Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Wednesday, 4th November 2009 Change Date Latest Issue

Crumbling Meadowbank 'at risk of permanent closure'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 28 March 2009
CRUMBLING Meadowbank Stadium is at risk of being closed down permanently with no money to re-open it, councillors have been warned.
A new report says an interim council investment of £1.45 million – designed to keep the facility ticking over for the next few years – is not enough to rule out a complete failure of its ageing electrical and mechanical systems.

The money to be invested, which was agreed by councillors in February's budget, will help keep Meadowbank in an operational state in the interim, but it will remain at constant risk of closure until "a more substantial level of refurbishment" is carried out.

The new report, by the city's director of corporate services, Jim Inch, has raised fresh fears that the council will not be able to keep the facility going until a replacement is built.

Council chiefs were forced to delay plans to build a new £25m sports centre after it was revealed in November 2008 that the land being sold to fund the majority of the project would only fetch £5m rather than the expected £17m.

Bill Walker, the City of Edinburgh Athletics Club's chief coach and member of the Save Meadowbank Campaign, said: "This amount of money would be OK if it was for one year. But as it is, it's just a sticking plaster.

"At the moment the track isn't really fit for competition. They are apparently going to patch it up just now and in August are going to re-lay the top surface, and that's going to take up most of the money.

"I think it's going to be eight to ten years before we get anything new at Meadowbank and at the moment we are just getting by."

Labour group leader Councillor Andrew Burns added: "Whilst the money that has been allocated to immediate repairs and maintenance is to be welcomed, it's only a short-term solution and longer term prospects for Meadowbank need to be decided upon."

The interim £1.45m investment will pay for "essential works" to be carried out between now and 2012. These include repairs to the structure of the buildings and resurfacing of the internal and external athletics track.

In his report, Mr Inch warned: "Building component failure, however, remains a possibility without a complete refurbishment of the building, including the full replacement of mechanical and electrical services. In the absence of a more substantial level of refurbishment, a risk of failure of an essential element of the building remains, for which there is no current budget provision."

City sports leader Deidre Brock said: "It's an inescapable fact that Meadowbank is nearing the end of its life, but this interim investment will help to keep the facility open and operational until the city is in a better financial position to start the new development."

What should be done about Meadowbank?

Clare Morley, 30, civil servant, Duddingston Park: "I think sports facilities are pretty appalling, and it would be dreadful to lose Meadowbank. There's nothing else on this side of town."

John Gray, 54, estate agent, Stenhouse Drive: "I think, in these times, spending money on schools should be a bigger priority. Meadowbank is becoming a bit of a white elephant and I don't think it would be hugely missed."

Jennifer Hutton, 51, personnel manager, Dundas Street: "People always economise on maintenance and now they are left with a huge repair bill. I think they need to find the money somewhere."


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 28 March 2009 10:43 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Architecture , Meadowbank
 
1

radge dug,

28/03/2009 10:42:30
Meadowbank is a dump. And it has been for years. A decade or more of Labour rule at local, Scottish and London level has seen it decline.

Perhaps London Labour, in these cash-strapped times, could divert some money away from illegal wars and nuke weapons towards this useful public service?
2

alfonsa pedrosa,

embra 28/03/2009 12:10:07
Good,flatten it and build a new sports centre,or flats.
3

PaulB,

Edinburgh 28/03/2009 13:03:19
This is a disgrace - lack of investment over many years. No wonder there are so many obese people in Edinburgh. Of course once the economy improves it will be sold off to make way for more 'luxury flats'.
4

Mallory,

Edinburgh 28/03/2009 13:23:10
How convenient for the Council who presumably will still plan to sell off the land..
5

im brian and so is my wife,

edinburgh 28/03/2009 16:24:34
well councilor burns,what about the waste of cash,you did by raising questions at the council,which would have been done on 1 phone call
also i wouldnt trust him as far as i could throw him at meadowbank
http://www.edinburghsucks.com/2007/09/23/local-councillors-get-a-job/
6

Skinnybob,

28/03/2009 18:09:02
While it's good to see the words 'council' and 'complete failure' in the same sentence it's not quite the story hoped for.
7

Marian,

28/03/2009 18:11:21
This is another example of the failure of 50 years of municipal socialism in Scotland to look after the nations assets.

Proper maintenance and repair of our council housing, schools, play parks, and our roads and pavements have been neglected for decades under Labour whilst at the same time they wasted our taxes on funding thinly disguised groups of their supporters at local level, junkets and overseas trips for themselves, and other grandiose schemes.
8

MikeN,

Edinburgh 28/03/2009 20:41:10
#5 - The only stadium you've listed that belongs to the City of Edinburgh is Meadowbank. Easter Rd, Tynecastle and Murrayfield are all privately owned and maintained.

Hampden Park is used regularly - it's the home ground of Queens Park FC.
9

MikeN,

Edinburgh 28/03/2009 21:31:59
#5 - Meadowbank was built as a major stadium with an international running track and a sports hall. It was the first in the world with an all weather track and an electronic scoreboard. It enjoyed a lot of use for several years and nearly established itself as a major European athletics venue. Its downfall was the prevailing wind which is almost permanently above the permissible level and so records ccould rarely be set.

If Hibs and Hearts had not owned there own grounds they would almost certainly have gone to the wall years ago. It's the value of those sites which have given both clubs their 'credit worthiness' and helped them to survive.

Are you suggesting that Edinburgh tax payers should be providing stadium facilities for Hearts, Hibs and the SRU?
10

radge dug,

28/03/2009 22:03:52
Labour group leader Councillor Andrew Burns

Is this the same Burns who previously wanted to sell Mbank off?

Does he think we're all stupid?
11

Mcewans 80/-,

Elk 28/03/2009 22:30:08
Flatten it and build a boat.
12

thaijambo,

28/03/2009 23:30:09
#11 Check out the facts please before you engage your brain. The value of the land sold to HMFC was indepenently valued and certainly not "sold on the cheap" as you state. All the proof of this is widely available but let's not let the facts get in the way of your prejudice.
By the way, many of the biggest and most successfull football teams in the world share stadiums which they rent from the local council.
13

thaijambo,

28/03/2009 23:33:26
My reply #15 was meant for #13.
14

Beachcomber,

Edinburgh 28/03/2009 23:53:35
From the opinion page..

http://news.scotsman.com/opinion/Meadowbank-on-the-brink.5118869.jp
15

daywalker,

west edinburgh 28/03/2009 23:54:03
Meadowbank Stadium is in need off over repair but its history has trained a lot off scots too the olimpcs threw it`s years must be somit 2 salvige from its name?????
16

me150,

29/03/2009 02:53:55
Wait a minute you, obvious, SNP supprters. This is NOT as a result of underinvestment by the Labour Party. They had arranged the demolition of this years ago with a new centre to be built but the SNP stopped this when they gained power. Yet another folly by the SNP then, is it not?????

At the time it was obvious that the SNP were no good at arithmetic as they said they saved Edinburgh money when it was easy to see that they actually ended up costing Edinburgh in excess of £25m, the figure might not be exact as I am relying on my bad memory but the amount was substantial.

Now this story only compounds the useless SNP decisions!!
17

me150,

29/03/2009 11:11:43
#20

Correct!!

So where was the money to come from to carry out all these works you have identified?

Higher council tax
local income tax.......where???

All you hear about is how we are overtaxed, so where does it come from??

Lqabour were taking effective action to deal with this and the SNP mothballed the lot and cost Edinburgh a small fortune.

So your points are totally invalid.
18

me150,

29/03/2009 16:53:22
#22

Progress!!

Other projects need to be undertaken. I am not suggesting that there were no errors made but in this instance, Meadowbank, the loss of about £25m would not have happened and in fact a profit from the sales of Meadowbank and others would have increased the coffers by about £90m, if memory serves me correctly.

Political parties, being what they are and regardless of who they are, will always make mistakes. In this case the mistake is that of the SNP.
19

me150,

29/03/2009 18:58:41
Yes and the SNP have only had 2 years and see what they have wasted. I dare to think how bad it will be after a long term in power should that ever happen.
20

ag1957,

Edinburgh 29/03/2009 22:28:36
I find it incredible that due to the lack of investment in leisure facilities and schools we are left with crumbling buildings. When are the council going to realise that the longer you neglect these facilities, the costlier it is going to be to repair in the long run. If the council properly maintained these buildings then they would last longer. After all the majority of homeowners look after and maintain their properties. How many privately owned homes have to be demolished due to lack of neglect and maintenance?
21

Julian.,

edinburgh 29/03/2009 23:38:35
#23 me150,

Yes, money could have been raised but you forgot to mention the family silver that would have been lost:-

Acres of public land lost in the centre of Edinburgh to build "luxury flats" and acres of green space in Sighthill lost to build the stadium. I've got an idea. Why don't we just sell Princes Street gardens..would bring in millions.
22

jamtart,

Beechboro Western Australia 30/03/2009 08:39:16
They ruined a good speedway stadium for this place.

shame,shame shame.

MON THE JT'S
23

Peter - very disappointed/concerned,

Edinburgh 30/03/2009 10:07:02
Edinburgh City Councillors?

They couldn't manage a booze-up in a brewery with free beer.

Still, we're getting trams whatever else, not to mention excessive Council Tax for living in this dump!!
24

me150,

30/03/2009 11:08:04
Ok then, le's double the council tax or introduce a 20% local income tax to pay for everything shall we???

The best and safest option was the one the SNP disposed of when they took over.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.