Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Monday, 2nd November 2009 Change Date Latest Issue

Government denies plans to nationalise Lloyds TSB

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 16 February 2009
DOWNING Street insisted today that there were no plans for the outright nationalisation of Lloyds Banking Group as shares in the company continued to struggle.
Amid growing concern about the group's position, Gordon Brown's spokesman also dismissed any suggestion that the Prime Minister regretted the Lloyds-HBOS merger.

Alarm spread after a shock warning of £10 billion in annual losses at HBOS before the
weekend.

The two banks are 43 per cent owned by the state after receiving £17 billion in bailout cash, but the market value of the group is now less than £10 billion.

Lord Turner of Ecchinswell, chairman of the Financial Services Authority, suggested yesterday that HBOS could have been saved without the need for a takeover.

Tory leader David Cameron said the merger was now looking like a "bad decision".

The Prime Minister's spokesman said today that Mr Brown had no regrets "at all" – but stressed that the proposal came from the banks themselves and was supported by opposition parties.

"The idea of the merger originally came from the companies involved who approached the Government to ask us to change competition legislation in order to let it happen," he said.

"We are glad that we did that, and we did that with cross-party support at the time.

"The Prime Minister remains of the view that the merger is in the wider interest of the stability of the UK financial system and I think you have to ask yourself what would the alternative have been had Lloyds not taken over HBOS at the time.

"It would have been almost certainly that HBOS would have found it very difficult to continue. That would have meant the Government and the taxpayer intervening to support the totality of HBOS."

Asked whether the full-blown nationalisation of Lloyds was in prospect, he added: "While of course nothing is ruled out, there is no active consideration being given to the nationalisation of Lloyds."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 February 2009 12:59 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Lloyds TSB
 
1

Bill MacD,

16/02/2009 13:44:23
Why do we tolerate the politicians to give away our money without a fair return. If a bank is not financially viable and has to be 'rescued' with our money, we have the right then to own it, just like in any other area of business. Why one rule for the 'b'ankers?
2

Hmm ...,

16/02/2009 14:29:31
... the Prime Minister's spokesman said "The Prime Minister remains of the view that the merger is in the wider interest of the stability of the UK financial system and I think you have to ask yourself what would the alternative have been had Lloyds not taken over HBOS at the time.

"It would have been almost certainly that HBOS would have found it very difficult to continue. That would have meant the Government and the taxpayer intervening to support the totality of HBOS."

Translated as "better a sound bank is wrecked than that I have to find even more money that I don't have to save HBOS".

Tough, Gordon - instead of leaving Lloyds as a sound bank, like HSBC, you have threatened its stability.

Great financial management! If you are a Marxist!

Marxists think everything should be publicly owned - Gordon is clearly working toward that.
3

just-whatever-eh,

DR/F1/MO2 16/02/2009 17:27:05
The intolerance towards the rescue of banking system from various people and above is amazing. These people clearly dont have a bank account or any other type of financial product & would gladly see them all go to the wall taking their savings with them too.

With the above case, people need to understand here that the shareholders of both banks voted in favour of this deal. The deal was setup by the government yes, but it was the touting by the executives of both boards that this was the right deal would typically be why shareholders voted in favour.

Now of course the board of HBOS which said the deal was right for shareholders have gone.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.