Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Monday, 2nd November 2009 Change Date Latest Issue

Caltongate: 'The loss of a potential 2000 jobs is a blow'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 March 2009
THE collapse of the Caltongate development in the heart of the Old Town should send alarm bells ringing through the Capital.
There will be those who celebrate its demise as the vanquishing of a threat to our built heritage in general and the unique setting of the Royal Mile in particular.

The controversy over whether the £300 million regeneration could have been more se
nsitively designed will continue.

However, the loss of potentially more than 2000 jobs that the project promised to create is an undoubted blow in such tough economic times.

There is perhaps an air of inevitability about another major development grinding to a halt as the recession bites.

Yet serious thought needs to be given to the complaint from the developer, Mountgrange, that the project was fatally wounded by unreasonable delays in the planning system.

It is astonishing to think that the planning process took four years to complete.

It is, of course, vital that there are stringent checks on new buildings proposed for the city's World Heritage Site, but that must surely be possible in a fraction of that time.

Such marathon sessions are in no-one's best interests – not those of the developers looking to invest in the Capital, not those of the cash-strapped council and not those of the communities living with uncertainty hanging over their heads.

A full year before Caltongate project was given the go-ahead, the Edinburgh Chamber of Commerce sounded a warning about the signals which the delays were sending out to other developers. It said such "red tape" was scaring off developers who were choosing instead to invest in Glasgow, where a streamlined planing system meant verdicts on major projects were typically reached in six to eight weeks.

Dealing with the level of objections that controversial plans often raise in Edinburgh mean this kind of lightning pace will not be possible.

But the city council should look at the achievements in Glasgow – where council leader Steven Purcell's open door policy is said to be a key part of the process – to see what lessons can be learned.

When the economy begins to recover, it will be more important than ever for the city to be at the top of its game when it comes to attracting new investment. If Edinburgh cannot show that it is open for business, then there are plenty of other cities which will.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 March 2009 9:35 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Caltongate development
 
1

Buttress,

25/03/2009 11:55:52
Thi is, of course, all the PR put about by Mark Cummings, spin doctor for Mountgrange. The fact it took four years is the fault surely of Mountgrange? You can blame no-one else. The plans were passed a year ago, they still haven't bought all the land and buildings required from the council yet... surely thay can't expect a development of this size can be designed and consulted on in a rush?

Smoke and mirrors, this story, and this psper will go along with anything?

Chamber of Commerce? Don't make us laugh! Backed pals at Mountgrange all the way - no-one takes them seriously, surely? And Mountgrange holds its property portfolio.



2

Buttress,

25/03/2009 12:02:18
"It is, of course, vital that there are stringent checks on new buildings proposed for the city's World Heritage Site, but that must surely be possible in a fraction of that time."

If only that had been the case - shame it wasn't. There were no 'stringent checks' as all those who objected on the grounds the development is crud were brutally ignored - hence the UNESCO visit.

Look forward to reading its report.I gather it's 'damning'.




3

Mallory,

Edinburgh 25/03/2009 12:18:49
If the council thinks that 2000 jobs would have been created they are living in cloud cuckoo land. Several hundred during building work and couple of hundred part time minimum wage jobs in the boozers, hotel and shops.

4

nSyratzcGlaw,

25/03/2009 12:22:49
3 well thats about 1000 less than we have now.
5

Buttress,

25/03/2009 12:23:11
Oh, no-one ever checks these claims by developers, all bunkum, as with the 'millions' 'invested'. The amount goes up all the time, and those claims go unchecked too.

Also, it's not exactly philanthropy, is it? They are doing it to make pots of dosh, not because they give a damn about people or the city.
6

Guthrie,

Edinburgh 25/03/2009 12:24:51
Hang on, who wrote this? Did a computer copy an e-mail press release from Mountgrange? Was there any human involvement at all?
7

Buttress,

25/03/2009 12:27:34
Of course not! You know this paper has supported this development to the hilt, and will continue to blindly do so.

It's all funny handshakes and old pals. (No idea about buff containers...)
8

Rap,

25/03/2009 13:06:16
"But the city council should look at the achievements in Glasgow – where council leader Steven Purcell's open door policy is said to be a key part of the process – to see what lessons can be learned."

And they'll be applying for WHS anyday now then?

When did this supposed 4 years actually start. Is that from consultation or from the planning application submission?
9

Buttress,

25/03/2009 13:13:11
Probably from the day they saw the ad for the site being up for sale.

Look, don't blind Marky 'I ate all the pies' Cummings of Invicta PA with facts, it's his job to ensure Mountgrange come out of this smelling of roses. And this paper will simply blindy repeat it all.

This is a massive and complex development; surely it should have taken time to get it right?

Shame they didn't, of course.



10

Buttress,

25/03/2009 13:22:10
I posted this elsewhere but it's relevant here:

Treat all this with the largest pinch of salt... the results are carefully manipulated twaddle... but if all this was in place by Jan 2006, why the delays?

http://www.caltongate.com/CaltonGate-a-step-closer-after-public-show-their-support.aspx

Naturally, Allan Murray did his usual back of the fag packet sketch of a masterplan in the pub one evening,in Jan 2006, his mates who did the 'architecture' took a day or two to design it all, then the plans were whopped in and left on a shelf in the CEC planning offices for years, with nothing happening...


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Should the Old Town’s Caltongate development be revived in its original form?
Yes, it was an innovative and stylish proposal
No, it was not in fitting with the Old Town
Yes, but it needs to be done more cheaply

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.