Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Monday, 2nd November 2009 Change Date Latest Issue

Worker lived in youth centre 'rarely opened for activities'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 January 2008
A YOUTH worker and his family were allowed to live in a community centre called "The Mansion" while locals complained it was rarely open to the public.
Max Volino, community learning and development worker at Gracemount Youth and Community Centre, has only vacated the historic property recently.

It is understood he was allowed to rent a flat within the sprawling former mansion by the venue's board. But the council raised "considerable concern" about the arrangement as far back as 2005.

A damning new report into the facilities at the centre on Lasswade Road has revealed the number of events provided for youngsters has plummeted in the meantime.

Even though Mr Volino and his family have been living at The Mansion permanently, local residents complained that the centre was rarely open, phone calls were left unanswered, e-mails were ignored and excursions were cancelled at the last minute.

As a result, the council has threatened to withdraw its £8000 grant unless improvements are made.

But the centre's board today hit back, labelling the report "a work of fiction", and claiming the local authority wants to sell the building.

The venue, which opened in 1964, is the first and longest running independent youth centre in Scotland.

It has a range of multi-purpose rooms, including a recording studio and facilities for youth clubs. There is also a walled garden and an all-weather sports pitch.

Councillor Marilyne MacLaren, the city's education leader, said: "The children and families department has a robust quality standards monitoring programme.

"There is considerable concern about the quality of provision offered at Gracemount Community Centre."

When inspectors visited the venue last year, a programme was operating for only two groups of youngsters.

The groups which previously enjoyed sessions five days a week were unable to access the building.

During the two-week inspection period, only 23 young people attended events, and almost half of these were cancelled due to lack of organised staff cover.

Inspectors said: "Often, (the centre] was closed and there seemed to be no pattern or operational hours that could be identified."

The council has drawn up an action plan, which calls for a review of staffing arrangements, and for the centre to engage more with other community facilities.

The report added Mr Volino's living arrangements caused "considerable concern" over access to the building.

It said: "The only access to this accommodation was through the main building. This leaves both the worker, his family and centre users at potential risk."

When contacted by the Evening News, Mr Volino said: "It's obviously a very stressful time for me and my family."

The board also hit back at the inspectors' findings. It called the report "a work of fiction that bears no resemblance to the work that goes on in The Mansion".

A pamphlet available at The Mansion also claims the council is seeking to terminate the board's lease to save money.

A council spokeswoman insisted there were no proposals to close the centre. Liberton/Gilmerton councillor Ian Murray said he hoped the problems "are resolved as quickly as possible".

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 15 January 2008 10:56 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

The Judge,

15/01/2008 12:17:38
Is this the same Max Volino that stood as an independent candidate at the recent council elections?

I live quite near this place and up until today I had no idea it was a "community centre". More waste by the city council by the looks of it. You can bet he wasn't paying anything like market rent for his mansion.
2

alex paterson,

embra 15/01/2008 12:30:17
No doubt this guy did not pay much rent,was he more like a caretaker,or a deterrent to the local Neds breaking in.
3

Jingsitsme,

EDINBURGH 15/01/2008 12:35:55
Well you learn something every day even if you stay within a mile of the place.

I'm a business person and I have never seen any adverts of any function, event being held in that place.

Time all the community funding was pulled in under one umbrella and a proper committee allocated to distribute it and be measurable evaluated for their results.

what a waste of money! I'd love to know the rent this max has paid! Another job for the boys!

It stinks!
4

Jingsitsme,

EDINBURGH 15/01/2008 12:43:46
#4 No I disagree this is an unsuitable venue for a youth club.

If board are really interested in the young people they would not even be considering it.

time the lease was stopped and the council got ot grips with all this waste of money in communities.



5

Paul Voltaire,

15/01/2008 12:53:57
It is a completely unsuitable place for leisure activities. and is within shooting distance of The Marmion.
6

brettgallacher,

edinburgh 15/01/2008 13:23:29
the mansion and inch community centre were thriving centres which lots of kids used years ago until the council ant hill mob got involved then costs who could get in etc ruined it and we wonder why kids roam the streets
7

,

15/01/2008 13:40:42
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

Liberton Star,

Edinburgh 15/01/2008 14:10:58
What is taking place here is an outrage. For the Board to describe a council report as a work of fiction without any detailed response shows that the report is right. Having lived in the area all of my life I know that the centre used to be well used. Mr Boag was an excellent worker, and he had activities going on there all the time. It has never been the same since he left.

This is a rediculous state of affairs when there is a Liesure Centre not 50 yards from the 'Mansion'. Why not close the centre and use the money to put on proper activities in the youth cafe at the liesure centre.

I have no axe to grind with Mr Volino, but he clearly has a lot of explaining to do. The Board at the centre do neither him, nor more importantly the local community any favours by burying their heads in the sand. Who are these people?

There are schools nearby that are doing a proper job, and yet it is they and not this centre that have been put forward for closure. Surely not right.
9

11,

Tranent 15/01/2008 14:47:34
I used to live a stones throw away from this place and passed it every day, I never once saw any evidence of youth club activities.
10

,

15/01/2008 14:47:35
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
11

Chris,

Edinburgh 15/01/2008 15:12:15
Is this the same Volino whose other youth organisation was run into the ground through lack of activity and leadership?
12

,

15/01/2008 15:34:42
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

,

15/01/2008 15:54:59
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
14

rock on jonny,

15/01/2008 15:55:59
SORRY NO 4 AIMED AT NO 6
15

Robert Young,

15/01/2008 16:44:21
Could not have happened to a nicer chap, Volino is a destructive no good piece crap you would expect to find on the sole of your shoe. As for the board, white sticks would not go amiss; they cannot see the wood for the trees as Volino has pulled the wool over their eyes.
16

Zorro's brother,

15/01/2008 16:46:22
#18 Obviously your aim is not that good, how appropriate considering the subject #6 was referring to.
17

Reinhold,

Edinburgh 15/01/2008 17:33:24
'Is this the same Max Volino that stood as an independent candidate at the recent council elections?'

It is. His election leaflet promised things he was supposed to be delivering anyway. Check the rundown in activities for the elderly, which began shortly after he got the job. And what happened to the beds the exchange trips used when the place was run properly by the previous administrator?

For the board to describe the Council report as a 'work of fiction' is ludicrous. If anything, it was pulling its punches.
18

Jingsitsme,

EDINBURGH 15/01/2008 18:42:14
#7 A Allan - i am thinking of the children. I stand by what I said in 3. and no I am not a property developer!

Inch House and the Mansion are the past - they are not buildings for young people groups. You say only £8000 grant received - well that is still a lot of money.

Cutbacks have to be made by everybody and like everyone else money spent has to be accountable and results measurable. Some of you on these boards have no business skills. These days are gone.

There are other purpose built buildings in the area and surrounding parts that could be utilised. Time for change!!! ......suggest you embrace it.
19

mickey D,

Gracemount 15/01/2008 20:27:26
For once the council is doing it's job by highlighting bad practice. A pat on the back for them and time the worker put his hands up to the board (New and inexperienced I'm guessing!) The worker not so! Were they in the building and witnessed anything other than what was highlighted in the report?
There have been other reports on community centres in the area all in the public domain and all very positive - The problem is the worker not the council!
This area deserves better for our young people and a board and worker committed to putting their energy into improvements not pointing the finger at others! Get on with cleaning up this mess and providing a programme for the community !
20

Michelle & Tracy,

Edinburgh 15/01/2008 20:38:16
Our children have used the mansion over the past 2 years and have really enjoyed the trips and activities . They've been to some really interesting places and in general we've had to be quick to get a place as ,as with many other clubs there has to be a limit to the number of places available to stay within the adult/carer: child ratio.
when was this 2 week inspection period carried out when apparently only 23 children attended ? On a few occassions there has been 2 mini buses of children attending and when numbers have exceeded this public transport has had to be used. We agree that there has not been alot of activities within the mansion for the past year but this boils down to the condition of the building and health and safety issues for the children.so given the circumstances we feel that Max has offered suitable alternatives . We were originally made aware of the youth club from a leaflet brought home from school and are now kept up to date by post .
As #4 stated there has been a youth worker staying on the premises since 1964 so why is this now an issue? This whole senario sounds like a witch hunt against Max. Do the council think a new Youth Worker would do ,given the circumstances, a better job than Max? We don't think so , the council want the building back and are prepared to do anything to get it !!!
21

Richard Head,

15/01/2008 23:07:41
#24
I don't believe you
22

Finbarr Saunders,

15/01/2008 23:47:21
Max Volino should just shut up and thank his lucky stars that he's only getting turfed out of The Mansion.

He has pulled the wool over the eyes of the incompetents in the Council for ages.
23

COLINTON.MAINS,

Oakville Ontario 15/01/2008 23:48:08
A.NOTHER.DEMO.JOB.FOR.COUNCIL/BULLDOZERS.READY
24

tattie bogle,

home 16/01/2008 09:22:03
max volino. bet he is moray house trained
25

The Hearts and Soul of Edinburgh aka Hearts,

Gracemount 16/01/2008 10:01:59
The only thing Max is trying to do is help the Community , and its the council that are trying to do everything they can to prevent him from doing his job. The ammount of over time that Max does is admirable. The Mansion was only a few hours from shutting down in December. And I think that you have to give the new board credit for keeping it open. And as usual its the paper who are not giving the ful story. The only reason it was not open was it was not safe for teh childrean to go in and it was the council who were taking there time in trying to fix it.
26

happyhibees,

Edinburgh 16/01/2008 11:12:19
You are a very confused and mixed up person. Nothing that Volino does is admirable.

This is not the first adverse report that has been done on the centre. The last one was similar and was compounded by the fact that the centre had no Child Protection Policy.

He is a paid officer of the Council so the centre is not only receiving £8000, it must be nearer £40,000 in total. He has been on secondment to the centre for years because he is a trouble maker and the Council don’t want him back. Why is he still employed? I will give the new Board credit when they sack him.
27

The Hearts and Soul of Edinburgh aka Hearts,

16/01/2008 11:24:45
#32 I think you should come back when you actually know what you are talking about. Max could have easily got a job any where beacause he is a top worker, but he has decided to stay at the Mansion because he is one of the few council workers that really does care about the community. Plus the report does not tell all the story. Only bits that will make Max and the mansion look bad. How can you say sack teh Board. They have only been there for about three -four months. It was the preivous Board that were the joke, that why they did not get elected again.
28

happyhibees,

16/01/2008 11:44:44
#33 I did not suggest that the new Board should be sacked. If this is the level of your interpretation skills I have concerns re the new boards ability the interpate Volino's true value to the Centre and indeed the community.
29

The Hearts and Soul of Edinburgh aka Hearts,

16/01/2008 11:53:24
Does it not say volumes last the Mansion has only ever had two youth workers in there history, I think the like of Gilmerton etc etc have had that in the last five years. If Max left, the whole centre would not last. Simple
30

beinn the hoose,

16/01/2008 13:03:02
#32 Spot on there. Volino of the Mansion and Travers of the Inch both.
31

Spock,

/ 16/01/2008 13:46:32
Oh shame on you Ms McLaren. Lost your memory? I suggest you try to find it again and pretty quick.

It is very sad that the Council are only happy to read a report that they themselves have commissioned.

As Ms McLaren well knows, as far back as 1997 the Labour Council were withdrawing money from Gracemount Communtiy Centre and when the local Social Inclusion Partnership arrived things got no better. Gracemount was always side stepped when it came to funding. The Labour administration wanted to sell off that land when they built new houses in Gracemount Drive.

Why do the Lib Dems enjoy sticking the knife in so much? Ms McLaren is supposed to be supportive of youth diversionary schemes, youth clubs etc. Nice way to show your support lady. And as for Mr Volino staying there, he has much reduced the amount of vandalism. Ms McLaren has enough contacts within Lothian and Borders Police to get the statistics.

Shame on you.
32

The Hearts and Soul of Edinburgh aka Hearts,

Gracfemount 16/01/2008 14:23:30
#38 & #37 Agree with both of u. Im suprised that the mansion has not broken in to yet, as there is noboday occuping the building. Maybe, just maybe. That what the council wants.
33

The faithful=,

Edinburgh 17/01/2008 13:54:14
I though that max volino worked at the mansion as a volunteer for 2 yrs before he was officially put in charge,didn't know he had another youth club he ran into the ground .PLEASE Chris #11# do tell us more so we can sort fact from fiction by doing our own homework.
34

The faithful=,

17/01/2008 14:21:45
E.E.N.Why at top of page do you have 40 comments but we can only see 33,have these ones been removed because they support the mansion clubs.?
35

happyhibees,

17/01/2008 22:11:11
I thing the youth organisation referred to was the Edinburgh And Lothians Clubs For Young People
36

Robert Young,

17/01/2008 22:17:09
#35#33#11#Definatly was the Edinburgh And Lothians Clubs For Young People
37

,

18/01/2008 22:55:53
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
38

The faithful=,

19/01/2008 13:06:11
If the council would just get the work on the building finished ,and stop dragging it out the clubs could get back to normal.But you don't need to be a rocket scientist to know you cant have kids in a building thats not being made safe.
39

The faithful=,

Edinburgh 31/01/2008 14:02:23
Mr Volino was only a volunteer at the Edinburgh and Lothian club for young people,not on staff or paid.
40

Terr2,

07/02/2008 01:47:58
The council need to sack those troublemaking freeloaders Volino and Travers first(as reported in the EEN so it must be true), then get rid of the rest of the lazy community agitators who draw massive salaries and live in massive hooses.
Workers in the true sense they certainly are not, as I saw the so called worker from duncan place community centre getting on the bus at 3 oclock the other day, nice to get an early finish eh???
Spend the money where its needed not on the waste of space that is community learning and development -whatever that is.
Most of these community types are part time property developers, ploughing their vast salaries into the overcooked Edinburgh property market. They have plenty of time on their hands for jooking about the city supposedly attending meetings, whlst they are actually checking up on their tenants, viewing property, having long lunches, or playing golf.

Andrew Burns (who talks to himself on his blog - him and his luvved up alter ego), of course knows all of this, but is taking advantage to bluster as only he can.
Maybe he should waken up to the fact that his Councils staff in this case are shafting Edinburgh.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.