Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Monday, 2nd November 2009 Change Date Latest Issue

Number of children put in care over 'emotional abuse' soars

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 April 2008
THE number of Edinburgh children put into care because their parents have "emotionally abused" them has almost doubled in a year.
New figures show 61 youngsters were put on the child protection register because of emotional abuse last year, compared with 37 in 2005-6.


The rise has been put down to the growing number of children being brought up by drug addicts.

There are 6000 addicts in Edinburgh and drug problems have been at the heart of high-profile child protection cases in recent years, including Caleb Ness, who was shaken to death by his brain-damaged father in Leith in 2001.

The 11-month-old had been left in the care of his father and drug-addicted mother.

But, as well as physical abuse, there are growing fears drugs are also causing parents to make their children feel worthless, unloved or inadequate.

Emotional abuse can also involve making a child feel frequently frightened or in danger, or the exploitation or corruption of children.

The growing levels of emotional abuse, which led to more than one youngster a week put on the child protection register in 2006-7, is a concern for children's charities.

Anne Houston, chief executive of Children 1st, said: "Unfortunately, many children in Scotland are growing up in very vulnerable situations.

"Emotional abuse is a factor in every case of physical or sexual abuse, but it can be hard to prove on its own.

"We know that children who are abused feel most of the pain on the inside.

"These figures may be a positive sign that more importance is being given to identifying and supporting children who have suffered from this highly-damaging, traumatic kind of abuse.

"However, it is not enough simply to rely on child protection agencies.

"Protecting children should be everyone's business, and we would like to see members of the extended family, friends and the wider community take responsibility for looking out for children."

Councillor Marilyne MacLaren, the city's children and families leader, said: "The reason for the increase is partly due to the rising number of parents who have problems linked to drug and alcohol abuse, which sadly too often leads to neglect.

"Early intervention is a key priority for the department and we are in constant communication with all of the other relevant agencies who work with us to ensure that we meet the needs of each individual child."

Councillor Andrew Burns, Labour children and families spokesman, said he believed at least part of the rise was down to better reporting and swifter action being taken by social workers.

"Any rise of that level is of initial concern – it does seem a fairly stark increase," he said.

"It is fair to say that reporting mechanisms are now much better used and better understood.

"After increasing in previous years, the total number of children taken into care appears to have levelled out at 235 in 2006-7, which was just two less than in 2005-6."

He added: "I don't take the view that the overall figure is too high. I think it's better that these issues are being dealt with rather than hidden."





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 April 2008 3:48 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Poetess50,

Dundee, UK 09/04/2008 13:07:33
"Protecting children should be everyone's business, and we would like to see...the wider community take responsibility for looking out for children."

WHY should this be my business? I made a decision NOT to have children as I did not want the responsibility, so why should I now take the responsibility for looking out for someone else's kids????
2

,

09/04/2008 13:31:55
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Xena - Warrior Princess,

09/04/2008 13:41:56
I'm glad that Social Services are doing their job. It's been a long time coming and a lot of children are already damaged by their parents addiction and selfishness. #1 I'm glad you took the decision not to have children.
4

tomias,

Edinburgh 09/04/2008 13:48:12
Thre are many women who chose not to have children- you can find many down in leith near the docks; not having kids has nothing to do with this article.
5

The faithful=,

Edinburgh 09/04/2008 14:07:57
I think a lot of people have kids too young,when i was 18 i was not even thinking of sleepness nights or nappies.My first of three was born when i was 29 when my husband and i felt we could support our kids emotionally and financially.Its so sad when you see kids being almost abandoned on the streets because the parent don't give a dam about what their doing.
6

,

09/04/2008 14:10:29
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

Lor,

Aberdeenshire 09/04/2008 15:18:16
Children need to be children - first and foremost - they are not to blame for their parents' actions but are often the victims or consequence of these actions. We all should protect them and help them to be - just children.
8

*raven*,

09/04/2008 20:12:03
i wondered how long it would take for someone to turn this into an attack on younger parents.
9

happyhibbie,

The inch, Edinburgh 09/04/2008 20:28:15
Glad to see that emotional abuse of children is being taken seriously at last. It's the most difficult type of assault on children to identify yet often scars the deepest.

I trust, number five, that you are now a very boring grandparent.
10

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 09/04/2008 21:26:22
*raven* @#8,

'Well-Said'!
Gotta go for the mo, helping DYW with her childcare course, but I will put my tuppence-worth here soon!
11

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 10/04/2008 00:42:22

First things First!!

"Number of children put in care over 'emotional abuse' soars"

Whilst in General, this is not good on the surface, it may well be conceived to be good that,
"emotional abuse" in our children is now being recognised by our authorities.

However what we DONT Want is,,

'Trigger-Happy'....'Social Services'!

As in the Child Screaming their, 'Heart-out' for an............ 'Ice-cream' and this being taken as,

"Emotional Abuse"!

As far as the comments on the parents age, being the factor of good,..'Child Rearing'

That's..'Absolute Nonsense' and dangerous soil to tread!

I was married young, had very little money and wealth, everyday we struggled, but our quality of Love and Care for our Girls, surpassed all!

This what counts! NOT, the Money or Age of the parents!

As for,,'Single Mums' the same goes, Mummy's Love and Care of their Child!
12

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 10/04/2008 00:49:45
As far as the 'Comments Removal' on here goes, is it not tragic, for on an issue such as this, anyone could put derogatory remarks that needed removed,?
13

Robert,

Kirriemuir 11/04/2008 00:14:50
'Emotional abuse' is a term that has an exceptionally wide interpretation. Many, from all classes and subcultures of society, are, to some extent, emotionally abused. Its interpretation is subject solely to a person's own perception which itself can be faulty, so to accuse others of it is hypocracy. It sounds almost as if the middle classes are attempting to impose their standards on the working classes. In the cases mentioned there may exist cases of child neglect, or parents being unsuited to care properly for their children, but there has to be concrete evidence without such the Local Authorities should not be committing children to care which is equally as harmful but less costly and cost is a crucial consideration even though it sounds unpopular.

Most people refer to chidren as kids; surely this term alone implies an arrogance and an indication of abuse even if it is only in attitude? There will be a cry from many who feel that it is merely an affectionate term, but, is it? Why the need to call children what they are not; they are certainly not kids! In these days of political correctness this is one term that should be banned! What an appalling word to call children. Some may say "You are wrong mister'! Well, if I am wrong, then I deny it, so which of us is right, and where does abuse start? If we cannot be certain about this minor but not inconsequential term, how then can others be indicted? I am not religious yet one is reminded of the biblical tale of the woman who was about to be stoned to death for adultery when a Nazarene stepped from the crowd and suggested to them that he who is without guilt should throw the first stone; and this wisdom equally applies today! The views expressed is tantamount to saying, 'All the world's a bit que.r except thee and me, and even thee is a bit odd'!

Start considering the views and feelings of those who have been through the 'care' system prior to committing any other child to this system of iniquity and injustice
14

Robert,

Kirriemuir 11/04/2008 00:16:22
Continued from above: "Has any research been done in this area to find if it has really benefitted anyone in later life or are we afraid that we might be told that we are selling a harmful product or that we might be abusing our authority. 'Emotional abuse' is too delicate and too vague a subject to use to commit children to years of further emotional neglect.

Just to prove my point, on submitting this post it was prevented as the word que.r was used; I guess I best not then use the word gay! This proves how the pious minds of some people think; so who is right and who is wrong? There is certainly no evil intent in my mind nor is there any ulterior motive yet I was banned from using a good Queen's English word taught in all schools (or is its usage banned today)".
15

,

11/04/2008 16:13:38
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

,

11/04/2008 16:17:45
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
17

,

11/04/2008 16:20:22
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
18

,

11/04/2008 16:23:01
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
19

,

11/04/2008 16:23:50
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
20

,

11/04/2008 16:24:44
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

,

11/04/2008 16:25:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
22

,

11/04/2008 16:33:01
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.