Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Wednesday, 9th December 2009 Change Date

Reject chiefs' 'excessive' pay, RBS investors told

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 18 April 2007
INVESTORS are being urged to vote against pay awards to executives at the Royal Bank of Scotland when they gather at the Edinburgh-based bank's annual shareholder meeting next Wednesday.
Driving the rejection call is the Pensions Investment Research Consultancy (Pirc), which claims that awards to all RBS executives are "excessive" and that bonus targets are not challenging enough.

The consultancy also wants the group's top Americ
an director dumped.

Pirc, whose clients are mainly pension funds and fund managers and hold about £750 billion in assets, is particularly aggrieved about the remuneration of Larry Fish who heads RBS America and was paid £6.6 million in salary, bonus and benefits last year.

Group chief executive Sir Fred Goodwin is also in line for an additional bonus of around £3.5m from RBS' long-term incentive scheme, on top of his salary and standard bonus.

Also voicing concern is the Association of British Insurers. It is concerned at the amount of discretion given to RBS's remuneration committee. It has put an "amber top" on RBS, potentially signalling corporate governance breaches, and said it was seeking more information from the bank before next week's meeting.

According to Pirc: "Mr Fish has a one-year rolling contract and termination bonus (up to 400 per cent of salary) as well as health, life insurance and long-term disability coverage and any benefits at the time of termination."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 18 April 2007 10:07 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Royal Bank of Scotland
 
1

Lord Bean-Counter of Gogar,

Brigadoon 18/04/2007 22:41:52

Good to see PIRC challenging an organisation that has little regard for the population on which it depends for its obscene profits.

It is well within the abilities of executives or, indeed a single executive, to exert "influence" on a remuneration committee.

I'm sure the matter will be brushed under the carpet, sorry resolved, by the gentle application of copious amounts of corporate hostility to gullible hacks.

2

Mike Giggler,

18/04/2007 23:32:16

Judging by the lack of comments on this thread, I can only assume that most regular board correspondents here pick up monthly paychecks signed off by Freddy!

3

Jock MacSprog,

18/04/2007 23:37:23

#2 Yes, isnt that terrible that a company is actually creating jobs in Scotland. Guess you think we should all be employed by the Government.

4

Fernando Poo,

19/04/2007 00:01:30

#3

Examine your payslip.

We are all working for the Government.

Only a complete t0sser would support the social injustice that is driven by the NuLabour administration.

5

Mike Giggler,

19/04/2007 00:10:13

Sir Bert Badloss could eat anyone at Follyrood for breakfast.

Although I suspect he would draw the line at swallowing Bendy Alexander or Nicola Surgeon's ejaculations.

(Moderator: Look it up before deleting the post)


 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.