Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Wednesday, 9th December 2009 Change Date

Don't let tram works drain our bars dry

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 13 March 2008
MY business lies in the very middle of the now closed and near deserted road called Shandwick Place. I am the licensee of Au Bar.
I am exasperated for two reasons: the devastating impact of the closure on my business and the lack of resources committed to the works.

To date, there has been no work whatsoever in the half of the closed area from Canning Street to Manor Place.
This area is being used as a car and van park. I can see no justification for this part to be closed. On only one day has there been any work in front of my pub. The area worked was approximately 1/6th of the width of the road. On Monday, there was one digger working a tiny area outside Somerfield supermarket.

I have been told repeatedly that the closure was necessary for safety reasons. If you are only working in such limited areas, it is abundantly clear that the road could have been kept open (even if just for buses and taxis) without compromising safety.

If you are adamant that the road remains closed, then at least have workers engaged on the whole length of the road.

It is difficult to be optimistic about this venture given the way it has been managed to date. Whether my business can survive five months of this slow torture is debatable.

Jim Gow, Au Bar


Nuisance merits a quick finish to job

I SEE from the Evening News ("Busy roundabout to be replaced causing further disruption", March 11) that travellers on the east side of the city are in for more misery this summer.

Perhaps someone could explain to me why it will take five months to complete this work when the roundabout at Leith Walk and London Road appeared to be removed in about five days.

Granted the King's Road roundabout might be a slightly larger job, but it seems that the council has not learned anything from the disruption at Milton Link; it would be interesting to know if there was even any investigation of the extent of the delays caused by this work.

The cost in congestion and pollution from traffic going nowhere must surely justify the resources to get the job completed as quickly as possible – seven days a week if necessary.

Jim Nisbet, Kenmure Avenue, Edinburgh


Concerned about safety in the street

AS a resident of Gordon Street, which joins Manderston Street (i.e. Easter Road end is Gordon Street and the Leith Walk end is Manderston Street) I would like to express my grave concerns about the diversion and the fact that having spoken to many of my fellow residents and garage owners, none of us had heard about this.

Gordon Street/Manderston Street is a very busy street as it is, with the traffic from the Mecca bingo hall and the garages. This will be made far more dangerous for the residents especially as there are sheltered housing complexes at both ends of the street.

As a parent of two young children I feel that there will be a major risk of someone being killed as the street is not meant for buses and the kind of traffic that will be going along it.

This has been kept very quiet and the children in the street will not be able to play safely in their own street, or the old people be safe to go out and about safely.

Trish Mellon, Gordon Street, Edinburgh


Crèche cut a tough decision to make

WITH reference to Edinburgh Leisure's decision to downscale creches in its sports facilities, the quote I issued in the press statement was as follows: "Edinburgh Leisure's main job is to provide sports facilities – not childcare. Thirteen pounds per customer for each visit is a huge subsidy and one that isn't sustainable when we are getting the council's finances back on an even keel. If it wasn't the crèches then they would have to stop doing one of their core activities."

My concern was that Edinburgh Leisure may resort to attempting to close one of its core facilities such as Leith Waterworld (which had been suggested) and feel that direct leisure provision to the user had to be protected if possible.

Regrettably the budget had to be trimmed and tough decisions have to be taken. Unfortunately this was one of them and Edinburgh Leisure's choices were restricted.

Steve Cardownie, deputy council leader, City Chambers, High Street, Edinburgh


Scotland will be loser with local tax

THERE are many deep arguments against a local income tax – for example, the variations between each local authority makes the local income tax even more regressive than the present council tax banding system.

Local income tax rates would be an advantage to the wealthy areas and a disadvantage to the poorer areas. A local income tax would be complex and costly to administrate.

Scotland will lose out on block grants and as the local income tax is a different system than is used for the rest of the UK less revenue would be available for the health services, education and social health care.

Chas Dennis, Niddrie Marischal Road, Edinburgh


Trident blows up housing chances

IN the 1980s the Conservatives sold off the council housing stock. In the late 1990s till last year Labour did nothing to replace the sold-off housing.

In 2008, it falls to the SNP to address the shortage in housing. However, since "devolution" still means the Scottish Government has to beg the money from Gordon Brown in London, and since he is busy spending billions on nuclear power and Trident, it looks like still nothing will be done about housing.

Trevor Swistchew, The Paddockholm, Edinburgh


Why not line up bid for the QE2?

I LEARNED with regret from your article of March 6 that the great liner QE2 was to be sold to the Dubai World Co. Surely it wasn't beyond the bounds of possibility that the Scottish Government would have made a bid for this great liner. After all, it was only a measly £50 million.

Considering the monies squandered in setting up the Edinburgh tram initiative and the Waverley line.

This great liner the last to be built on the Clyde belonged to Scotland and I think a delegation led possibly by Alex Salmond should make a direct appeal to the Dubai Government for the chance to bring this great icon of Scottish endeavour home where she belongs.

Something to be proud of, and an inspiration.

Joe Gardner, Cortleferry Grove, Dalkeith







Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 13 March 2008 8:22 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

familymanwith2jobsandawifeworkingfulltime,

Edinburgh 13/03/2008 13:00:35
Regarding the proposed local income tax, I worked until past nine o'clock last night, after starting at 8.00am, trying to build a better life for myself and my family. (I have two jobs, my wife works full time and we have a young son with disabilities)

"A fairer local tax for Scotland" - what is fair about the SNP proposing to fleece my wife and I of 3% of our extra hard earned cash. If everyone worked as hard as each other, a local tax would be fair - irrespective of their income. However people don't work as hard as each other - some work their fingers to the bone, some work part time and others don't even work at all. A local income tax would therefore be a tax on hard work. What on earth is fair about that????

I was brought up to believe that the only way to get on in life was by hard work - its just so wrong and sad, that no longer seems to be the case.
2

Speedy Gonzales,

Edinburgh 13/03/2008 14:48:58
To be fair, Au Bar was never a busy place, so it wouldn't require too many patrons not to go for them to notice a large downturn in trade.
Incidentally, during the last 2 weekends, since the works began, the places that I have visited/used in Shandwick place seem as busy as ever(pret a manger/boots/sommerfield).
3

Merouane,

Edinburgh 13/03/2008 14:56:37
Chas Dennis: "A local income tax would be complex and costly to administrate".

Perhaps someone can help me out here. I was under the impression that the council tax had a much lower collection rate and a much higher admin cost than income tax. Surely the LIT could/would be collected through the same mechanisms as IT, meaning savings on that admin and an increase in the collection rate. Does anyone know if this is truly the case?
4

Dragonlord,

13/03/2008 15:01:25
Scallywag. The manager of the bar was writting to a newspaper letters page. Do you think it appropriate he should include his tax return? If he claims his business is suffering, why can't you take that at face value?

Your support for the tram LINE, makes you look like you are one of the few who will make money from it.
5

Shaun McDonald,

Edinburgh 13/03/2008 15:51:12
The local income tax is fairer because it is based on the ability to pay, rather than the the supposed value of your house. I would need to be earning at least £42,000 per year before I would be worse off, than at the moment with the council tax. By the time I'm earning that much I would be able to afford to pay more anyway.

Is the HMRC claiming that they would go against the Scotland act that says that we Scots can vary the level of income tax by 3p in the pound? If so they are breaking the law!
6

Dragonlord,

13/03/2008 17:41:32
12# Unfortunatley the pain involved in the tram line is far too great. The 22 bus was running fine and to remove it for trams is stupid. TIE's own propoganda suggests a reduction of only 1% in congestion.Recently LRT bought 32 new buses and had they the foresight to make their propution LPG, then pollution would also have been reduced. So the arguemant FOR trams doesn't make sense, if you take into account, congestion,pollution or cost.
7

Jingling Geordie,

Sunshine on Leith 13/03/2008 18:38:44
In five years time when I qualify for the State Pension, that pension will, in it's entireity, go to pay my Council Tax leaving me with a small personal pension on which to survive........is this fair?
Alternatively I could have invested in a more modest property holidayed three times a year and went boozing and smoking every night of the week and had my council tax paid for me.............roll out local income tax.
8

GraemeH,

Edinburgh 14/03/2008 00:00:12
#16 - TIE has spent tens of millions trying to justify an inherently flawed proposal, making the figures fit while excluding a huge amount of downsides.

The business plan is a joke and it is a disgrace that our politicians did not subject it to even basic financial scrutiny. The minute someone added up the sums and realised it would cost £500m+ to effectively replace the 22 bus with a tram the project should have been killed.

Scotland is not so rich it can afford to waste hundreds of millions on such vanity projects. Yet all too many of our politicians think we should.
9

James (1),

14/03/2008 20:47:49
The council provide sports facilities not child care facilities.
This is a fact that a few mothers cannot accept. Strange but true!

Perhaps the council should run "how to look after your own child classes" and "paying for services".

Here is free tip- get your husband/partner to watch the child while you use the sports facilities.
Shared responsibility, how off the wall is this concept?
That way it costs nothing instead of you wanting the council to sponser your child care needs.

I do wish these mothers would stop wanting strangers to pay for looking after their children.

Perhaps the topic of responsibility to your child should be introduced in sex education at school?

With topics such as 1- Do you know that YOU will actually have to look after your own baby?

2-The council is NOT your private baby minder!

Such shocking facts might make prospective mothers think twice when the reality that strangers are not meant to pay for your children but you are.

10

blackgirlsandwichedbetweentwowhitegirlsinclass,

geography class, flexi 11/12/2008 15:44:40
we are truley disgusted with the comments left from these people, especially the dispicable dragon lord and the unholy graeme h.

in the words of 2pac "only god can judge me."
11

blackgirlsandwichedbetweentwowhitegirlsinclass,

11/12/2008 15:46:15
here james.

WE AGREE. YOU ARE A LEGEND TO ALL WOMEN.

thankyou
12

blackgirlsandwichedbetweentwowhitegirlsinclass,

11/12/2008 15:46:26
here james.

WE AGREE. YOU ARE A LEGEND TO ALL WOMEN.

thankyou

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.