Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Saturday, 5th December 2009 Change Date

New scheme aims to stop 300 people becoming homeless

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 June 2009
A NEW scheme launched in Edinburgh aims to find places to live for up to 300 people on the brink of homelessness.
The Letfirst service provides accommodation in private rented properties for people who cannot get council housing but are said to be at risk of becoming homeless.

The scheme is to be run by Orchard & Shipman after it won a tender to provide an a
ssisted private rental scheme as part of the council's drive to tackle the problem.

Letfirst offers rents at a normal market rate but tenants do not have to pay a deposit or three months' rent in advance, which the company says removes some of the common barriers that prevent some people finding accommodation in the private rental market.

It is to be used as part of a range of measures to tackle the Capital's affordable housing crisis.

Demand for affordable housing is so acute that on average 150 people chase each council home that becomes available. In 2008-9, 4,858 made applications for housing to the council on the basis that they were on the brink of homelessness.

Angela McLachlan, director of operations at Orchard & Shipman, said: "We anticipate that, given the shortage of housing in Edinburgh, we can make a dent and provide good quality affordable accommodation and help people that the private sector has not traditionally helped."

When a landlord agrees to let Letfirst manage their property, they are securing themselves a regular rental income of up to five years.

Tenants would normally be expected to be referred by housing associations, charities or the city council, making it the first assisted private scheme used in Scotland.

An interview takes place to establish that the individual is at risk of homelessness and is not able to pay the normal deposit and rent in advance.

John Taylor, chief executive of Orchard & Shipman, said: "Letfirst is testimony to the innovative approach the City of Edinburgh Council has taken to bring about meaningful changes to the provision of homes throughout the city."

The council has been credited with virtually eradicating homelessness in recent years. Recent estimates suggest that only around 10 people sleep rough in the city.

But it has now turned its focus on a new early prevention initiative. The new approach by the council is aimed at helping those on the cusp of losing their home and follows an increase in demand for housing advice from people who have had their homes repossessed.

Councillor Paul Edie, the city's housing leader, said: "We recently commissioned a number of services which aim to tackle problems around homelessness in the city, specifically preventing people from becoming homeless in the first place.

"The shortfall of affordable housing in the city means we cannot meet the needs of all those facing homelessness using solely council-owned or housing association properties."

He added: "Letfirst is an innovative project which will allow those who would not normally be able to consider the private rented sector to do so."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 June 2009 9:38 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Homelessness
 
1

Rv2!,

12/06/2009 11:14:08
Another cr ap extension to their current PSL rent.

My rent is £940 per month for a 300SqFt one bedroom flat. The landlord sees under £400 of that. Everything else goes to the Council and, Orchard and Shipman.

This service does help people who otherwise would be homeless, but it is a trap that actively stops people being able to move on in their life.
2

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

12/06/2009 12:28:24
If there's such a shortage of housing, why don't we get more built? It's not as if the housebuilders are exactly overflowing with work at the moment.
3

elayne,

12/06/2009 12:41:04
#1 that is an awful lot of money for a 1 bed flat!
more council houses need to be built without a doubt,at reasonable rental prices,espec for those hit with problems in current financial climate
4

alfonsa pedrosa,

embra 12/06/2009 13:27:54
Give the all little tents and a patch in the Pentland Hills,all they will have to do is cut the grass.
5

upthehill,

Leith 12/06/2009 16:46:04
There they go again - trumpeting a £3million cut in homeless services as progress, and for the good of the service provision. Rough sleeping in the city is already on the rise since their "seamless transfer" of services - it'll keep on rising no matter much spin & doublespeak they put their crippling cuts to the voluntary sector.

6

uncle josef,

the streets 12/06/2009 17:08:30
rough sleeping down a joke they should look at the councils own stats instead of the hype the vaulted new services are currenty not makeing any impact because they are reducing the skilled labour pool and slashing staff wages if the applied the same theory to policeing doe anyone actually believe that crime would be reduced so why believe homeless will be reduced
7

gus1940,

Edinburgh 12/06/2009 18:22:48
What about the long suffering owners of neighouring properties who have to suffer the effects of burglary, vandalism, drug dealing and other anti-social behaviour of these poor souls.

This scheme is a disgrace - we regularly get PR puffs in the press for it saying everybody is a winner - The Council, The Landlords and the Homeless but nobody ever mentions the suffering of the neighbours when riffraff are dumped on their doorsteps in what used to be quiet, respectable, safe neighbourhoods.

8

Evia,

13/06/2009 02:55:31
#8 gus1940

Excellent post. Many of these homeless have brought it on themselves through not paying rent or being anti-social neighbours. My daughter lived above horrendous anti-social neighbours whose rent was paid for by DSS. It took years for them to get moved and, until they moved, the other neighbours had a miserable time. Neither the Council nor the letting agents would do anything about the situation.

I have every sympathy for those who have become homeless through losing their jobs and not being able to pay the mortgage but I have no time for scum who spend all their money on booze, cigarettes, drugs etc.
9

bluehead,

edinburgh 13/06/2009 08:17:27
what !!more crazy schemes,some of things they dig up are pathetic.
10

Rainbow V,

Edinburgh 13/06/2009 09:44:07
#8 Not all people who are homeless are 'scum'. Common small minded perceptions that homeless people are criminals and drug dealers are quite far from the truth in a lot of cases.

It just shows how easy it is to take everything you wouldnt like in a person and blame it on the homeless guy who has been given a flat next to you.

What would it take for people to open their minds a tiny bit and see the person not the problem ?

I agree that this scheme creates a poverty trap rather than a solution. The Council should be using the money to build more affordable housing.
11

gus1940,

Edinburgh 13/06/2009 19:50:09
#11

Do you live in an area blighted by these people moving in?

I talk from bitter experience.
12

AliceT,

Edinburgh 29/11/2009 21:46:45
gus 1940

I empathise with you. I to have had major problems with these tenants - and it seems that ordinary law abiding, tax paying individuals have far less rights than the tenants causing the nuisance.

Having got rid of one set of problem tenants (after a year of sleepless nights) we have experienced a year of a "quiet let".......now that is over and once again we have constant noise, people coming and going at all times of the day and night, buzzers going, police visits and property damage. The laughable thing is I have to get up for work in the morning!!!!! .....my (new) neighbours don't!!!!!

Before anyone jumps on the band wagon I would like to point out that I have no problem with homeless people living in my stair if they live their lives quietly and cause no problems. What I object to is people who are unable to live beside others in a quiet dignified manner and cause all manner of bother to those tax paying people living beside them.

In addition - be warned - should your intercom system be broken by these tenants Orchard and Shipman will not replace them as they hide behind the "there's no proof our tenants did it". Another way for the cash strapped Edinburgh Council to save money leaving them with no incentive to build and provide homes for these people - if I lived in council property and the intercom system was broken they would have to fix it. If it's a private stair - they don't - it's the tax paying owners that have to fork out (even although we have already paid our taxes).

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.