Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Monday, 23rd November 2009 Change Date

HBOS shareholders approve Lloyds TSB takeover

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 December 2008
HBOS shareholders today overwhelmingly approved the bank's takeover by Lloyds TSB and an £11.5 billion taxpayer-funded boost.
Based on votes cast before the meeting, the moves were supported by an 84 per cent majority of individual shareholders, and 98 per cent by the value of shares voted.

The combined bank is likely to be 43.5 per cent owned by the taxpayer following capital raising by HBOS and Lloyds TSB – leaving existing HBOS shareholders with just 20 per cent of the new bank.

The chairman of HBOS had earlier apologised for the ailing bank's plight.

Dennis Stevenson said the board was sorry about the financial impact of the crisis on investors and said he was "neither happy nor proud" as chairman.

He told the meeting in Birmingham – delayed for half an hour by a serious accident on the M6 – that the world was living through "the most pronounced financial crisis since the Great Depression".

The merger with Lloyds TSB will create a superbank with 145,000 staff and 3,000 branches.

HBOS, which posted another gloomy trading update today, was facing conditions "frankly more difficult by the day", Mr Stevenson said.

The Lloyds takeover has been opposed by some businessmen, but the board considered all alternatives, the chairman added.

"I cannot say too strongly that your board looked at every possible solution... we do not cede our independence lightly."

But investors voiced criticism of the bank's senior management.

Shareholder Peter Hapworth said he was "appalled" at how HBOS had been run in the last few years.

He said: "Let's face facts, it is a bank like yours along with a number of other banks that have caused the crisis in the first place. You all went dashing for short-term gain to fulfil bonuses and salaries."

Mr Hapworth said the banks were now trying to hide behind "the crisis that they had caused".

Another investor, Brian Lockley, said: "What I've heard so far reminds me of my old school reports – could do better."

Speakers expressed concerns over the pensions of the bank staff following the merger with Lloyds.

But the HBOS chairman said: "We are proud of the fact that the HBOS pension scheme is very well funded as I stand here today.

"We are confident that it will continue to be well funded, if not better funded, if the merger with Lloyds goes ahead."

Unions, fearful of thousands of job losses which could come as a result of the merger, protested outside the meeting today.

Protesters handed out mock ballot papers to investors attending the meeting, urging shareholders to consider the impact of the takeover on staff.

Rob MacGregor, Unite's national secretary with responsibility for finance, said: "We are obviously concerned about redundancies... assurances on jobs have been few and far between."

Questioned in the meeting by Unite's representatives, Mr Stevenson admitted that he had had "no specific guarantees" on jobs and staff terms and conditions, although he added that Lloyds would approach the takeover "carefully and considerately".

Mr Stevenson was also criticised for accepting a lower offer for the business than initially agreed, but he said this was down to the dire situation and weak bargaining position the business found itself in as wholesale markets shut down.

He said: "In the extreme volatility we found ourselves in, we had to negotiate the best deal we could... it is as simple as that."

Commenting on the results of the HBOS takeover vote, Tavish Scott, leader of the Liberal Democrats in Scotland said: "I am disappointed, but not surprised that this deal has been approved.

"This is bad news for jobs and competition in Scotland. Scottish customers and businesses will face higher bank charges in the future as a result.

"The UK Government and the HBOS board were wrong to roll this deal through so smoothly."



Page 1 of 1

 
1

The Leith Cowboy BAM BAM,

Bruxelles 12/12/2008 13:15:40
Theres a shock.

Still , its kept many journalists in a job for a few months writing millions of lines of ultimately useless conjecture.
2

Casey Beer,

12/12/2008 13:16:20
Aaaaarrrrrgggggghhhhh!
3

Save the employees,

12/12/2008 13:32:35
I await with interest the full text of what Hornby and Stevenson actually said. However the reports seem to suggest 'its not our fault'. What an unmitigated lie and downright disgrace that they got off with saying it.
4

Voice of reason,

EDINBURGH 12/12/2008 14:02:13
The fundamental blame lies with Brown and Blair who duped people into feeling good and taking on large credit by lying about the real state of the economy .
We wo'nt forget , and roll on David Cameron as PM !!!
5

The Leith Cowboy BAM BAM,

Bruxelles 12/12/2008 14:14:55
come off it number 4. Whatever happened to personal responsibilty ?

Brown didnt make HBOS give out loans at 8 times salary did he ?

Take some responsiblity for yourself.
6

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 12/12/2008 15:12:04

All apologies accepted, from all who said that I was talking rubbish, when I said 2months ago, the share holders would agree the take over.
Guilt donatios accepted, cheques should be made to,.......

.......,."Linskaill the Prophet".

7

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 12/12/2008 15:23:32

From my on, you must refer to me as,........
..............'OH' WISE ONE!

:)

8

Dragonlord,

12/12/2008 16:16:51
Why was the meeting in Birmingham? Surely the bank HQ was the place to hold this vote.
9

Edward,

12/12/2008 16:27:02
I predict, if Labour loose the next general election, which is liely to happen, Brown and Darling will end up on the board of the much bigger Lloyds Banking Group, no doubt a peerage will be wangled some how
10

Edward,

12/12/2008 16:28:35
#8 Dragonlord
Perhaps the idea was to make it harder for elderly Scottish investors to attend?
11

Jingsitsme,

EDINBURGH 12/12/2008 16:53:09
Let's face it merger can't make bank of scotland/halifax any worse. Their service is the pits and as for their online service LTSB is so slick compared to their outdated version. LTSB transfer/clear funds far quicker, are nicer to deal with and much more helpful.

do beware any other Scottish business if you don't want taken over - work hard and give good customer service as well as good product and that's not what BOS/HALIFAX do. Their own selves to blame....

Best solution it is now to salvage something that should never have been allowed to happen.

Blair, Brown and Darling have a lot to answer for......
12

just-whatever-eh,

DR/F1/MO2 12/12/2008 19:08:12
#11 There are several errors in your perception that LTSB transfer funds quicker than HBOS.

I don't think the HBOS online banking system is any more up to, or any less out of, date than the LTSB online system.

I think you'll find LTSB transfer funds in the same manner as HBOS, as they both use the BACS system.

There are quicker transfers between LTSB to LTSB accounts, but it's the same for HBOS to HBOS.

Neither company uses the faster payments system for online banking.

LTSB will show your cheque in your account the day you pay it in, but the funds aren't cleared. This causes many (thick) customers to believe they have more than their available balance is & they wonder why they receive bank charges.

Having worked in various parts of the processing side for LTSB, I don't think they are the most amazing customer service oriented company. However, I'm sure HBOS employees & various other bank workers of other companies would say the same whatever bank you praise.

As a customer & shareholder (of both & who voted no), while also being an employee of one, I am disappointed in this takeover. It would have been better to see another bidder at least be considered so that the best value deal could have been given to shareholders, customers & staff.

I am however, now just biding my time for a nice (small) redundancy payoff for when the full £1.5billion of rationalisation measures get implemented.

Comment over.
13

Jingsitsme,

EDINBURGH 12/12/2008 20:24:16
#12 - I can appreciate you are writing from a bias viewpoint!!!

I am writing not from my perception but experience with both online banking systems and have the paperwork to prove it!! Im employed by neither and a shareholder in both!

It may well be the same systems but it does depend on when the button is pushed whether funds are held on account overnight before transferring or transferring straight away. LTSB ARE transfer funds from LTSB to another bank the same day whereas HOBOS can take 3 days!

Sorry if you disagree but as you say you ONCE worked, well things change!

As far as Im concerned LTSB are better for private and business banking by a mile!!

If it wasn't that they were merging my accounts in HBOS would be transferred to join those in LTSB.

Perhaps your comments re binding your time is why the service is slow etc in HBOS you just don't care!!

I think that sums you up well and the new joined bank can do without the likes of you.
14

COLINTON.MAINS,

Oakville Ontario 12/12/2008 21:17:48
never.put.all.your.money.in.one.bank.very.stupid
15

photobob,

Ayrshire 13/12/2008 09:14:40
The Greedy shareholders which are mainly big financial companies,three of whom are large Scottish Insurance Institutions should be ashamed of themselves for voting for the demise of Bank of Scotland. It is time for the Scottish public to show a common sense of outrage as to what has been a political move by Gordon Brown, with his part in the banks demise. I for one, as a Bank of Scotland Saver and depositor, will be moving as much as I conveniently can from savings and current accounts to any other High St Branch. The shareholders wrongly assume they own the banks,like Woolworths, their shareholders mean nothing without customers, as would the bank without depositors and savers.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.