Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Monday, 2nd November 2009 Change Date Latest Issue

Patients forced to move again as care home faces bulldozers

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 September 2008
A CARE company is seeking to demolish a nursing home that East Lothian Council paid £300,000 to have refurbished.
The council leased Greenfield Park Care Home in Musselburgh to house elderly residents earlier this year after the troubled Cockenzie House Nursing Home closed.

Now owners, Forth Care, want to demolish the home and build a larger one in the ground
s and council officials are recommending they be given permission.

The news has sparked anger among residents' families, who say that their relatives have already undergone the trauma of one move and have hit out at the council for wasting taxpayers' money on the refurbishment.

Fourteen neighbours have objected to the plans, which have also been opposed by the Greenfield Park Residents' Association.

Don Sowden, of Port Seton, whose 83-year-old wife Dorothy is cared for at Greenfield Park, said the news was "unbelievable". She has already moved twice this year, first from Cockenzie House and then from Tranent Nursing Home.

He said: "I just don't understand this. They've spent an awful lot of money on Greenfield Park. It's been fully refurbished and they only opened in March this year.

"Where are they going to put the residents when they've demolished the home? There isn't enough space to keep it open and build a new one at the same time.

"I'm very worried about my wife. This year has been very traumatic, and she's only just got settled in Greenfield Park. I'm very happy with the care she's getting there."

Rev Robert Glover, the former chairman of the Cockenzie House Action Group, said he was concerned that moving the residents again would harm their health.

He said: "This is very sad, but nothing would surprise me any more with regard to the care of these elderly people. More than half of them have already died since Cockenzie House closed."

East Lothian Council took out a three-year lease on the home, after the owner of Cockenzie House Nursing Home decided to close it. The Care Commission had criticised the home and imposed a ban on new admissions.

Around 20 of the residents were moved to Greenfield Park, a derelict home which was given a full upgrade. But now Forth Care wants to demolish the home when the lease is up.

In its application, it states: "There has been a series of care home closures in East Lothian, and there is a demand for additional care home beds.

"Rather than alter the existing buildings again, we are proposing a modern care home that will comply with the latest standards and provide an additional 15 beds at the same location. It is envisaged that the proposed care home will also be a major improvement on the unsightly collection of existing buildings."

An East Lothian council spokesman said it had taken a lease for three years, and no work would start before the end of 2011. The application will be heard by councillors tomorrow.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 September 2008 11:10 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: East Lothian
 
1

elayne,

01/09/2008 13:32:04
this is unfair to residents,especially those who are perhaps confused and may be upset at all the upheavel of having to move again
2

alex paterson,

edinburgh 01/09/2008 15:24:30
I feel sorry for these old buddies,half them have no idea whats going on anyway but this is no help to them.
3

It's life but not as we know it,

The Oort Clouds 01/09/2008 16:01:35
Just read Private Eye: Labour has to give billions of pounds to crooked companies to run it's obscene PFI scams so these poor old folk will just get dumped on the sidelines. Thanks unelected Gordon.
4

GMc,

edinburgh 01/09/2008 21:04:47
This is a disgrace. Moving 2/3 times in one year would be traumatic for anyone, never mind people in their 80's. The council should be hanging their heads in shame.
Lets not forget about the money they have effectively wasted too!
5

Kitti Kat,

Newtown Square 01/09/2008 21:11:14
Why can't they build an addition to the existing structure? It would more than likely be cheaper than starting from scratch and the patients would not be traumatized nearly as much as another move would cause. Talk about wasting taxpayers money!!!!!And un-feeling people who allow this to go on should be ashamed. Wait until they have to place a parent or loved one in a home. They willbe the first to scream.
6

The Geniune Mario Antionette,

01/09/2008 22:06:42
#5 - they did something similar in the Highland Clearances - money. Thers no profit in keeping old folk.
7

elayne,

01/09/2008 22:38:33
in a lot of these homes its a case of bums on seats=more money for owners,when money should be spent on better facilities for the old folk in existing homes and higher quality off food,activities,training of staff etc
8

Mr Fuzzy,

Edinburgh 02/09/2008 00:00:12
Supermarkets are capable of expanding yet staying open at the same time. They build the outer surface of the new building around the old building, then demolish the walls of the old building. Why can't the care home do the same?
9

lucky girl,

cockenzie 02/09/2008 10:09:33
Well I agree with the comments it is about time the council and care companies lived in the real world, its people's lives at stake. If only East Lothian Council had listened to the friends and relatives of Cockenzie Nursing Home and helped instead of hindering the owner the elderly of East Lothian would still be happy and contented and maybe some of the deaths that happened after the closure would not have happened. We are all taxpayers and cannot afford to waste money as they have done.
10

Koshka,

East Lothian 03/09/2008 06:42:28
This report from Hazel Mollison is innacurate.

This report is liable to cause anxiety to residents/their families.

Greenfield Park Care Home was not derelict atthe time it was taken on by East Lothian. It had been used by City of Edinburgh until early in 2008 pending development of their own home.

East Lothian have done refurbishment and have a 3 year lease.

The building is not due for imminent demolition/redevelopment. The residents who already had to move from Cockenzie because the owner did not comply with Care Commission requests are not due to be moved again.

The request is to build a more up to date, purpose built care home in the future. New regulations want single en suite rooms which Greenfield Park didnt have.

The application is still to be determined by East Lothian Councillors.
11

jenny,

somewhere east of edinburgh 03/09/2008 11:52:36
I don't have a problem with the content of the article - it appears to state the facts of the matter - i.e. nothing will happen for at least 3 years as East Lothian Council have leased the property for that time.

However, the headline seems to have been written to attract attention and alarm but if you stop to read the article, all becomes quite clear.
12

jarmon,

06/09/2008 09:25:33
Everyday i x-ray residents at nursing homes (you'd be surprised how many of them fall down at quitting time).A modern care home would be a good idea.It would improve the morale of the residents.You can slap a coat of paint on a hovel,but to many residents it's still a hovel.More private rooms is also a good idea.Some residents in a semi private become mates and depend on each other.But some hate being in a semi private room and would beat their roommate with a walking cane if they could just pick it up high enough.
13

Loth the builder,

11/09/2008 22:47:48
*I think my grandmother might have liked the "potential" new nursing home but unfortunately she died within a few weeks of being shunted out of the Cockenzie nursing home. Pity !!! Still I'm sure the cooncil and care commission knew best *
14

Ian down under,

Musselburgh 15/09/2008 04:33:41
My father was one of the lucky ones from Cockenzie. He was able to move to another good care home and is doing well. We don't forget the people who have been less fortunate and we still want real, honest answers from the various official bodies, including the council and the Care Commission.
We really have to ask the question, are we seeing corruption going on here and could we have some transparency into ALL the dealings of these bodies and the way they are sp;ending hard earned taxpayer money.
If Greenfield needs rebuilding then why were we told that it was going to be the ideal and up to date replacement for Cockenzie. I think we are now clearly seeing that we were being lied to all the way through this sham process.
Any Care Commission resignations yet and if none, why are there none?
15

A. Puschkin,

Edinburgh 28/01/2009 16:14:46
I must be very stupid ... but couldn't East Lothian Council have given The owner of Cockenzie Nursing Home £300,000 to make the nominal improvements that were required to meet the Care Standards demands? One problem was a lid for a bin? Another problem was the limited choice on the menu? £300,000 would have covered this and left some funds free for other up-gradings.

The residents and their families and friends, the local MP, GPs and the local Minister would have been happier too..... and many of the residents might still be alive.

Moving elderly people when they are healthy is a stress. Moving elderly and fragile people is a killer.
.....................................................
FORTH CARE - a company is seeking to demolish a nursing home that East Lothian Council paid £300,000 to have refurbished.

The council leased Greenfield Park Care Home in Musselburgh to house elderly residents earlier this year after the troubled Cockenzie House Nursing Home closed.
.......................................................

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.