Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Wednesday, 4th November 2009 Change Date Latest Issue

Margo MacDonald: Strikes are just a sign of the changing times

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 February 2009
MICHAEL CONNARTY, the MP for Linlithgow, speaking on Radio Scotland, didn't miss the striking power workers, who walked off the job in solidarity with their brother trade unionists in Lindsey, and hit the wall. He voiced angry disappointment at what he described as their "chauvinism" in protesting against Portuguese and Italian workers brought to north Lincolnshire by an Italian company contracted to Total, the international oil company.
I admired his guts for saying what he really thought. Many of his colleagues, including the Minister for Employment, Pat McFadden, were hiding behind weasel words and promises to investigate whether any employment laws had been broken, but my admira
tion for Michael Connarty's honesty stopped short of agreement with his conclusion.

The strikers' slogan – British jobs for British workers – was coined not by the BNP but by Prime Minister Gordon Brown when he was focused on proving he is British not Scottish, and that true Brits come in many skin colours and from all corners of the globe.

True to form, he didn't really spell out his philosophy, he left himself wriggle room. He didn't say bluntly that skin colour or Islam are irrelevant to modern national identity as felt by millions of people in Britain, and he didn't acknowledge that many of these "new Brits" whose forebears came from the West Indies or the subcontinent feel English, Scottish, Welsh or Irish, rather than British.

So some people were a little puzzled, others were disappointed, when he appeared to play a narrow, British nationalist card to keep white, working-class voters on side by choosing the British jobs for British workers battle cry, but others were delighted. They believe too many people have come to the UK and settled here, so the PM's words were music to their ears, and some of the anti-immigration brigade in the BNP have been in evidence on the picket lines.

It would appear from the comments of their trade union officials and their unofficial shop-floor leaders that the BNP and Michael Connarty haven't read their lips. The strikers don't object to the Italian and Portuguese workers because of their nationality, but they do object to a company hiring them for lower wages and poorer conditions than British workers would be paid.

There's another reason why Lincolnshire workers feel so threatened by workers from the Continent at this time. For years there's been an acceptance of the EU's treaty obligation on every member state to sign up to the common market and the free movement of capital and labour, goods and services, but right now people are scared stiff that the bottom will fall out of their family's future. They're scared about their communities being torn apart because of unemployment.

Good guys like Michael Connarty, fly guys like Pat McFadden and unwise guys like Gordon Brown will do well to listen to the strikers rather than brand them racist. They should also speak urgently to the EU Commission and national political leaders in Europe about building in a mechanism for avoiding the resentment being expressed by strikers trying to ring-fence jobs in their home areas when times are rough, like now.

The right for workers to go from one EU country to another for work could be withdrawn for a given period of time dependent on a country's needs and priorities as determined by its government.

For Lord Mandelson, that is out of the question. In his book, that fundamentally challenges the idea of the free movement of people in the EU.

But what is more likely to drive a wedge between communities than forcing them to conform to rules set by those above them that don't meet their basic needs as distinctive national communities?

Fertility stance is folly
JONATHON PORRITT, chairman of the Sustainable Development Commission, says two children are enough for everyone. He says two siblings, over their life-time, will burn carbon equivalent to five acres of woodland, and he says NHS resources should be switched from curing illness to contraception and abortion services, if persuasion doesn't do the trick.

So should advice about infertility treatments be discontinued? And how much carbon is burned by the equipment needed to keep very early, tiny babies alive?

As the Chinese found out from their one-child policy when it was too late, trying to buck nature to this extent creates problems that can't be imagined until they burst upon the demographics of a country, throwing planning, employment and social habits into confusion.

Certainly, use contraception of the variety that accords with your beliefs, but you decide.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 February 2009 9:35 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Margo MacDonald
 
1

Mercutio,

FALKIRK 04/02/2009 10:26:58
A fairly balanced article from Margo, but her admiration for Michael Connarty's "guts" is misplaced. Connarty is another of these so called left wing MPs quite comfortable on the gravy train. If he had any guts he would, like Dennis Canavan have challenged the Labour Party and stood as an independendent Candidate for the Scottish Parliament after he "failed" the MSP selection process.
Accusing these protestors of chauvinism beggars belief.
2

Doh,

04/02/2009 12:33:06

I agree with above that this is oen of Margo's better articles.

I think her admiration for Connarty is fair enough - it does take courage to say things that your own constituents dont want to hear.

The workers are just trying to protect their own self interest. Most people do that. Rich bankers do that. Margo does it everyone time she calls for more concessions for Edinburgh - pork barrel stuff.

Poly Toynbee made some interesting comments about globalisation on the radio this morning - saying that although it maybe benefited the top "10%" it was perhaps bad for the bottom "50%".

Seems to me you can argue about the percentages - but there is still truth in what she says.

I dont see "professional" jobs being globalised - they are too protected by laws and institutions to allow that. The BMA and the lawyers are the most powerful trade unions in the land - but they have tacit government approval for their chauvenism.


stand up to your own constituents - wether you agree with him or not.


3

Eric D,

04/02/2009 13:36:27
The strikes are a sign of the globalisation juggernaut instigated by the EU. The unions are looking after themselves, and don't give a monkey's about the British worker. Like you, they are rampant Globalisers, I wonder what Margo's opinion is on the prospect of 70 m impovershed Turks joining the EU and the repercussions for our labour market.

#2 - Polly Toynbee was (unusually) entirely correct, 99% of all Poles work at minimum wage, which undecuts and displaces the indigenous worker at the lower end of the employment spectrum. The lower working class also suffer in the housing market ie council allocation. It should be no surprise it's the lower working class that's deserted nulab for the BNP.

4

Truthman,

DC 04/02/2009 14:38:58
"Strikes are just a sign of the changing times"?!? I thought strikes were the keystone of Labour culture.
5

watcher,

Edinburgh 04/02/2009 15:00:56
Strikes were the keystone of Socialist culture to bring about change, and it`s just as well they did.
6

Truthman,

DC 04/02/2009 16:43:36
So, things are pretty nice there for everyone now? The EEN paints a different picture. My wife fled in the early 1970s and is dead against returning but I will tell her that matters have improved after socialism's destruction of industry. What are the dole rates these days?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.