Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Wednesday, 4th November 2009 Change Date Latest Issue

Repair bill for bridge doubles up to £13.7m

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 October 2008
THE cost of major repairs planned for the Forth Road Bridge next year has more than doubled, transport chiefs revealed today.
Joints, which allow the bridge to expand and contract, need replacing because they have come to the end of their life span.

Bridge bosses will build temporary ramps – dubbed "mini-bridges" – over all the structure's joints to allow traffic to travel over them and avoid round-the-clock lane closures when the project gets under way next autumn.

But the £13.7 million winning tender for the work is up on the £5.9m cost originally anticipated for the project and bridge operator Feta is now facing a £5m shortfall, and will lobby the Scottish Government for the extra cash despite having £2.9m in its own reserves.

The "mini-bridges" element accounts for just under half of the overall cost and Feta today said the specialist nature of the job had increased the costs.

Closures on the 44-year-old bridge would cost the Scottish economy around £650,000 a day in terms of user delays.

Des McNulty MSP, Labour's transport spokesman, said: "This is the first of a number of problems that Feta will have, following on from the decision to remove tolls, that it can't address through its own tolling revenue or money borrowed against future revenue.

"We now have a situation where any unanticipated maintenance work can only be done after Feta has gone cap in hand to the Government, and the real concern will come if there is an urgent piece of work which is outwith the Feta budget, but they have to wait on the Government."

The expansion joint project was last year estimated at £5.9m but, by June this year, officials preparing tenders for the project revised that to £8.7m to allow for the increasing cost of steel and labour.

The winning tender from Balfour Beatty Civil Engineering was actually £1.3m more than the bid from English firm C Spencer Ltd, but bridge bosses went with them as they came out on top for quality during its assessments.

Barry Colford, the Forth Road Bridge's chief engineer, said: "We engaged an experienced firm of consulting engineers to estimate the cost of this job, but the disparity between their estimate and the actual bids demonstrates just how unpredictable the costs of carrying out maintenance works on large bridges without major disruption to traffic can be.

"This job in particular is unique, so there's very little to compare it to. The joints we're replacing are the oldest and largest of their kind in Europe and, to keep the traffic flowing during the works, we've come up with an engineering solution that is a first for a major suspension bridge."

The work is due to be carried out in two phases of ten weeks in autumn 2009 and spring 2010.

This means that two lanes in each direction would remain open throughout most of the works.

However, four-day carriageway closures would still be required in order to construct and dismantle the temporary bridges at the start and finish of each phase. Only one lane would be open in each direction during these periods.

Councillor Tony Martin, convener of Feta, said: "It's essential that we find a way to deliver this maintenance project as planned.

"Our engineers have come up with a genuinely creative and innovative solution to keep the traffic flowing, and the work is vital in order to keep the bridge safe and open to traffic."

Inspection discovers cracks in crucial nuts

ENGINEERS are investigating after cracks were found in the heavy duty nuts used to secure the steel ropes which hold up the Forth Road Bridge.

Nine out of a total of 1888 of the nuts – which are 35mm in diameter – were found to be cracked during a routine inspection and have been sent for tests.

Four nuts have already been replaced and the other five will be replaced during the coming year using access platforms in place as part of ongoing work on the main cables.

Consulting engineers FaberMaunsell have been appointed to investigate the cause of the cracking but bridge chiefs have said the bridge remains safe.

Barry Colford, chief engineer and bridge master at the Forth Road Bridge, said: "These bolt assemblies are inspected as part of the bridge's programme of routine maintenance and inspection. Thanks to the vigilance of our inspection team the problem has been identified at an early stage and we're already taking steps to replace the damaged nuts and investigate whether any further action is required.

"The bridge remains perfectly safe."


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 October 2008 2:12 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Forth Bridges
 
1

alex paterson,

edinburgh 03/10/2008 12:11:01
What this bridge has cost since surveys started,a new bridge could have been built.
2

,

03/10/2008 12:17:04
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Dick C. Normuss,

03/10/2008 12:56:39
Why not introduce tolls on the bridge to help pay for the repairs?
4

gorgie resident,

03/10/2008 13:04:59
you mean re introduce the tolls on the bridge that Mr Salmand & co stopped.
5

Desperately Seeking.......a solution,

03/10/2008 13:05:42
Maybe the should introduce "permits" for bridge users....say, £10,000 each.......but only if you live in Fife...
6

Duncan in Edinburgh,

03/10/2008 13:12:28
"Closures on the 44-year-old bridge would cost the Scottish economy around £650,000 a day in terms of user delays."

Utter utter utter utter utter utter utter made up nonsense.
7

The Lone Haranguer,

03/10/2008 13:45:47
Right you lot. Be nice to Duncan today. After all, he is Craigmillar's only living taxpayer.
8

Duncan in Edinburgh,

03/10/2008 14:06:21
#7 Haha! *narrows eyes*
9

Heretic_,

03/10/2008 15:29:41
#9 Good point - the £5 million that's needed for the bridge would pay for about 200 yards of the M74. And I'm not exaggerating.
10

Incandescent,

03/10/2008 16:31:49
I think everyone should just keep calm and wait until we receive divine direction from D Napier.
11

Forthtag,

South Queensferry 03/10/2008 16:37:03
FETA and Faber Maunsell(FM)are these not the same team who said they could build a second bridge for £290m. This estimate was nearly 2000% out if you can believe Transport Scotland!

Will this QUANGO ever wake up to reality? Every thing they have estimated in recent years has an extra zero on the end when the tenders are received?

Why are C Spencer Ltd being kicked into touch after years of service?

£1.3m is a big quality gap given that the contractor's overheads would be half this sum!

For those in the know the suspension rope problem has been known about for over six months, so much for their prompt observations. What they are not telling the public is that these items were all renewed in recent years at considerable cost to the travelling pub!

So did someone not do the job properly?

FETA drip feeding bad news to the public again and on a Friday Tut tut!

Was this new contract given to FM competitively tendered or is it like so many awards within the discretionary £25,000 that the bridge master is allowed to spend?

Barry Colford says "the bridge is safe"

Could I ask him "Is this his estimate?"

FETA should be disbanded and the management put out to competitive tender, that way the government might get the proper answers to the many questions still surrounding the integrity of the bridge. Questions like "what condition are the anchorages in and can they be repaired?"

Is there any credibility left, who would miss another "non accountable" Quango?
12

Brodric,

03/10/2008 17:58:50
If an independent Scotland were in the EU, would we get a structural grant for this.

The bridge must be repaired. I think scrapping the toll was a bit short sighted, it was quite cheap really.
13

D Napier,

03/10/2008 19:46:56
#12. Forthtag.

Yet again you ar spreading misinformation. If you read the FETA board report on their website you will see that some of their contracts do come in on budget.

You really are a conspiracy theorist aren't you. Audit Scotland and FETA, what other bodies do you think are out to get you?

I reaslly am amazed that you are having a go at TiE for the trams project. Of course you won't because it doesn't come anywhere near South Queensferry.
14

Ian down under,

Musselburgh 03/10/2008 20:53:16
Let the train take the strain. Their bridge is still going strong after 118 years. A few more coaches on each train would move more than the road bridge ever could.
15

Supermac,

Edinburgh 06/10/2008 16:45:56
Forthtag aka Mr Carson- I thought you'd died of terminal embarassment after the drivel you spouted about the tunnel was comprehensively demolished through clear facts (even ignored by your buddies in government after they realised the scale of your propaganda).

Anything about the bridge and you know better- it does seem you hold a personal grudge but seeing as Alastair Andrew (who stood up to your nonsense publicly) has gone, then why carry on your petty vendetta?
16

Heretic_,

06/10/2008 20:15:41
#12 Forthtag

Quit yer greeting - you lost the argument over the tunnel, now get over it!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.