Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Tuesday, 8th December 2009 Change Date

Treasury takes 65 per cent Lloyds stake

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 March 2009
ANOTHER multi-billion pound injection of public cash into Lloyds Banking Group was announced today.
The Government is to insure £260 billion of the bank's potentially "toxic" assets, according to the Treasury.

In return the taxpayer will up its ownership of the bank from 43% to 65% – or 77% including non-voting shares.

Lloyds Banking Group has also pledged to lend an additional £28 billion over the next two years as part of the deal.

The Government's fee for limiting Lloyds' losses from £260bn of potentially bad assets totals £15.6 billion.

Alongside taking extra shares and obtaining the commitment to lend to businesses and individuals, the Treasury will also upgrade £4 billion of the non-voting shares it already holds.

Lloyds Banking Group was the FTSE 100 Index's leading riser yesterday amid hopes that a deal was close to limit its potential losses.

The company was forced to ask for further support because of the heavy losses run up by HBOS – which it took over to prevent its collapse.
The news means that the taxpayer has a controlling interest in another bank.

The Government has already struck a similar agreement with Royal Bank of Scotland.

RBS – which last week posted a UK record loss of £24.1 billion – has agreed a similar deal to place £325 billion of riskier assets such as commercial property loans and mortgage-backed securities into the government scheme.

Under the insurance scheme, Lloyds will take the first "hit" of up to £25 billion on toxic assets before the taxpayer steps in.

The new ordinary shares in the bank will be offered to existing private shareholders first, with the Government committing to buy whatever is left.

The Treasury said the lending commitment was for an additional £3 billion in mortgages and £11 billion to businesses over the next 12 months, and a similar amount over the subsequent year – depending on "economic circumstances at that time".

The agreement was struck in principle after days of detailed wrangling between the Treasury and Lloyds bosses, who were said to be unhappy with the company being in majority state control.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 March 2009 1:14 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Scotland's banking crisis
 
1

Amenemhat,

07/03/2009 12:33:48
two banks for the price of one excellent
2

me150,

07/03/2009 14:00:25
Good move!!

Well done Gordon, we can count on you!!
3

FTH22inarow,

07/03/2009 15:14:48
Private enterprise, ain't it great
4

FTH22inarow,

07/03/2009 15:18:51
4 All this to protect London, rob the poor to keep the super rich, super rich, just think if the Governments policy over the last 30 years had ensured we still had a manufacturing industry, we might still have an economy. Thatcherism is dead, pity she ain't.
5

alfonsa pedrosa,

embra 07/03/2009 15:53:23
This sounds great but,i was much better of in the 60s sadly these days wont be back.
6

Pond Hall,

07/03/2009 17:46:29
good one, take over HBOS, then mention the HBOS lost £10bn.

PS can you bail us out

Criminals : both the Bankers and Politicians who have overseen this.

rob a bank or a papershop of a few quid, and you get locked away.

Yet you blow umpteen billions and get off Scot free, well not quite, you get a £700,000 pension for the privlige.
7

Tartan Viking,

07/03/2009 18:11:52
#4. FTH22inarow,

Absolutely spot on sir (or lady).

#6. You too.
8

COLINTON.MAINS,

Oakville Ontario 07/03/2009 22:17:54
LIOYDS.TSB.let.them.go.bust.said.all.along.i.would.not.give.them.a.nickel
9

Ian down under,

Musselburgh 08/03/2009 20:44:19
In view of the breathtakingly huge amounts of money involved I would have expected a few more postings here. Where are the antitrammers who get agitated at every additional pound spent on trams? Can I assume that they have no problem with greedy banks getting billions and billions which the public will never get a return on?
10

Julian.,

edinburgh 08/03/2009 23:19:11
Ian,

Exactly. Spend millions on an asset which will be with us for the next 100 years and will employ lots of people building it and everyone gets up in arms.

Spend a few billion bailing banks out which will probably not get much in return and nobody's bothered.
11

Niadh,

Edinburgh 09/03/2009 11:31:58
#11 and #12.
The difference is that there is more likelihood of the banks becoming profitable again than there ever is of the tramLINE (or half of one) making a profit in the next 100 years
12

Julian.,

edinburgh 09/03/2009 22:04:29
#13,

Yes, but for the benefit of you and all the other pure capitalists, the tram line is not there to make a profit. It's objectives are to reduce congestion, reduce pollution, increase the efficiency of travel, improve the quality of life for those using public transport and things like that which can't be measured in pure monetary terms.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.