Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Tuesday, 24th November 2009 Change Date

Hot properties set to net city £20m in office sell-off plan

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
25 April 2007
A MASSIVE sell-off of council property across the Capital is being considered in a move that would raise up to £20 million for the city.
Offices in Cockburn Street, the High Street, King's Stables Road and McDonald Road have all been identified as potentially surplus to requirements.

Developers are expected to be keen to snap up the properties which could be turned into flats, shops, bars or restaurants.

City leaders are expected to order a review tomorrow of the council's property holdings with a view to raising money.

Chesser House, a major office block the council leases on Gorgie Road, may also be vacated as part of the shake-up.

The move follows the sale of £45m worth of property by the council to help fund the building of its new headquarters beside Waverley Station.

It is thought selling the offices - and leasing alternative ones - may be cheaper for the council than renovating them to modern standards.

Councillor Brian Fallon, the city's property services leader, said: "We obviously want our staff to be housed in modern office accommodation and also want to secure the best deal for the council. We are not talking about building another headquarters, but we are carrying out a review of all our assets across the city. However, it is in the very early stages."

The city's development director, Andrew Holmes, has recommended the property review as a way of potentially raising money and ensuring "best value" for council taxpayers.

Some of the money raised by any new sell-offs would be used to help rent modern and environmentally-friendly office space in the city centre.

The massive Waverley Gate building - the former General Post Office, which has been lying empty since a major refurbishment more than two years ago - is seen as a prime contender.

Other options are thought to include the former Standard Life offices in Canonmills and those set to be built near the new council HQ as part of the planned Caltongate development.

The review comes just months after 1800 council staff moved into the local authority's new base. The move is said to have provoked complaints from some staff left behind in out-of-date offices.

Roy Durie, director of Edinburgh-based property agents Ryden, said: "There is no doubt the council could raise significant sums of money by putting more of its assets on the open market. With each site you could be talking about generated anything between £3m and £5m."

John Stevenson, chair of the council branch of public sector union Unison, said: "Some of the conditions that staff who have moved in to Waverley Court were in previously were horrendous, but for others there hasn't been that much of a difference.

"People did prefer working in smaller offices and we have had a lot of complaints about the conditions at Waverley Court. We would not want to see people crammed into modern office accommodation or any extension of the hot-desking that goes on at Waverley Court at the moment."

The latest offices which could be sold currently house staff from the council's communities department, children and families department, and licensing officials.

A city source said: "The council has seen the kind of income that can be generated with the way the property market is at the moment and it's obviously very costly to try to refurbish old office buildings.

"If a good solution can be found in the city centre that is not too expensive then there is no doubt it will be seriously considered in the next couple of years."

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 April 2007 12:22 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Commercial property
 
1

Banditry,

25/04/2007 11:02:29

'in a move that would raise up to £20 million for the city.'

How would the money be used to help the city?

2

Bien E. Bien,

25/04/2007 11:06:19

Surely this is shifing appreciating assets off the balance sheet, in a way that will benefit the private sector over the public sector?

I am sure that the "developers" will be keen. Ker-ching!! (or whatever mock cash register sound is appropriate)

3

Randan,

25/04/2007 11:11:05

They can use this money to renovate Meadowbank

4

,

25/04/2007 11:18:28
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 560255, Article id was mapped to record!
5

S Hamilton,

Embra 25/04/2007 11:32:11

I take it when the say 20 million for the city, they mean 20 million for the cooncil, a completely different thing.

6

YTS,

Meadowbank 25/04/2007 11:33:50

Is "Jambo Gaz" a contender for Report as unsuitable??

i mean his name says it all really doesn't it?

7

Randan,

25/04/2007 11:34:16

So eloquent Gaz, what a convincing argument you put across too.
Did you pass any exams at school, or are you not old enough to sit them yet?

8

,

25/04/2007 11:36:43
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 560384, Article id was mapped to record!
9

YTS,

Meadowbank 25/04/2007 11:48:33

#8
Comeback Jambo Gaz all is forgiven

10

Randan,

25/04/2007 11:53:18

YTS #9
He does have a point, but if he was truly neutral he'd add Tynecastle to the list. That's misery for thousands every week just now too.

11

Mallory,

25/04/2007 11:59:05

Something needs to prop up the pensions fund... meanwhile take a look at http://www.edinburghatrisk.org/

12

coinsorter,

edinburgh 25/04/2007 12:18:27

the council would have had a lot more property to sell if their new hq at market st had been able too house all its staff like it was meant too do needless to say no one was held too account for this shambles off the building not being suitable for the job

13

alex paterson,

embra 25/04/2007 12:22:33

More council bonuses,And brown envelopes,It sure wont help us in anyway,No reductions in anything.

14

Steve99,

Snap up what first??? 25/04/2007 13:03:20

"Developers are expected to be keen to snap up the properties which could be turned into flats, shops, bars or restaurants."

Snap up a councillor first, will make it all much easier.

15

Jakey Rowling,

25/04/2007 13:09:59

Seeing as the council already owns the properties, why not convert them to flats and try renting it out to ease the accommodation crisis.

Or it could just take the money and run I suppose.

16

Scotty1,

25/04/2007 13:42:56

The council cant sell Chesser House as they dont even own it

17

Turquoise Naked Hexagon Sun,

25/04/2007 13:49:09

"Developers are expected to be keen to snap up the properties which could be turned into flats, shops, bars or restaurants."

What fabulous in-depth reporting.

Let's hope they are all converted in great big pubs.

Okay, sarcasm over.

The most likely solution (in about 10 years time) will see most of these hideous venues erased and cheap shoddy luxury flats in their place.

18

Broughton Resident,

25/04/2007 13:58:49

The story did say that the Cooncil leases Chesser, but it's a horrible place to work, and in the middle of nowhere too.

If the Cooncil's Housing Department had disappeared when it was supposed to with the proposed change to the rented housing business, then there would have been much more space for staff in Waverleygate.

Also, it wasn't a case of someone designing the building too small, because, as is usual, there are all sorts of regulations to comply with that limited the size of the building too - and it's not a shambles of a building. If you worked in some of the places staff had to work in before you'd think it was a palace.

19

Mallory,

25/04/2007 15:05:35

Do the council actually 'own' anything? Surely these are public assets held in trust and managed for the common good of the city's residents and ratepayers.

20

,

25/04/2007 15:38:18
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason: Scotsman Import, Original comment id: 561511, Article id was mapped to record!
21

dyb,

25/04/2007 16:52:22

How can the council be making decisions on such matters within a week of an election?

22

Grumpy,

25/04/2007 17:48:22

Well, I suppose that'll be £20million less that the trams will end up costing us then...............

23

The Judge,

25/04/2007 18:22:31

Good point ~19.

Maybe the 'common good' is when they can make savings by selling off the buildings we own so they can keep the council tax down?

The developed buidlings that are turned into shops, bars and restaurants which might encourage more vistors to the city who spend money in bars, shops and restaurants that employ local residents who pay council tax.

I wouldn't worry to much about the size of Waverley Gate, it'll be big enough when the cost cutting exersise starts not long after the election. You can't fund a 0% neutral rise in CT for very long and the next election is a mear 4 years away.

24

One-man-bucket's older twin,

25/04/2007 23:20:47

Spot on, Mallory.

'It is thought selling the offices - and leasing alternative ones - may be cheaper for the council than renovating them to modern standards.' I seem to remember Chesser House being renovated about three years ago. Is this another example of the council not forcing contractors to work to standard (unlike the regulations it imposes on private individuals/organisations wishing to renovate/improve/expand their existing properties).

Cross-reference story, 'Paving the way for better repairs'.

25

JWW,

Whitburn, West Lothian. 25/04/2007 23:31:52

Could it be that the council are only interested in moving to new buildings because they want to help their developer friends to solve failed white elephant projects, such as Waverley Gate, at the taxpayer's expense?

26

Miss Jean Brodie,

25/04/2007 23:51:23

that money - will be our money! and I feel it should be counted and returned to th etaxpayer - a small deposit in each and everyones bank account will be suuficient thank you !

The money does not belong to the CITY but the PEOPLE - of course the Labour party no nothing nor care about the people as we all know - all they care about is how bad the SNP will be for everyone !

27

plord,

edinburgh 26/04/2007 00:24:49

#18
you said
If the Cooncil's Housing Department had disappeared when it was supposed to with the proposed change to the rented housing business, then there would have been much more space for staff in Waverleygate.

your quite right to point out that the council expected/demanded we turn over our housing stock to an unaccountable quango in return for a debt of 2 billion pounds, which the council would spend.
when we had the temerity to say no, even after the pro lobby(paid senior council officials) knocking on our doors more than once and the council funded battle bus backed by ads in this paper, it seems there was no plan B to deal with the housing problems.
it now turns out the council had already made the decision before asking us to rubber stamp it, and now faces overcrowding at the hq and can't afford the rent for chesser house but still needs to put the staff somewhere.
boot out the politicians on the 3rd and remind the new lot that we will be asking questions and "it was the last lots fault" won't wash

28

eric,

26/04/2007 06:13:00

Glasgow did this on a larger scale


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.