Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Wednesday, 4th November 2009 Change Date Latest Issue

Top Tory David Davis to resign as MP

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 12 June 2008
TOP Tory frontbencher David Davis shocked Westminster today by announcing that he was resigning as an MP to "take a stand" against the Government's 42-day terror detention plan.
The shadow home secretary said he was forcing a by-election to protest against the "insidious" erosion of civil liberties in Britain.

One Labour cabinet minister branded the by-election a "farce" and accused the Tories of being in "disarray" and "
confusion."

And former home secretary David Blunkett dismissed the resignation as a "childish and immature" publicity stunt.

Mr Davis spearheaded the Conservatives' failed bid to defeat the Government over extending detention without charge, which caused disquiet among some Tory MPs.

He said the undermining of civil liberties through moves such as 42-days detention and the introduction of ID cards "cannot go on."

"It must be stopped and for that reason today I feel it is incumbent on me to take a stand," he told reporters outside the Commons.

Aides to Mr Davis had indicated that last night's vote was "do or die," and he had staked a great deal of his credibility on the outcome.

Privately Mr Davis has accepted that many on the Tory benches were uncomfortable about opposing tough law and order measures.

However, he is seen as one of the Shadow Cabinet's best operators, and has claimed the scalps of a succession of Home Secretaries.

His popularity among the Conservative grass roots was demonstrated when he came runner-up to David Cameron for the party leadership in 2005.

Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg said: "David Davis's decision to resign his seat and fight a by-election over the issue of 42 days is a dramatic move. I am grateful to him for having informed me following the vote of his intention to take this step.

"The Liberal Democrats have consistently opposed this unnecessary and illiberal proposal which poses a threat so serious to British liberties that it transcends party politics.

"I have therefore decided, after consultation with the party nationally and locally, that we will not stand a candidate at the forthcoming by-election which will be contested by David Davis solely on this issue."

The Lib Dems had targeted the seat in 2005 as part of its ill-fated "decapitation" strategy to unseat key Tory figures but Mr Davis was re-elected with a 5,116 majority.

Communities Secretary Hazel Blears sought to capitalise on the dramatic resignation.

"The Tories are plainly in disarray and confusion over the serious issue of national security," she said.

"Behind Cameron's facade are the same old Tories fighting like ferrets in a sack.

"This forced by-election is a farce – and an insult to the voters in Haltemprice and Howden."



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 June 2008 2:32 PM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

George Laird,

Glasgow 12/06/2008 13:23:54
Dear All

I don't believe it!

Well done David Davis, by his action he has decided to let the public have their say on the erosion of civil liberties.

After so many MP's were bribed to side with Gordon Brown, there should be an investigation into this farce of 42 days detention.

The DUP were bought off and should be ashamed to stand in the Commons as MP's.

They seem to have forgotten the appalling history of internment that irish people suffered.

I would go as far to say they are traitors.

Yours sincerely

George Laird
The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University
2

John Knox furr First Meenister,

High St, Embra 12/06/2008 13:25:26
Bizarre. He'll get back in without a doubt especially as it appears the Lib Dems stand aside as well (BBS suggests). Perhaps he'd trying to apply pressure to Cameron to make a stand and say he'd repeal it.
3

Busymale,

12/06/2008 13:28:29
A Tory with principles? Surely not?
4

Alan B,

12/06/2008 13:32:12
Is he going to stand again?

Is this a safe tory seat?
5

Anecdotal,

Edinburgh 12/06/2008 13:46:00
If he stands again and wins how can he justify wasting the publics time and money on a meaningless bi-election. Oh I forgot he doesn't care about wasting money as long as he can make some token gesture that the public supports the Tory party on civil liberties. This is the same Tory party who used the police to prevent miners, dockers and builders from exercising their civil liberties. Bah humbug I say.
6

Duncan in Edinburgh,

12/06/2008 13:57:09
I have to say while I agree with the principle which he is trying to promote, this is nothing but a gimmick - and a costly one at that. He knows he will be re-elected, and it will do his public image no harm at all for the future.

I'm not sure that MPs should be so easily able to resign and then stand again for the same seat, just to make a point - no matter how valid the point is.
7

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 12/06/2008 14:24:02
Congratulations to David Davis. At last, a man of principle with the courage to make a stand for what he believes in.

I hope he wins and I hope the government listens.
8

John Knox furr First Meenister,

High St, Embra 12/06/2008 14:26:33
#7 He's an opposition MP! Let's get this right - they lose a vote so they shoudl all then resign and fight their seats? And.. then the Governemnt listens?
9

Daft Old Git,

12/06/2008 14:34:34
Saves the tax payer from paying his wages for a few weeks I suppose. Personally I'm all for locking up bad people, more CCTV, ID cards and DNA database....and I always thought I was a Tory
10

Epicuras,

12/06/2008 15:09:18
Never thought I'd think well of a Tory - still in regard to the police state being created in the UK you really have to look at who started it - and I blame Thatcher
11

Daft Old Git,

12/06/2008 15:15:01
#10
Yes, I'm sure she'd be in favour of 42 days. It's not as though any law abiding person is scared to step outside in case they get locked up for 7 weeks
12

Jam Tarts 1874,

On the Rebound 12/06/2008 15:20:09
#1. What evidence do you have that the DUP were "bought off"? The DUP have denied your accusation, but I suppose that won't stop you, it's all a conspiracy to you anyway, isn't it?

Who was being bribed? Again, some evidence please. The bribery appeared to be from the tory whips who were getting their members to vote against the Government just for the sake of opposition, many of the tory MPs would privately welcome even more time to keep suspects locked up.

I have human rights too, I deserve not to be put a risk by the likes of you and all the other screwballs on the edge of society that we seem to be expected to pander to.

Go and ask the families of the 7/7 victims what they think about giving the police extra time to gather further evidence. All the opinion polls showed a clear majority of not just tory party members, but people in the UK want the police to have these extra days. People like you fill you head with garbage and rage against the state and authority at every oportunity, however you are happy to wallow in the benefits provided by society.

It is the old addage, if you have done nothing wrong then you will have nothing to fear.
13

Urban Guerrilla,

Edinburgh 12/06/2008 15:48:59
#13, > It is the old addage, if you have done nothing wrong then you will have nothing to fear. <

Of course. There have never ever been such things as miscarriages of justice, have there?
14

gorgeousgorgieboy,

Edinburgh 12/06/2008 16:35:07
He'll have plenty of time now to cruise Hampstead Heath.
15

Duncan in Edinburgh,

12/06/2008 17:08:21
#16 Actually I suspect he isn't.
16

Micropacer,

12/06/2008 19:11:11
Jam Tarts 1874 your so far off the mark its scary.

How many times have the Police got near the current 28 day limit?

Shall I answer that for you?

None. 28 days isnt needed then 42 certainly isnt.

This is all about Brown taking the Countries eyes off the continual cck ups he has been making with things like the 10p tax band. Brown isnt very clever but this has been a very good political move on his part but the rest of us pay the cost.
17

walter,

12/06/2008 19:11:26
#5 This is the same Tory party who used the police to prevent miners, dockers and builders from exercising their civil liberties.

What civil liberties where these people exercising that the police were used to prevent.
It would not be that well known civil liberty that says if you are on strike then you can prevent others who are not on strike from going to work and use intimidation and force if need be would it.
18

Willie,

12/06/2008 21:48:23
Given his majority a totally pointless exercise.
He would have had more credibility if he had taken a stand against his colleagues claiming public funds for going to their sons wedding, or paying for childcare, or paying family for doubtful services, but no not worthy of a stand.
Worried about our freedoms??
I'm more worried at getting blown up by terrorists.
19

Diggins,

12/06/2008 22:09:35
#12 Methalions,

"Bottler Brown" fight an election?

If he orders his minions not to, we can put up a "fakie" candidate.

Gordon Brown - Nu Labour Britain is Best Party.
20

Smasher,

13/06/2008 08:34:02
They should get the winner from big brother, X factor or some other brain dead show to stand against him. The chances are in Britain 2008 they'd beat him. Judging by some recent events they'd probably do a better job than these self satisfying, public ignoring, expenses grabing, family employing, document losing idiots currently running this country into the ground.
21

Douglas,

Bathgate 13/06/2008 12:13:47
Sorry, I didn't get past the 'childish and immature' quote from Blunkett before wetting myself.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.