Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Monday, 2nd November 2009 Change Date Latest Issue

MSP slams parly over party 'snub'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 July 2009
SCOTTISH Parliament bosses have been accused of snubbing key figures behind the Holyrood building by failing to include them in the tenth anniversary event.
The Queen addressed a special gathering in the parliament's debating chamber on Wednesday, exactly ten years after the official opening in its temporary home at the Assembly Hall on The Mound, but neither Brian Stewart, right, who led the Edinburgh h
alf of the design partnership with Barcelona-based Enric Miralles, nor any of the other professionals involved in the new building was invited to attend.

Now SNP MSP Linda Fabiani, who helped supervise the Holyrood project, is to urge the parliamentary authorities to make sure the snub is not repeated.

The row comes after MSPs themselves were accused of snubbing the Queen when 48 of them failed to attend Wednesday's event.

Apart from the Queen's visit, the main feature of Wednesday's celebrations was a giant birthday party for 142 children who were born on 1 July, the parliament's opening day, but the youngsters were not in the chamber for the Queen's address. The parliament said the 200-plus seats in the public gallery were taken up by MSPs' relatives and guests.

The snub to Mr Stewart and his colleagues was highlighted by Stuart Greig, director of a film about the £414 million building project, when he took part in a debate following a special screening earlier this week.

He said it was a "disgrace" they had not been invited. "Without Brian there would not be a building," he said.

Ms Fabiani, who was also taking part in the debate, agreed the lack of an invitation seemed "very petty" and she promised to write to Presiding Officer Alex Fergusson.

Today she said the celebrations were not for the tenth anniversary of the building – which only opened in 2004 – but nevertheless she would raise the issue.

She said: "Regardless of anything else, we do have a fabulous building, but representatives of those who built the building were not invited. Maybe it's something we could take on board in the future."

Independent Lothians MSP Margo MacDonald, a long-standing critic of the Holyrood building, also said Mr Stewart should have been invited. She said: "There should be some recognition of his role in the parliament building because when Enric Miralles died he took over as lead designer. It does seem a strange omission."

A parliament spokesman said there was no emphasis on VIP guests for Wednesday's ceremony, adding: "The focus of the day was on ten years of devolution and the children who shared their birthday with the parliament.

"The public gallery seating was for MSPs' relatives and guests."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 July 2009 10:21 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

fiferjohn,

03/07/2009 10:49:26
whats all the fuss i couldn't give a flying f**k about it. if the queen was snubed tough she and the idea of monarchy is outdated and in this day and age nobody should pay homage to anyone.
2

Gregor Addison,

Glasgow 03/07/2009 11:24:23
There should be no shame in being a republican. The monarchy are not everyone's cup of tea. I felt Christine Graham was honest in staying away and stating that it was because of her republican views. Well done to her for upholding her values instead of giving into what Monarchists think is 'polite', meaning to deny your beliefs.
3

fresian,

03/07/2009 12:08:37
2. Christine Graham might have been "honest" about being a republican, however, as a list MP she was not so honest regarding having constituents or a constituency.
4

alfonsa pedrosa,

embra 03/07/2009 12:12:39
What a shame,poor old Queenie nobody loves her,who cares.
5

ukrefusenik,

camelon 03/07/2009 12:36:25
#3 , ah bless , someone too challenged to understand
P R .
6

Sedov,

03/07/2009 12:41:12
I wouldn't travel 50 yards to hear the Queen

I wouldn't travel 5 yards to hear Helen Graham.
7

Gruntfuttock,

03/07/2009 13:32:04
I am a republican but as long as the SNP persist with their duplicitous policy of retaining the monarchy they will never get my vote. They are being dishonest with the Scottish electorate and trying to be all things to all men and women. What do they really stand for apart from 'Independence'? What exactly do they mean by 'Independence' if they wish to retain the monarchy? What is their true vision of an Independent Scotland? Does anyone know the answers to these questions? Perhaps the hidden agenda is that Salmond hopes to be crowned Alexander IV?
8

The Ayrshire Bard,

03/07/2009 13:32:34
They could have offered the empty seats to people from Coburg Street. The queen might have thought they were distant cousins.
9

Eve,

Scotland 03/07/2009 14:13:48
#7 Gruntfuttock: Sometimes you've just got to tackle wan union at a time. To go for a republic at the same time would spread them thin.

The union of the crown is about 100 years older that the union of the treaty 1707. So in some case it's a wee bit more tortable. Personally I think it should be abolished too as it paved the way for the union that I hate.

After independence has been sorted out, the people of Scotland would be in a better position to become a republic or what every we want it to be. I'm no fussy.
10

Burd,

Penicuik 03/07/2009 14:19:19
How is this a "snub", the party had absolutely nothing to do with the building being completed or when Members finally got to move in, it was a celebration of 10 years of the Scottish Parliament being re-convened. Which was celebrated with the kids that shared its "birthday". Stuart Greig seems to be making a bit of a mountain out of a molehill!
11

Mikey,

03/07/2009 14:52:53
The puir queen....

This wumman, born into luxury, has about as much in common with yer average Scot as??????
12

Son-of-scotland,

03/07/2009 15:41:29
The row comes after MSPs themselves were accused of snubbing the Queen when 48 of them failed to attend Wednesday's event.

^ there just no happy cause of this , no one cares about what she wants.

why should they get invited, ? what drinks on the public funds account?

they are a company that got paid to do a job, and at the mass expense , they got well compansated, and did a joke of a job, i mean it leaks people.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.