Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Monday, 2nd November 2009 Change Date Latest Issue

One o'Clock Gun cash probe was just 'a storm in a teacup'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 11 August 2008
THE One o'Clock Gun Association has called an inquiry into its finances "a storm in a teacup" after the Big Lottery Fund said they had done nothing wrong.
The investigation was launched after bank staff raised concerns about their accounts. It was alleged there some "financial irregularities" surrounding an £8000 lottery grant for their website under the Awards for All scheme.

The lottery fund said there is no evidence of irregularities though, and they hope to conclude the inquiry as quickly as possible.

The cash was given to the group to set up a website which was launched at Christmas.

The association was founded in 1998 to promote the story of the historic gun at Edinburgh Castle. It established a permanent exhibition, and regularly holds talks and discussions about the city's history and promotes tourism.

Derek Watters, treasurer of the association, said he believed one of the members had wanted to "blacken his name". The association were due to meet yesterday following a meeting with lottery officials on Friday.

Mr Watters said: "The police were never involved in this. The lottery fund are going to clear us and we just want to carry on with our work.

"The accounts were totally clear – there was really nothing in the allegations. I think this has been quite malicious."

The allegations arose after bank staff noticed that the association had taken out three accounts in its name. Staff at TSB in Hanover Street contacted members and advised them to call the police.

Mr Watters said: "One of these was for the grant money and another was a savings account. It made sense to keep the money separate."

They have now spent £6200 on their website, to bring their story to a wider audience.

The association has now returned the remaining £1800 to the Big Lottery Fund. They sent the receipts, accounts and invoices to them in June.

Mr Watters said there was also no truth in rumours that the association had formed a new committee following a vote of no confidence in the existing one.

"That would be against our constitution," he said. "The committee is the same as before."

George Robinson, an honorary member of the association, said none of the members had been accused of any wrongdoing.

He said: "There is nothing going on. I knew all along it was just a storm in a teacup. Our members just want to safeguard public money."

A spokeswoman for the Awards for All scheme said: "We hope to conclude the investigation as soon as possible."


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 August 2008 3:59 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Jock MacSprog,

11/08/2008 12:42:23
So much for the reputations of those involved with this organisation, eh ? Perhaps the media should do a bit of homework and research before just writing anything.
2

capy,

embra 11/08/2008 13:13:08
If they find any wrongdoing, somebody should be fired.
3

alex paterson,

edinburgh 11/08/2008 13:32:29
This would never have happened if Tam the Gun was still with us.
4

gorgeousgorgieboy,

Edinburgh 11/08/2008 16:14:41
This was just a storm in a teacup.

(From which cooncil staff had nicked the teaspoons.)
5

alex paterson,

edinburgh 11/08/2008 16:48:38
#4

Like it.
6

The Geniune Mario Antionette,

11/08/2008 18:21:07
Well it makes a change for bank staff to be alert to fraudulent activities. By contrast, the HBoS at Liberton were alerted to the fact that the Alnwickhill Proprietors Association bank account was being accessed & managed by unauthorised signatories (ie SNP Councillor Tom Buchanan) but they did absolutely nothing.
7

Incandescent,

11/08/2008 18:21:45
£6200 for their site? In terms of value for money that alone is criminal!
8

Tommy Cooper,

Edinburgh 10/10/2008 11:43:50
7: Get some facts before you post your comments.

Months of research, over 500 emails of images, yes 500 emails.

120 pages plus, hours of scanning plus meetings.

Not criminal by any means. The lottery fund did not question these costs.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.