006 18:22:03

Mr Anderson might do well to reflect on a previous council leader, the cretinous Keith Geddes, who resigned his seat for a comfortable life in the (then) new Scottish Parliament.
I was at the count. Poor Keith. His jaw dropped faster than an anvil from a cliff. Did I laugh? Too b****y right I did!
I dare say that Keith later found an agreeable publicly funded trough in which to exercise his snout.

34

I was just thinking,

25/08/2006 19:05:35

Anderson wished he had the power to sack incompetents. He is truly speaking for the residents of Edinburgh on that one.
He, along with others would have been gone a long time ago if sacking were not now a thing of the past.

Resignation is no longer required by those who hold public office and commit gross acts of incompetence or waste huge amounts of public money.
Ask Councillor Burns.

35

Ricky,

cheesetown 25/08/2006 20:03:33

He’s Going?

Jolly well Huzzah Blackadder!

36

shooter,

25/08/2006 21:02:58

edinburgh cityCouncil a wast of time and money everything thay do is gross acts of incompetence Mr Anderson is the head one
beem me up scotty.

37

MOAI VINCENT'S COUSIN,

Edinburgh 25/08/2006 22:41:05

What a cheek Anderson has! If anyone in the Council has "a communist streak", it has been himself, acting like a mini-Stalin.

He was the man in charge for seven years and he has to take full responsibility for all those below him. Whenever he shouted (frequently), people would ask "how high?", as he was reknowned as a bully.

Council officials cannot defend themselves against his allegations - he knew that so this is a very cheap shot. And he is still to work with these officials until May.

Anderson thinks he should be an MSP? Not if that is how he intends to behave - "it wisnae me, a wee official did it and run away".

38

A Regular,

26/08/2006 08:33:54

Since the Parly is full of glorified Councilers, Mr Anderson will feel right at home.
All he needs now is an area where you can have a monkey stand for election, and as long as it's a Labour one, he'll get in!!!

39

Socialism Not Prosperity,

26/08/2006 09:36:21

When will we ever learn?.......it's quite simple really....Don't vote Labour at the next election in May!

40

Old Town Resident,

Canongate 28/08/2006 13:23:34

Sorry I am late in adding to this discusion, but just in case you look again Simon, please visit eh8.org.uk and you will see that no one is saying that they wish to see the bus station retained.....but we do not agree with Anderson`s words that our community is a dark and dingy area of town....heres to a positive future for Edinburgh`s people and history....the peoples story as well as the high heid yins one!

41

Bub,

28/08/2006 16:01:26

Norfolk(42) re. don't vote Labour at the next election in May!

You don't honestly think that the Tories or any other party are any different, do you?

42

,

16/05/2009 15:16:55
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: D

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Should the council borrow £50m to get the Waterfront project up and running?
No, we can’t let them gamble with our money
Yes, it is likely to pay off in the long run
What fool would lend our city leaders £50m?


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.