Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Tuesday, 24th November 2009 Change Date

Hearts boss Laszlo wins touchline ban appeal

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 December 2008
By BARRY ANDERSON
HEARTS manager Csaba Laszlo successfully argued against a two-match touchline ban during an appeal hearing at the Scottish Football Association this morning.
The SFA decided to uphold his appeal at a meeting of their disciplinary committee after he was issued the ban following Hearts' 1-1 draw with Aberdeen at Tynecastle on October 25.

Laszlo was reported for entering the field at full-time and attempting to confront referee Steve Conroy. He became embroiled in a heated exchange with fourth official John McKendrick and then remonstrated with Sandy Clark, the Aberdeen coach.

Laszlo argued that he simply followed his usual post-match ritual of going onto pitch to embrace his players, and the SFA have now agreed to quash his punishment.




Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 December 2008 1:23 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Heart of Midlothian FC
 
1

Propaganda boy,

02/12/2008 12:59:11
Any discipline for the 4th official now? Thought not.

Csaba went on to the pitch again on Sat as many managers do all over the country.

As for the west coast paper who at the time described it as "worse than Borucs antics and riot ensighting" they can get back under their stone and concentrate on their pro west coast bias.
2

GOA-JAMBO,

India 02/12/2008 12:59:55
SFA are no doubt feeling guilty of there racist attitude towards Miko, they have now taking a soft approach with Csaba to compensate.

C'mon the Gorgie !!
3

,

02/12/2008 13:05:37
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

scorchio,

West of the Pecos 02/12/2008 13:20:03
Like #1 It is amazing that the 4th official didn't get some kind of reprimand for his diabolical antics at the final whistle.
I can absolutely guarantee that that chhob would not have pushed Walter Smith in the chest with the electronic board. It just wouldn't happen, and it never will, as long as Wattie is manager of Glasgow Rangers.
5

,

02/12/2008 13:24:36
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

Glorious Hearts,

02/12/2008 13:25:43
And if you cannae spell it then here's what it says...

Nice one Csaba, I couldn't see how they could make this one stick
7

Glorious Hearts,

02/12/2008 14:00:56
Why was number 3 removed? For slagging Banderson or for pointing out that the EENs top dawg had managed to slip the word "Herats" into the headline before it was corrected?

Number 5 "typical lucky tramps"
The decision wasn't based on game of cards, it had nohing to do with luck.
Foolish stuff!
8

MAROON TOON,

02/12/2008 14:21:31
#5# Priceless!
9

Big T,

02/12/2008 14:53:52
Frankly no surprise! Why?

Simply because Walter Smith is about to face the SFA over his acusation that a Linesman was biased in favour of Celtic.

The Laslo decision means the SFA have not set a precident and can send Wattie on his way with a wee slap on the wrists!
10

Rambo The Jambo,

4-0 at Hampden 02/12/2008 15:14:25
# 7 Glorious Hearts

Careful, BB is watching....apparently!!!
11

Black Five,

edinburgh 02/12/2008 15:53:25
Bet he talked that much he bored the pants off the beaks.
12

Sarajevoiwasthere ,

London 02/12/2008 16:04:27
He was probably the one who smacked banders in the mouth in Germany, allegedly.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
RSS Feed of this article's comments
Delivery formats: RSS, Atom, Javascript & Email
 
  

 
 

More Sport

More Sport >>

More Heart of Midlothian FC

More Heart of Midlothian FC >>

Features

Scottish Business Briefing Stay informed

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.