Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Wednesday, 4th November 2009 Change Date Latest Issue

Pedestrian Princes Street: 'Diversion gives an idea of what may be possible'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 April 2009
PRINCES Street is "one of the world's greatest public boulevards", in the words of the acclaimed architect Sir Terry Farrell.
It is easy to take for granted anything that you see on an almost daily basis, so sometimes it's useful to stop for a moment to appreciate our city as others see it. The setting of our most famous street is undoubtedly majestic.

That is why it's s
o good to see the debate about pedestrianising the street opened up again by deputy council leader Steve Cardownie.

The ongoing tram works, despite the obvious pain they are causing in the short term, have given us pause for thought. They have offered a tantalising taste of what Princes Street might be like without traffic on it.

Walking down the street on days when the trams work is not in full swing, it does not take a great leap of imagination to see how things might be if traffic were banned.

Just imagine sitting there outside a cafe soaking up the sunshine and the beautiful views, with only the occasional murmur of a passing tram and the noise of other visitors to disturb your peace.

This isn't just idle day-dreaming though.

The experience of the current traffic diversions shows that it is possible to achieve.

The pedestrianisation of Castle Street and the reopening of St Andrew Square have also shown already what a difference creating a high quality environment can make to parts of the city centre.

Those areas have bucked the national trend by seeing a number of new store openings despite the credit crunch and industry experts say that uplift is directly linked to the recent improvements.

This vision is not without its drawbacks.

Pedestrianisation of Princes Street would surely spell the end of any such ambitions for George Street.

But don't forget once trams are up and running there would be fewer buses running through the city centre so the volume of displaced traffic would be less than at the moment.

Such a bold move on Princes Street should ideally be coupled with more improvements to public transport and better car parking around the city centre.

A network of trams, rather than a single line, which would allow people to get quickly into the city centre from all corners of the city, and those long-promised underground car parks, would be a good start.

But now we are really dreaming.

FRINGE FACTS – A WORD FROM THE SPONSORS
The main sponsor of the Fringe itself, Royal Bank of Scotland, will return for 2009.

The Assembly Rooms has lost the backing of Belhaven, thought to be worth £60,000. The banner on its website carries the prominent plea: "Your company can become part of the Edinburgh Fringe – Sponsor Assembly 09."

The if.comedy awards have lost the backing of Intelligent Finance, but organisers plan to unveil a new-look awards next month.

The So You Think You're Funny newcomers award, run by the Gilded Balloon, has the backing of Sony Pictures again for 2009.





Page 1 of 1

 
1

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 15/04/2009 12:49:19
"one of the world's greatest public boulevards"

Yes. Maybe 20-30 years ago before they ruined it with one-way systems, buses only, un-neccessary traffic lights, bus lanes and filter lanes.

'Diversion gives an idea of what may be possible'

Yes. Complete and utter bl00dy chaos.

Scrap the trams. Open ALL the roads and let's get back to normality.
2

PeeBee,

Chippenham 15/04/2009 13:07:43
Princes Street looked its best in the days of the original trams. Hopefully the new line when completed will be a catalyst for more until a network as extensive as the first is recreated.

http://www.edinphoto.org.uk/0_edin_t/0_edinburgh_transport_-_trams_in_central_edinburgh.htm
3

GraemeH,

Edinburgh 15/04/2009 13:13:47
Does the EEN know just how few buses are expected to be replaced by the vanity tram? A mere 22. The expected traffic displacement is tiny.
4

Tynietiger,

15/04/2009 13:31:24
Utter chaos in Edinburgh for one expensive tram line to replace one bus route. The Scottish government and City Council could have spent the money on many more needed projects rather than Labour and Lib Dem's tram folly.
5

Grumpy,

15/04/2009 16:11:00
"But don't forget once trams are up and running there would be fewer buses running through the city centre" - Not that many fewer. The trams are only replacing the No 22 and some bits of the No 10 and 16. Otherwise, 80% of Edinburgh population who won't be served by the trams will still expect to have buses going into the city centre.

To think that for a mere fraction of the cost, the suburban rail link could have been redeveloped using trams and could have served about 70% of the population of Edinburgh and a good deal of Mid/East/West Lothian commuters too.
6

Realist,

Edinburgh 15/04/2009 16:55:50
According to the Great Book of Tram (otherwise known as the business case) that foretells of untold profits and passengers and which was sold to some gullible people in city hall there will only be 2 less buses per hour in each direction as a result of the tram - well at least until Mr Souter gets his hands on the network and every service in the city whether its on the tram 'line' or not gets cut in frequency

By the time the tram is built there will be no shops on Princes Street, most of us are already shopping at the Gyle, Kinnaird Park etc and i for one have no intention or returning - I like free parking.
7

Richard Lionheart,

16/04/2009 17:22:32
“Just imagine sitting there outside a cafe soaking up the sunshine and the beautiful views, with only the occasional murmur of a passing tram and the noise of other visitors to disturb your peace.”

So let us get this right. Princes Street is no longer to be viewed as a busy bustling shopping street heaving with shoppers from daybreak to sunset, and the trams are only to pass occasionally!
8

Cooncil Hooses,

The Slums 22/11/2009 03:13:46
#5 (Grumpy)

"The trams are only replacing the No 22 and some bits of the No 10 and 16"

Er, I think you forgot Services number, 1, 11, and 49 also go along Princes Street. Also not forgetting First Bus services that go to smaller towns outwith Ediburgh who servce the community outside unlike the trams. Moving the trams to Princes Street only means the buses and their stops are moved elsewhere.

Whos idea was it to put the tram lines smack bang in the centre of the street? Idiots!


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.