Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Wednesday, 9th December 2009 Change Date

'Big money does not buy election victories'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 08 December 2007
WHEN Stagecoach tycoon Brian Souter announced his £500,000 donation to the SNP earlier this year, he said it was to "redress the imbalance" in political finances which saw pro-union parties funded from London while the Nationalists lacked resources.
The spending figures for the main parties in last May's elections, just published by the Electoral Commission, show Mr Souter achieved his objective. The SNP was able to treble its campaign expenditure compared with the last Scottish Parliament elect
ions in 2003 and outspend Labour for the first time. They spent a total of £1,383,462 as against Labour's £1,102,866, the Tories' £601,983 and the Liberal Democrats' £303,740.

The Electoral Commission even pointed out the SNP and Labour were now coming close to the legal limit for election expenditure.

And the SNP's spending helped produce the desired result, getting an extra 20 Nationalist MSPs elected to Holyrood, making them the biggest party in the parliament and allowing them to form a government.

Questions might be asked about whether it is healthy that one wealthy individual can appear to have such an impact on the democratic process. But Mr Souter is not the first rich businessman to put vast sums into a political party and he won't be the last. The whole question of party funding, including limits on donations and caps on spending, is almost certain to be examined again in the wake of the dodgy donations rows north and south of the border.

But it is worth remembering large sums of cash do not always translate into victories at the polls. The Liberal Democrats spent more than any of the other parties in Edinburgh at the Holyrood elections, but failed to win their two target seats in the city.

Essentially the Nationalists' strong national performance on May 3 was largely down to a mood for change and clever wording on the List ballot paper which helped propel them into power. Money no doubt helps get messages across, but pouring cash into a campaign does not guarantee success - as other parties found to their cost.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 December 2007 9:25 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Hhahahhaa,

08/12/2007 13:53:51

Lets also not forget that the vast majority of Labours cash came not from Scotland but from England.

2

Brian M,

Oxford 08/12/2007 14:16:59

well done to Soutar for levelling the playing field of Scottish politics and giving Scottish (sic) Labour a giant kick up the @rse

3

,

08/12/2007 14:32:42
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
4

cheuchtar,

08/12/2007 14:43:24

The money obviously helped,but SNP won because people were sick and disgusted with entrenched Labour sleaze.For example the East Lothian shenanigans with the massive expenses of the local MP and the £150,000 buckshee payout to the local councillor leader.

5

,

08/12/2007 14:45:22
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

,

08/12/2007 14:50:39
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

,

08/12/2007 15:01:15
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

,

08/12/2007 15:10:09
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
9

,

08/12/2007 15:51:06
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

I'm no really here,

08/12/2007 16:28:41

My goodness, what hypocrisy, not only from the article but from the pro-Labour/anti-SNP posters, Ciderman and AM2 What's wrong. Is it only permissable for Labour and Tory parties to get large donations and spend them. £500,000 and much more is given by individuals to both of those parties on a regular basis.

The Labourman and the Labour Evening News are really trying very hard to act as a shield for Wendy. Makes you wonder just what this great effort is for. Is there MORE to be revealed??

What a shame that the Labour Evening News can only come up with Ciderman and AM2.

11

kimba,

08/12/2007 16:54:27

16. merry christmas to you, and naw, alex is a lucky so and so,but not Scotlands moses.

12

Methspain,

08/12/2007 17:23:15

7. Ciderman 542000, Forres / 2:45pm 8 Dec 2007

"I forgot about the knighthood too; what's the betting it will be Sir Brian Soutar sometime? All that has to be worked out is the pretext for the "K."
Alec Salmond will no doubt give odds on that specific outcome."

Erm it's the UK parliament that does this ...or the queen ya numpty.

13

Methspain,

08/12/2007 17:29:36

...and if Brian Soutar (sic) is nominated, the wrong guy will get the gong. The name's Souter....with an "e".

14

,

08/12/2007 17:39:06
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

subrosa,

08/12/2007 17:56:54

Go on AM2, tell me who else in Scotland could provide a hovercraft service over the Forth? I'm sure there are plenty businesses in this global market that would provide it but think it would cost a great deal more than £92,000 for a trial. There again AM2 you've possibly got a wee eastern european company somewhere that would do it for less. As has been said Brian Soutar donated less than labour or conservative donors. Time to give a bit credit where credit's due. The man put his money where his mouth is and not his mouth where money is.

16

Toast,

08/12/2007 18:09:27

Cancel all TV advertising,billboards etc and make the candidates knock on doors and address public meeting,£1000 should cover leaflet costs,if they want to spend more they can pay themselves,who really cares the vast majority of MP's and MSP's are incompetent or corrupt or both.

17

north east loon,

peterhead 08/12/2007 18:14:23

There is one biggish difference between the Labour/Tory/Liberals and the SNP.

The SNP advertise their doners - if I remember correctly Salmond flourished the Souter donation at an SNP Conference.

Labour conceal everthing - eg loans for Lords, multiple donations, the Wendy below the radar campaign, friends of Labour etc,etc

Tories operate similar group organisations for donors to conceal their names eg Midlands industrial council.

Liberals were none too keen on revealing the guy who went to the clink and got the money via setting up companies.

In contrast what is the complaint about Souter whose donations are perfectly open and above board?

Finally didn't the money for the hovercraft trial -which strikes me as a good idea - come from the last Executive not the current Government - still let's not allow a few facts to get in the way of a good smear!

18

kimba,

08/12/2007 19:40:11

27. you can have what you like,'cos it aint happening, the EU will see to that.

19

Kipling,

Back in the library 08/12/2007 23:00:14

#29. I've read the link & am presently clearing up the sick. The EU is driven by businessmen , ambitious politicians including those who've failed back home but need to keep up with the mortgage payments on their expensive properties, ex-communist administrators. EU democracy is expensive, look at the cost of the Brussels-Strasbourg move. I've not met anyone associated with it that doesn't retch at its bureaucracy. There's no choice for voting for regulations imposed from on high. At least the UK parties have voluntarily made donations, unlike the way the EU machinery is funded.

20

The Judge',

The Inch 08/12/2007 23:49:48

I had an election recently, and it didnt cost me much.

21

subrosa,

09/12/2007 00:56:47

#30 I don't get your point AM2. What are you complaining about? The fact that taxpayer's money was put into a trial hovercraft scheme in order to see if it would be a success? Or is it that any permanent scheme would be subsidised by government? It has been proven that the trial was a success as many found it helped make their journey less stressful. The government subsidises me to travel on buses throughout Scotland. Do you object to that? I expect so. Really don't know where you're coming from on this one other than you have a preference for another company to provide this service.

22

Auckland Arab2,

09/12/2007 01:09:15

#10

Get your facts right potato muncher. Your constitutional convention "rail roaded" the trams through.


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.