Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Monday, 7th December 2009 Change Date

Future legislation: 'There was little for Edinburgh to cheer about'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 September 2008
IT should be of some concern to Edinburgh working people that despite widespread opposition, the SNP appears hell-bent on pressing ahead with plans to replace the council tax with a local income tax in its current legislative programme.
Should it ever become a reality, it is people in places like the Capital where the cost of living is already high who will suffer most.

Overall, there was little for Edinburgh to cheer about as the SNP unveiled its plans for new Bills over the n
ext year. There was no mention of the setting up a mechanism for the establishment and running of a Scottish Futures Trust, which is so vital to the city's schools replacement and refurbishment programme, and it is to be presumed the omission means the Government is confident that a method of getting the scheme up and running can happen without the need for legislation

Aside from council tax, the Government only proposes to tackle two other issues which can be described as heavyweight in the coming year – alcohol abuse and court sentencing.

Attempts to reform Scotland's booze culture are to be welcomed, but regardless of what measures the SNP proposes over sales and supply, they will have little or no effect on a problem which is now too deeply rooted to be fixed by blunt legislation alone.

But new laws to ensure more consistency in sentencing across a number of areas will be welcomed. And it is to be hoped that a Bill separating the council and Holyrood elections will ensure the count blunders which rocked Scotland – and particularly Edinburgh – last time around will not be repeated.

But it is almost certain that above all other things, the council tax reform debate will dominate the coming 12 months.

Labour and the Conservatives will continue to oppose the plans for a local income tax. But what should be of some concern is that the Liberal Democrats – who support the policy in principle, but not the method of delivery proposed by the government – may now be prepared to compromise and lend their support.. By giving themselves almost a year before presenting a Bill they have plenty of time to reach agreement. Were that to occur, it will only take the support of the Greens to make it happen.

This will mean that Scottish pay-packets will be the hardest hit in the UK and hundreds of people who are not currently liable for Council Tax will have the cash taken from them. And with the centralised system proposed by the Nationalists, it will mean that hard-working Edinburgh people will end up subsidising the rest of Scotland.

Council Tax has its problems, and maybe the alternative of a property tax has problems too, but another centralised income tax will be a disaster.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 September 2008 9:42 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Scottish National Party
 
1

Linda,

Edinburgh 04/09/2008 12:20:22

Local Income Tax will put MORE money into the pay packets of the vast majority of households in Edinburgh thus boosting the local economy.

Do the sums.
Edinburgh Council Tax Income Tax @ 3p

Band A £ 779 £10,000 £ 137
Band B £ 909 £15,000 £ 278
Band C £1039 £20,000 £ 437
Band D £1169 £25,000 £ 587
Band E £1428 £30,000 £ 737
Band F £1688
Band G £1948
Band H £2338

Even Sun Readers if not Scotsman Journalists know that any discrepancies with LIT can be ironed out with Independence or even full fiscal autonomy.
2

Findlay Thompson,

04/09/2008 12:42:59
Linda...Here, Here. The question is this, if this measure is beneficial to the vast majority of the Scots population then why oh why are the media the Tories & new Liebour so dead set against it?

Answers hear Posters; we are champing at the bit with anticipation!!
3

familymanwith2jobsandawifeworkingfulltime,

Edinburgh 04/09/2008 13:58:27
I am sick to back teeth of this proposed LIT. Why the SNP want tax hard work is beyond me. I find it disgusting that the people who contribute the least to the state want to contribute even less, at the same time expecting hard working idiots like me to make up the short fall. The whole idea of rewarding people finacially for their poor efforts in the work place is a disgrace and can do nothing to make us prosper. I saw madman Salmond mouthing his poison on news at ten last night. He will have the whole nation thinking we are a bunch of raving lunatics up here. The man is doing tremendous damage to the Scottish nation and needs to be stopped.
4

Crania Nelsen,

Edinburgh 04/09/2008 14:12:08
#1 Linda

This is all very well for single or one-income households but what if there are two (or more?) incomes per home? Let's face it, these day's it's pretty difficult to buy even a small flat in Edinburgh on one income, especially one as 'low' as the average wage of £25,000. If both partners earned £25,000 they would pay exactly the same LIT as Council Tax on a typical two-bed flat on Band D.

(£1169 : 0.03 = £38966, add 2 x tax allowance of £5,435 = £50,000)
5

NorT,

Edinburgh 04/09/2008 14:42:15
#1 I agree. #4 It is about time that all people who used the local services paid for them. If there is more than 1 personn in a house then everybody should pay for the services they use. That is why LIT is fairer than the council tax.
6

Crania Nelsen,

Edinburgh 04/09/2008 14:54:58
#5 I agree that people should - when they can - pay for services they use, and I am not necessarily opposed to LIT. I just don't agree with #1's calculations that 'prove' that LIT will put more money in people's pockets, because her simplistic example only holds for one person/earner per household. Simple as that!
7

Crania Nelsen,

Edinburgh 04/09/2008 14:56:53
#5 and - what is the logic behind "wanting people to pay for services they use" when you say/agree that LIT will put "more money in people's pockets"? Surely the money for these services has to come from somewhere?!
8

Porty Nat,

Edinburgh 04/09/2008 15:24:03
#3 - if there was a tax on brains and mental equilibrium, you'd be quids in.
9

Pilrig.,

Livingston 04/09/2008 18:49:59
More NuLab Embra whingin by the leader-writer, and poster 3 is havering.
10

Frenchfrog,

Edinburgh 05/09/2008 10:27:58
I'm French, earn a decent salary, my Scottish girlfriend as well and if this law goes through we will simply fly away from here, as many other foreigners will do! Let's Scotland be independent and let Scottish people live on their oil money for a few years before it dries out and then realise that they did a pretty big mistake by being too nationalistic. SNP will create a state for social housing and derelect housing estates, long live Scotland and the SNP party!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.