Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Wednesday, 9th December 2009 Change Date

Banner plan to keep eyesore under wraps

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 January 2009
ONE of the Capital's biggest eyesores is set to be wrapped in a giant illuminated banner ahead of its proposed £850 million redevelopment.
Developers behind plans to demolish the St James Centre want to cover part of the existing structure with a massive "jigsaw" measuring roughly 60ft by 240ft.

The banner, which will cover the upper levels of New St Andrew House, will build up a pic
ture of the inside of the proposed development by gradually revealing artists' impressions like a puzzle.

There will also be a smaller illuminated advertising panel set within the larger banner.

Planning permission is currently being sought to bulldoze the St James Centre complex, which includes New St Andrew House, and replace it with two hotels, shops and luxury flats.

The project, the biggest city centre development in recent memory, could create up to 4000 retail jobs and 7000 jobs during the lengthy construction phase.

Henderson Global Investors, the owners of the shopping centre, say the development could also provide a £20m shot in the arm for the city's tourism trade.

The banner, which will be visible from Leith Walk, has been recommended for approval by council officials and could remain in place for up to three years.

Planners say the banner would be useful for "concealing" the empty office accommodation which forms part of one of the Capital's most maligned edifices.

In a report to councillors, John Bury, the council's head of planning, said: "Although the banner would be large, it would be set in the context of a host building that is very considerable in scale and massing.

"The proposal would provide an opportunity to conceal this part of the complex, the appearance of which is exacerbated by virtue of the office accommodation being empty.

"It would introduce a potentially interesting and stimulating feature which would be limited to a single elevation, thereby ensuring an appropriate degree of visual containment when read against the backdrop of the remainder of the complex."

Last year, retailer John Lewis was ordered to remove an advert in the window of the company's store in the St James Centre.

Council officials said the poster was dragging down the appearance of the area, despite the office buildings behind the shop once being described as a form of "architectural vandalism".

The new banner is expected to be given the go-ahead when the application goes before the council's development management subcommittee on Wednesday.





Page 1 of 1

 
1

World class concrete,

08/01/2009 11:52:55
Right now New St Andrews House, because it's grey and unlit, isn't really noticeable from Leith Walk, and that's a good thing. Now they want to make it VERY noticeable by putting a massive banner on it, which is a bad idea. And since there's only an outline planning proposal so far, with no detailed designs for any of the new buildings as yet prepared or submitted, I can't see what purpose is served by showing artists' impressions on the poster. I have to conclude that Edinburgh Council are expected to approve this because they will profit financially.
2

elayne,

08/01/2009 12:56:58
i remember the st james centre etc being built,ok its not the most attractive of buildings but personally i find brutalist and modernist architecture to be quite interesting and feel it is just as valid as some of the older established types of architecture and will kind of miss it
3

World class concrete,

08/01/2009 12:59:05
The opinion poll questions could have been worded better. "Anything" wouldn't be an improvement. And no one will be "tearing down" the St James Centre, the'll be demolishing it with some care for the neighbouring buildings I hope.
4

PaulB,

Edinburgh 08/01/2009 13:31:01
Putting a banner on this monstrosity of a building will just serve to draw even more attention to it. Fod goodness sake just start demolishing it as soon as possible. And is there planning permission for the scaffolding adverising banners being prominently displayed on old town buildings, very highly visible from Princes Street? They are an eyesore too and totally inappropriate for a World heritage site.
5

LUVMACITY,

IN THE LOBBY 08/01/2009 13:31:54
ELAYNE, I TAKE IT YOU ARE JESTING. THE WHOLE STRUCTURE IS ATROCIOUS. IF YOU HAD SEEN ST JAMES SQUARE PRIOR TO REDEVELOPEMENT THEN YOU WOULD HAVE APPRECIATED REAL BEAUTY.
6

The Leith Cowboy BAM BAM,

Bruxelles 08/01/2009 15:08:18
tear down that tenement on the hill at the top of the high street as well, replace it with a big buckaroo.
7

COLINTON.MAINS,

Oakville Ontario 08/01/2009 23:28:03
ALL.THE.NEW.BUILDINGS.IN.EDINBURGH.ARE.TRASH
8

MoiraMac,

09/05/2009 18:24:26
I like the idea of eyesores being hidden under wraps! I hope all the eyesores on the royal mile will be next.
Any shop that looks like this should be wrapped:
http://members.virtualtourist.com/m/p/m/aff67/

I don't know where this shop is but there a few just like this on the Canongate! The tourists love photographing these shops! 'The Best Fae Scotland' Ha! Ha!


9

MoiraMac,

09/05/2009 18:55:05
http://image10.webshots.com/11/9/52/64/180595264vrAExE_ph.jpg

http://lh4.ggpht.com/_S4m1-1Tu7hM/SHdH6_7VTWI/AAAAAAAAAqk/fJHMqFZvuDg/IMG_0543.JPG

http://img1.photographersdirect.com/img/5277/wm/pd74260.jpg

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/116/300358625_09861f6831.jpg?v=0

http://cache.virtualtourist.com/1/1979015-Souvenirs-Edinburgh.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3560/3303526623_de332f2e48.jpg
Some of these have given me a good laugh! The guy in the kilt in the 1st one is a hoot! Still I would rather see them WRAPPED!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.