Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Tuesday, 8th December 2009 Change Date

Brian Monteith: Bercow is MPs' chance to change

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 June 2009
THE new Speaker of the House of Commons, John Simon Bercow, had better have eyes in the back of his head if he is to look after himself, for the knives are already out to remove him from his post – by his former colleagues on the Conservative benches.
It would seem the expenses scandals of the last month that led directly to the demise of the last Speaker have not been enough to waken up a great many members of parliament to just how out of touch they are.

And they are not alone – much of the
reporting of Bercow's elevation from the Westminster media village has positively revelled in the prospect that yet another Speaker might be unceremoniously shown the door.

I've known Bercow for nearly thirty years and for all we might occasionally disagree I would certainly have supported him if I had the good fortune to have had a vote. Only Anne Widdicombe offered the same degree of uncomfortable independence that comes from being a member of the awkward squad – and in the role of Speaker the last thing the Parliament needs is a slave to the party whips.

When I was running the Tory students from Conservative Central Office in London I came across John when I visited Essex University to speak to first year students. The meeting had been unhelpfully cancelled by the student union so John and I went for a few beers instead and I immediately identified him as a politician with a bright future.

The son of a North London Jewish taxi driver, he was not the stereotype Tory material but loved the oratory of Winston Churchill and Enoch Powell, had a keen logical mind, and as a fresher was a better speaker than most older student hacks, including me.

Elected to Westminster in 1997 Bercow soon shone, and as a result made enemies, in particular for abandoning his previously right-wing views, becoming what is called a "moderniser". The truth is that Bercow has a libertarian streak and in most respects has been consistent. It was no surprise when he resigned as a shadow cabinet member following Iain Duncan's ill-advised three line whip against allowing unmarried couples to adopt children. He argued it was a matter of individual conscience and not party policy – again showing his independent streak.

It is this willingness to speak out, to defend the unpopular, even though it might affect his career that should give us hope that he will be a good Speaker. If the next government is likely to be a Tory one, and I think it is reasonable to say that it is, then a Speaker that is not in the pocket of the new government – and certainly one that is not part of David Cameron's network of Etonians – is a must.

The idea that one of the first things that Cameron would do as Prime Minister is condone the replacement of the Speaker with someone more amenable is surely risible. Bercow now has the chance to show us Westminster can change for the better. If members want to demonstrate they are serious about living in the real world they should cut Bercow some slack – or allow the cancer of cynicism to spread further through British politics.

See past smokescreen
A CAMPAIGN to amend the smoking ban in England and Wales was launched this week, calling for specially licensed premises with demonstrably high standards of air quality being able to offer smokers the chance to go indoors. I wish it well but the odds are against such tolerance, however.

Last week the BBC kicked off a call for smoking to be banned in cars when there's children present. What might seem a reasonable idea is actually nothing of the sort. The aim of such a ban would be to introduce the precedent so that a similar ban would be applied to anyone's private home. In time the ban would spread to all cars and all homes. Taking hard drugs would become easier.

If you think I'm being reactionary or extreme then consider that the smoking bans were first introduced on long-haul flights and in some railway carriages – with the promise they wouldn't be extended. Soon after all flights and then all trains banned smoking, and now it extends to all "public" enclosed places.

The threat to children is a smokescreen. Introducing laws is no substitute to improving people's manners when with those who don't smoke, including children.

Cut tax, aid recovery
FRESH economic information came out this last week that should be of great concern to Scottish politicians – especially those who inhabit Holyrood.

First, official figures showed that since devolution the number of people working in the public sector had increased by 50,000 – including some 3,400 in the last year when the private sector has been looking to economise. Then on Tuesday, a study by the Fraser of Allander Institute said that compared to the rest of the UK Scotland will have a very weak recovery – and that it will require greater inward investment (foreigners' private money) if it is to have healthy economic growth.

Maybe if everybody, including our business sector, paid less taxes we might recover quicker without overseas help?





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 26 June 2009 8:24 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Brian Monteith
 
1

sheenadon,

darlington 26/06/2009 14:15:54
Funny how this campaign initiated by three MP,s of different political party,s and a television celebrity has received so little publicity. Most people dont know anything about it. A campaign to help save our pubs and clubs for future generations. I wish them well with this. Just concerned about what appears to be a conspiracy of silence or is it political correctness in it,s most extreme form.
2

english charlie,

26/06/2009 14:56:19
The main reasons for introducing the smoking ban were to protect staff from second hand smoke and reduce the number of children taking up smoking.
If there are no staff, then there is no problem. If there there are staff, then I'm sure that they would prefer a little bit of smoke than being unemployed. A good ventilation system would stop any second hand smoke anyway.
Children now see more smoking than ever before, because people are smoking outside pubs and clubs in full view of children.
3

BeeGee,

26/06/2009 19:05:06
I have to disagree with Brian on this topic. The initiative is claimed to cover the whole of the UK. Today the Dutch Bar and Cafe Owners lodged their next phase of their legal case against their Government.. a multi million euro damages claim for lost earnings since their ban has been amended and smoking is now back on the menu.
4

mandyv,

banitland 27/06/2009 01:25:31
Well I have to say I trust you on this Mr. Monteith, some of know what is going on in intolerant California that has spread across the globe.

BeeGee- Glad to hear that, that is what should happen hear, people get stupid amounts of compensation for feelings being hurt. Being forced to go bankrupt for something that was not wanted but imposed anyway, (for those that did not want this ban) they should be given some kind of compensation.
freedom2choose.info for smokers and non-smokers alike, fighting for choice and TRUTH

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.