Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Tuesday, 24th November 2009 Change Date

Letters

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 March 2008
Work is more than a little inconvenient

I AM writing about my disgust with Edinburgh City Council's decision to introduce trams to Edinburgh. I attended most of the meetings held by TIE for the council about the new trams. I also attended the meetings at the Scottish Parliament and was a
witness against the Edinburgh trams.

At these meetings it was frequently stated there would be as little inconvenience as possible while the work was being carried out for the trams.

If the council consider the utter chaos which is going on in the city at present on behalf of the trams is a little inconvenience, then I am afraid I do not agree with them, and I suspect I am not alone.

When travelling by bus at the moment one has to allow much more time to reach one's destination.

When travelling on foot one has to take inconvenient detours around the barriers, which have been erected around the workings for the trams.

The congestion being caused in Princes Street and Leith Street is an example of the congestion there will be when the system is up and running. In Princes Street I would suggest there is insufficient space for two trams down the centre of the road and two bus lanes on either side of the trams.

Unless, of course, the plan is to remove the broad pavements, which were installed recently at great cost, bearing in mind this would entail removing the bus shelters with new information posts, and the ticket meters (which are still being installed).

At the moment when the buses overtake each other they are going over the area, which will contain the trams. It will only take something to break down in one of the lanes to cause gridlock.

And the whole system is a complete waste of money and totally unnecessary. These trams will be running on the same routes which have perfectly good bus services.

I have written to TIE about this, but I expect as usual the council will do what they want and totally ignore the will of the taxpayers.

Miss H T Reynolds, Balbirnie Place, Edinburgh

Art deal is a great British triumph

CONGRATULATIONS to the National Galleries of Scotland for securing for the nation Anthony d'Offay's impressive private collections of contemporary art for the nation.

As Linda Fabiani was quick to point out, the doors to modern art have been well and truly opened for everyone in Scotland.

With £10 million from the UK Government, £7m from the UK National Heritage Memorial Fund and £10m from the Scottish Government funding the deal it is a good example what can be achieved with a strong Scotland working as part of the United Kingdom.

Gordon MacRae, Upper Grove Place, Edinburgh

Bags are blight on beautiful coastline

WELL done to Marks & Spencer for introducing a charge for plastic carrier bags. Evidence of their disastrous effect on our local seabirds and other wildlife has been clearly demonstrated.

Reducing the use of carrier bags is just a small step but, hopefully, it will lead to growing awareness of how some of the most beautiful parts of the East Lothian coastline are blighted by all kinds of plastic rubbish.

Jenny Mollison, The Laigh House, Inveresk Village, Musselburgh

Poster witch-hunt killing music scene

AS a musician, songwriter and director of a music publishing company, I must concur with details of the issues raised in your article "Fly boys sick of getting the brush off in poster crackdown" (News, February 26) and begin with a simple fact.

The live music scene in Edinburgh, as in other cities around the world, is reliant on street postering as one of its important advertising vehicles to fill venues.

As a result of this current witch-hunt against flyposters in Edinburgh, the live music scene in the Capital is slowly disintegrating and disappearing, to be replaced with theme bars and Omni Centres.

The previously vibrant multi-textured fabric of the inner city is turning into a predictably themed centre for stag and hen nights and middle-taste tourist tat.

The attacks on Edinburgh gig managers and club owners for using postering to advertise their upcoming events is having a negative effect on that local economy.

Glasgow, on the other hand, is alive and thriving and absolutely thrumming with live bands and a vibrant music scene spawning popular bands and world music scene contenders. Glasgow supports and values its own inner city arts culture, as does Dundee. Both cities have "legal" poster sites, as do most if not all of the major cities in the UK (and Europe and the Americas).

Here's a fact for you: It is a Scottish Government directive to find a positive solution for "designated legal postering sites", and Edinburgh City Council is dragging its feet.

Edinburgh seems to want clean streets, (lots of new expensive residential developments), no noise, no vibrancy – except once a year during the Festival, when a bit of excitement is allowed. The rest of the year, Edinburgh, the purported capital city of Scotland, conducts herself like one of her Morningside ladies, with the lace curtains drawn.

Electra Smith, MGCK Music, Edinburgh

Perjury strikes at the heart of justice

MARY BLAIR (letters, February 28) argues £1m is being "squandered" on the Sheridan perjury inquiry.

Perjury strikes at the very heart of the justice system and is one of the most serious of offences. If there is evidence of perjury then it is appropriate that no stone is left unturned to establish the truth.

A court will decide on whether people are guilty of perjury. The time to examine whether or not the police are directing their resources appropriately is after the result of the trial.

Cameron Rose, Conservative Councillor, Southside/Newington





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 March 2008 11:00 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

I C Weiner,

01/03/2008 15:20:12
Miss H T Reynolds...if it were up to people like you, Edinburgh would be a boring, quiet little backwater of a city.

Every major city must experience inconvenience now and again to progress and modernise. Edinburgh is no different.

The issues are the same the world over with the introduction of trams. First people moan about the cost, then they moan about the disruption, then they moan about the cost some more, and then when the trams are finally operating, millions of people use them.

Trams are coming to Edinburgh whether you like it or not and no amount of whining, moaning and stomping of feet if going to change it. Get over it.
2

James (1),

01/03/2008 17:15:04
#2 Whilst I normally see eye to eye with your views I have to say on this one we are totally opposites.

Mr Sheridan is NOT some form of freedom fighter doing his bit for the common man and now being picked on by the establishment. He is alleged to have used his family to lie and they have been charged with this.

I cannot conceieve why you would think it is ok for them to get away with this?
Who cares who they lied against.
If I steal from M&S or ASDA does that make it alright that I am only stealing from big companies.

His family were an integral part of his case which he won and "if" they lied then they need to be brought to account for it.

The "information" which is coming to the media is from Sheridan and supporters so is likely to be biased.

The police cannot refute or enter into a slagging match held through the media. The court is where they will put forward there evidence.
Cost is not the issue here.

3

Seabhag,

01/03/2008 19:28:09
Jim - the text from Pastor Niemoller is below. I hope you are not equating the horrors of Nazi Germany with the question of whether Tommy Sheridan had his pants down or not?

First they came for the Jews
and I did not speak out - because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for the communists
and I did not speak out - because I was not a communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists
and I did not speak out - because I was not a trade unionist.

Then they came for me -
and by then there was no one left to speak out for me.

4

Skull,

Edinburgh 01/03/2008 21:18:20
I think you are missing the point Seabhag.

The point being: it maybe only a matter of time before they come looking for ….





5

James (1),

01/03/2008 21:28:25
#4 you ask "remember a jury has already believed sheridan. why?"

Perhaps and I say perhaps it was because Mr Sheridans family lied! Remember there was a huge incentive and now the wagons have to be circled!

I think you are being quite insulting to the police. They were instructed to investigate perjury relating to this case.
They are doing their job. They need to get it right and that is why I say money should not even be mentioned as some sort of reason to stop.
I dare say the pressure is on the police as this is a high profile case but at the end of the day they are only reporting the facts. They do not decide.

Special treatment gets given to allow sorts of things in life, just ask any councillor who has claimed too much in expenses, or someone getting a job say as drugs czar which was not advertised but it happens and to deny it would make you a fool.

I personally don't like Mr Sheridan. Not for his political views but to me he is a wolf in sheeps clothing. All the time making out he is for the common man when in truth he is for himself and if the common man benefits by what he does then that is their good fortune. A fortunate accident!
6

NorT,

Edinburgh 01/03/2008 22:13:52
Well said Miss Reynolds. The centre of the town is like a bomb site. No wonder people are shopping elsewhere. Also the have barriers along the centre of princes Street obstructing the free passage of pedestrians and they have taken away the islands. These barriers are illegal.
7

James (1),

03/03/2008 07:41:40
I agree that, for example, you or I asking for perjury to be investigated would not happen. When a sheriff asks then that's a totally different thing and if you cannot see the difference then there is very little point with me going further. What a sheriff asks for a sheriff gets.
This was not done because the police just decided to go for " good old tommy, the champion of the people".

If we take the view that he and his associates lied then they need to be made to pay for it.

If we take the view that he and his associates did not lie then there will be no evidence.
Police report facts. They are NOT out to pick on Mr Sheridan. He appears to have given them all the ammo they need and through his "The world revolves around Tommy" attitude, he has dragged his family into the mire. To repeat myself, hell mend him!
The police charged them so it is not unreasonable to think there is evidence. It is unreasonable to think they are doing this for reasons other than to ensure they do what the sheriff wants, which is a FULL investigation into the matter.
You appear to me to be quite willing to run down the police (for reasons best know to yourself) yet stick up for someone who on the face of it is guilty. I say on the face of it purely on his family being charged.



8

James (1),

03/03/2008 07:51:36
Re Electra Smith letter- Just you and yours go ahead and plaster Edinburgh with posters! The city will spend the revenue that you pay for this advertising on worthwhile causes! What, you don't pay for this? It's free and you put up posters where ever you want, without permission? But at least all of Edinburgh wants their city covered? What, you have not asked?

Here is a newsflash! The vast majority do not care about your bands and gigs. If they are so good then get the organiser to pay for advertising like any crediable business does and stop causing an eyesore to Edinburgh and costing tax payers (those are people who have real jobs) money to clean up your mess!
9

Koffindodger,

Edinburgh 03/03/2008 10:37:59
11 Jim Taylor

Whilst you may see this as some fascistic political witch hunt most people just see it as some charmer who is used to talking his way out of "situations" being pinned down for doing something wrong and not enjoying it at all.

Perjury where one party benefits to the tune of a quarter of a million pounds (or bucks/big ones/ spandooleys as you call them) is in my view a serious matter which the police would be completely in dereliction of their duties to let slide.
10

Vic,

Edinburgh 03/03/2008 12:25:41
Miss Reynolds appears to have some problems with the english language. She says that "..it was frequently stated there would be as little inconvenience as possible while the work was being carried out for the trams." Fair enough. She then takes a huge leap: "If the council consider the utter chaos ... a little inconvenience..."

That's not what they said. They said that the inconvenience would be as little as is possible, not that there would be little inconvenience! I hate it when people distort arguments to try to make a point.

Of course, whether you judge that the current inconvenience is as little as possible is another matter!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.