Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Endinburgh Council
 
 
Wednesday, 4th November 2009 Change Date Latest Issue

Bank of England gets licence to print cash

Move announced as part of bailout while RBS shares decline

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 January 2009
THE Treasury has given the Bank of England the power to print new money as an "unconventional weapon" to tackle the recession.
The move, announced as part of the wider banking bailout, came as fears grew that the financial crisis could see the Royal Bank of Scotland nationalised "within days" after it announced it would unveil the biggest losses in corporate history.

News of the expected £28 billion losses from RBS saw a further £9bn wiped off its value yesterday, as its shares plunged 66 per cent to just 11.6p.

The shockwave from the announcement threatened to derail the Government's second banking bail-out, with the newly created Lloyds Banking Group – formed by the takeover of the Halifax Bank of Scotland by Lloyds TSB – seeing more than a third wiped off its value on its first day of trading on the Stock Market.

Shares in the country's biggest bank fell almost 34 per cent and while the company insisted its capital position remained robust, analysts said they were cautious about the bank's prospects.

The group is already 43 per cent owned by the Government and a city source said it was impossible to rule out further cash injections.

Barclays and HSBC were also hit by heavy share losses yesterday.

The share collapse came just hours after Prime Minister Gordon Brown and Chancellor Alistair Darling had unveiled a further rescue package for British banks that could see an additional £350bn of taxpayers money pumped into the system, on top of the £500bn announced last October.

The main aims of the deal are to provide £200bn insurance for banks against "toxic" debts, which could see the Government taking shares in more banks.

The deal will also force banks to agree to increase new lending, with the Government trying to free-up the money markets to help keep businesses afloat.

Concerns were raised about how the Government would pay for the bail-out however, and some clues to that may have emerged in the announcement from the treasury.

It stated that the Bank of England would set up a new facility, allowing it to buy up to £50bn of high-quality corporate assets, including corporate bonds and commercial paper, that could also be used to boost the supply of money.

This would only be done "should the monetary policy committee conclude that this would be a useful additional tool for meeting the inflation target", and the MPC are understood to be considering the move.

The policy of printing money, also known as "quantitative easing", is a dangerous one however – most recently it has led to hyperinflation in Zimbabwe, which earlier this month printed the world's first trillion dollar note, worth roughly £20 – and both Bank of England and Treasury officials are extremely cautious about the plan.

Shadow Chancellor George Osborne said it was "the last resort for governments that have run out of other options".


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 January 2009 10:13 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Credit Crunch
 
1

Mallory,

Edinburgh 20/01/2009 11:52:52
Here we go again the IMF cannot be far behind...
2

Langenburger,

20/01/2009 12:50:37
First Brown has devalued the pound without ever asking us.
Now he's up to the old print-money trick.
We'll soon suffer inflationary pressures from the increased price of imports (because we don't make things anymore) but that will be a tory problem.
In the meantime the shops will be busier with us all buying more stuff made in China that we don't need.
3

streetwise,

In the city. 20/01/2009 17:46:51
Just a thought but do you think the new lad that took over a RBS would have taken the job if he thought that they were going to be nationalised,most of his bonuses will come in share options.
4

Marian,

20/01/2009 20:02:07
Quoted from Iain Martin's article “Gordon Brown brings Britain to the edge of bankruptcy” in the Telegraph on 20 January 2009:-

“The country stands on the precipice. We are at risk of utter humiliation, of London becoming a Reykjavik on Thames and Britain going under. Thanks to the arrogance, hubristic strutting and serial incompetence of the Government and a group of bankers, the possibility of national bankruptcy is not unrealistic.

The political impact will be seismic; anger will rage. The haunted looks on the faces of those in supporting roles, such as the Chancellor, suggest they have worked out that a tragedy is unfolding here. Gordon Brown is engaged no longer in a standard battle for re-election; instead he is fighting to avoid going down in history disgraced completely.

This catastrophe happened on his watch, no matter how much he now opportunistically beats up on bankers. He turned on the fountain of cheap money and encouraged the country to swim in it. House prices rose, debt went through the roof and the illusion won elections. Throughout, Brown boasted of the beauty of his regulatory structure, when those in charge of it were failing to ask the most basic questions of financial institutions. The same bankers Brown now claims to be angry with, he once wooed, travelling to the City to give speeches praising their "financial innovation".

Does the Prime Minister realise the likely implications when the country joins the dots? He has never been wild on shouldering blame, so I doubt it. But Brown is a historian. He should know that when a nation has put all its chips on red and the ball lands on black, the person who made the call is responsible. Neville Chamberlain discovered this in May 1940 with the German invasion of France.

We're some way from a similar event. But do not underestimate the gravity of the emergency and potential for disgrace.”
5

Paddi,

20/01/2009 20:51:46
Brown's making things worse, he doesnt know what he's doing and making policy on the hoof.

Where on earth is the Government, there's no one other than Laurel & Hardy saying anything at all??? Sorry, other than Harriden talking about fiddling their expenses as Rome burns.

Incredible

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.