Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 6th September 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Number killed and hurt on Capital's roads falls by 8%



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 June 2008
THE number of people killed or injured in road accidents in the Capital fell by more than eight per cent last year, new figures showed today.
And the statistics show an even stronger underlying downward trend in the number of casualties, with the average for 2003-07 more than 28 per cent down on the average for 1994-98.

There were six people killed on Edinburgh's roads last year, compar
ed with 13 in 2006, while fatal and serious casualties were 193 last year, compared to 218 in 2006. Total casualties were 1592 last year, compared with 1736 in 2006.

The figures are in line with a national fall in road accident casualties, down by seven per cent to the lowest figure since 1950. Across Scotland there were 282 fatalities, 32 fewer than 2006, and 2316 seriously injured, 310 fewer than 2006.

Transport Minister Stewart Stevenson welcomed the fall, but said that the Scottish Government would not be complacent and would continue to do all it can to reduce accidents even further.

He said: "It is clear that we can all do more to get our road safety messages across to people of all ages and all driving abilities.

"Road fatalities may be at their lowest level for more than 50 years, but 282 people dying on our roads in Scotland is still 282 too many.

"The Scottish Government wants to do all we can to reduce that number even further and stop the heartache being experienced by too many families across the country.

"We are currently working with some of the leading thinkers on road safety from across Scotland and Europe to help inform a new Road Safety Strategy for Scotland which will be published later this year."

He said he also welcomed the UK Department for Transport's consultation on plans to change the driver training and testing regime.

"Legislative change and updating the driver testing system will be important tools in our efforts to reduce accidents. Meanwhile, I would urge drivers to heed the warnings, not to be complacent, and to drive safely."

The underlying downward trend in casualties saw the number of people killed on injured fall from an average of 2392 in 1994-98 to 1715 in 2003-07. Average fatalities halved from 18 to nine.

The decline in casualties was mirrored in a decrease in the number of accidents in the Capital – down by 7.6 per cent from 1444 in 2006 to 1333 last year.

And the trend showed a 27.8 per cent drop from an average of 1995 accidents in Edinburgh in 1994-98 to an average 1439 in 2003-07.





The full article contains 448 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

 
1

Iggy Iguana,

30/06/2008 15:11:24
Is this not just because the traffic in Edinburgh is moving slower, if atall, with all the road works that have sprung up?
2

I love to eat Sellotape,

30/06/2008 15:30:41
No, it's down to speed cameras.

Doh!
3

alex paterson,

edinburgh 30/06/2008 16:00:46
This is good if its true and not down to traffic jams.
4

Professor22,

lochgelly 30/06/2008 16:02:07
Yes

because speed cameras can stop uninsured and drunk drivers.
5

I love to eat Sellotape,

30/06/2008 16:05:23
Yes, I know. They're great, aren't they?
6

Iain Bhern,

30/06/2008 16:20:02
#4, what utter rubbish. Do you even know how speed cameras work? How is a still photograph going to tell the police that the driver was drunk? At best they can identify a vehicle that does not have a valid tax disc and then only if the camera is triggered by the car speeding.
7

Hector the Red,

30/06/2008 16:26:48
However, bus related accidents are up! Wait for the first person to get run over by the trams....progress!
8

Skint and Appalled,

on top of Old Smokey 30/06/2008 16:27:12
OMG #6 - I think the Professor was being a tad sarcastic - LOL
9

Iain Bhern,

30/06/2008 16:32:10
#8 I think he's just using an alias. His real name is probably R. Soul
10

Douglas,

Bathgate 30/06/2008 17:09:21
Is your local called The Anaemic Radge?
11

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 30/06/2008 17:16:20
#6:

You have just quoted chapter and verse, one of the arguements against the revenue earning devices.

Is it not a strange co-incidence that only last week this paper was reporting that people were using their cars less. Now we hear that there are less crashes. Oh what a surprise. How unusual.

Of course, the underlying figure that actually has meaning is the the one comprising crashes DIVIDED BY the number of million vehicle miles travelled. I believe that this has actually been steadily rising on a UK-wide basis since... guess when? When labour went mad with speed cameras and inane propaganda, that's when.
12

The Geniune Mario Antionette,

30/06/2008 19:17:59
The drop in these figures is only because the public can't get through to the police call centre to report such incidents
13

tumshie heid,

30/06/2008 19:28:04
#9
WHOOSH... as the irony and sarcasm of prof 22's post flys right over your head!
14

Professor22,

lochgelly 30/06/2008 20:30:34
For those with IQs in single digits,

Yes, I was being sarcastic

Duhhhhhhhhhhh!
15

Professor22,

lochgelly 30/06/2008 20:32:36
#9

No, my real name is Professor22. I changed to that in deed poll.

NO!

I am being sarcastic again......

Of course its an alias you retard
16

Professor22,

lochgelly 30/06/2008 20:39:18
Being serious for a moment....

The ANPR cameras can, in fact, detect uninsured, unmoted or untaxed vehicles.

A speed camera (either the Gatso, Truvelo, or laser LTI 2020 (you might as well google no 9) either takes photographs or video evidence, usually primary or secondary evidence if required (again,look it up no 9).

The purpose of photos from Gatsos is to provide evidence of the act of speeding against a gradient of known lines. In the case of the LTI, a photograph is taken during the video footage AFTER the initial speeding photograph has taken place. The purpose of the second photograph is to identify the driver. Photos from backward facing gatsos do not detect the identity of the driver. It can, perhaps, tell you if you are going bald.

But in reality, people are still dying out on the road. Not because of speed but more likely out of stupidity or bad driving.

Better roadcraft for all!
17

is it me?,

Edinburgh 30/06/2008 22:23:50
I think speed cameras are great. I'm in a competition.
Another three points and I get a bike.
18

Julian.,

edinburgh 30/06/2008 22:32:34
Can anyone tell me what the difference between a fatal casualty and a death on the roads is?
19

Clen Peapus,

Edinburgh 30/06/2008 22:46:50
The reduction in accidents is probably helped by the council's anti-roundabout policy and their other efforts at reducing traffic flow. They seem determined to scrape up every roundabout to be replaced by traffic lights e.g. King's Road, Milton Road.

Which in itself isn't terrible, however the timings and sequences of the traffic lights replacing them leave a lot to be desired. Many junctions are now set up to prevent traffic turning right across oncoming traffic. We seem to get more and more dedicated right-turn filter lanes, which might make sense on busy roads like Queen Street, but when attempting to exit the docks from Constitution Street it makes little sense. Particularly as most traffic goes straight over or turns left onto Baltic Street. All that is achieved is a long tailback and an empty lane.

The sequence at Milton Road/Milton Link isn't great either, it appears, from the handful of occasions I've been through it, that traffic from only one approach gets through at a time - no two-way traffic. What's this all about?

If the council has evidence that drivers cannot cope with right-turns and roundabouts then it should urgently contact the Driving Standards Agency to raise these concerns. Clearly if this is the case then the DSA should review the current driving test; if not then the council should come clean: they are restricting traffic flow to build a business case for the tram line and potential future public transport projects.
20

jimb4abobor2,

Edinburgh 30/06/2008 23:25:43
road deaths down could only be one or many thing? the fall in deaths could be due to the smoking-ban ,traffic-jams ,no contact with a police station due to long delays in calls been answered ,cctv or the high increase in fuel prices or roadworks bringing scottish road network to a grinding halt. cant think on any normal problems for this except maybe another manipulation of target figures buy human intervention
21

Iain Bhern,

30/06/2008 23:47:08
Well prof that's rich. The retard is the one not brave enough to use a real name but prefers to hide behind an alias. I really can't understand why people on these forums have to resort to silly names. They obviously don't want the world to know just how incredibly cretinous they can be sometimes. And for your information sarcasm in print only works if it's been appropriately punctuated, a couple of these would have made a world of difference !! If I'm a retard I dread to think what that makes you as my intellectual inferior!
22

Richard Lionheart,

30/06/2008 23:51:12
Clearly these figures do not include those suffering irreversible and debilitating back injuries resulting from the introduction of Road Humps.

The figures collected should be updated to include these.
23

Iain Bhern,

30/06/2008 23:57:51
In reply to your post #16 I'm perfectly well aware of how Gatso cameras work but remember they capture the registration plate of the vehicle and on that evidence it can be established whether or not the vehicle has vehicle excise duty paid on it or not. I hardly ever drive in Edinburgh now so I can't be 100 percent sure but as far as I know the fixed cameras within the city limits are all the Gatso type. As someone who drives large mileages each year I can tell you that Gatsos are probably the biggest single cause of near misses on the roads. We seem to be little more sensible now and I agree that better roadcraft is needed. I've lost count of the number of times someone in front of me has seen a camera and stood hard on their brakes almost to the point of an emergency stop, usually without a clue that they were actually travelling below the speed limit anyway! and as for the prats on the by-pass who think that if they are doing forty when they pass the average speed cameras but can do 60 in between them they'll be OK, well words fail me!
24

Richard Lionheart,

30/06/2008 23:58:01
#20 or how about the simple fact that accidents;

"An unexpected and undesirable event,especially one resulting in damage injury or death"

are down by 8%.

Next year % accidents may be either up or down.

Increases though are less likely to be reported in this way. That however is not an accident!
25

Iain Bhern,

01/07/2008 00:00:11
#22 ah but the benefits to Kwik Fit are enormous. It's a wonder they aren't sponsoring them !!
26

La5t_minit,

01/07/2008 00:21:18
Everyone has missed the main reason for the drop in road injurys... This so called 'Global Warming' bull sh1t and the stupidity of so called 'Speculators' artificially hiking oil prices to the point of running cars off the road anyway..

Its raining every day so nobody is going out in the stuff to be run over and more people are leaving the car in the garage so obviously there will be less road related injuries.

When will these so called 'reporters' and 'statisticians' actually investigate the facts before they print such drivel and give us something decent to read... like 'Why do farts smell?... Honestly, if intelligence were measured in chocolate they would struggle to fill a Smartie between them.
27

geekpie,

forfar 01/07/2008 09:42:58
It's not that surprising with air-bags and safer design.

What's different in the UK is that the percentage of pedestrian KSI's as a proportion of total road KSI's is higher than most European countries.

Even though, in the rest of northern Europe, far more kids walk or cycle to school.
28

tumshie heid,

01/07/2008 10:10:40
Bhern, whether anyone is using an alias or not it was obvious to everyone but you that the posts were sarcastic. Why not just accept that?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Do you think the council should make taxi drivers wear smarter clothes?
Yes, it makes them look professional
No, they should be comfortable while driving
It doesn’t matter, you don’t see their clothes

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.