Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 17th May 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Edinburgh Evening News site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Nobody rigs prices at pump but drivers caught over a barrel



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

As the cost of petrol continues to soar, Business Editor Michael Blackley reveals that it's not those on the forecourts that are raking in the profits.
IT'S a small world, they say, and these days you can be sure that if one key country suffers a nosebleed, we are all going to have to mop up the mess.

It is a fact being borne out at the moment, with motorists all around the world feeling the stra
in of rising petrol prices, which are mostly down to a few key factors that are pushing up the price of oil – and thus having an impact on every country in the world reliant on vehicles.

This week's record profit figures from oil giants Royal Dutch Shell and BP led to widespread dismay about how the big companies can be making more money than ever before yet not passing any of those profits on to the consumer.

And while in the UK we pay higher taxes on fuel than anywhere else, we are far from alone at expressing dismay at the amount we are having to pay for our fuel.

It was a realisation borne out by a colleague on a recent road trip around the United States. His journey from coast to coast set him back half the cost he expected because the price of petrol was about half what we pay here as a result of lower taxes.

Yet, despite the comparative cost of fuel, he found every local newspaper in every town and city he went through filled with the same fury we see here over rising costs at the petrol pump. There were even huge protests as people took to the streets to demand that something be done.

Despite tax on petrol being nowhere near what we pay here, and prices being a drop in the ocean compared to the UK, they are not happy.

Yet the reasons for the rising cost of petrol in the US are the same as the reasons here: the price of oil has reached record levels. This time last year, a barrel of Brent crude oil was costing somewhere in the region of $61. Earlier this week, it hit an all-time high of $119.

So why is it happening? Oil is a very volatile commodity and its price can be influenced by any number of factors.

There is more demand for oil than ever before, largely driven by the Middle East and Asia. The credit crunch might have been expected to reduce demand, as more motorists look to cut their spending on fuel, but in reality it has made the price higher. Since the Federal Reserve cut US interest rates and central banks pumped billions of dollars into financial markets to ease the crisis, prices for oil and gold have risen.

The value of the dollar has also been tumbling in recent months, cutting the purchasing power of the revenues generated by the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec), and making prices rise. It is also said that the lack of new refining capacity in major consuming nations is also having an impact on price.

Furthermore, there is no question that decades of wars, sanctions and underinvestment has hit Iraq, a key nation in the global oil game.

YET despite all of these factors, since Wednesday, when BP said it generated £3.32 billion of profits in the first quarter and Royal Dutch Shell said it had raked in £3.92bn, the finger of the consumer has been assertively pointed at the oil companies.

There is a belief the kind of growth that these firms are seeing should help ease the amount that the individual motorist is needing to pay at the pump.

But the Petrol Retailers Association says most forecourt retailers are, in fact, selling fuel at a loss. The only way they can break even or make any money is by fully utilising the additional retail space that is usually found at the forecourts, it says.

Ray Holloway, the PRA's director, said: "Most of the sites in the UK branded BP or Shell are actually independent retailers. They work in a challenging business area, with high costs and very low returns. Most are kept afloat by the shop attached to their site.

"For many, these numbers are unsustainable and they are being forced to close in increasing numbers.

"Around 300 filling stations shut down every year, and motorists are now noticing gaps in fuel availability, and if it gets worse as expected, they will certainly be inconvenienced when searching for a forecourt in some areas."

There are around 9200 forecourts in the UK, including supermarket filling stations, which amounts to the lowest number of filling stations since 1912. Since the fuel protests in 2000, one third of the filling stations open at the time have disappeared.

So it is clear that selling fuel is not big business. It would, therefore, be unfair to blame only the oil companies. Stephen Brooks, an analyst at Edinburgh-based energy consultant Wood Mackenzie, said: "It is not BP or Shell that sets the international commodity prices for crude oil or the refined products manufactured from it," he said. "It is the market itself that determines the price level.

"For these companies as businesses, their main business is getting a valuable commodity out of the ground so when the market value is high, as it is today, they benefit. But they also have to invest to fund more exploration."

Mr Brooks does not see any real reason to expect the upward pressure on the price of oil to ease, although he admits that if the world was to encounter a global recession then that could have an impact.

"The market is sensitive and the least bit of adverse news can push up the price of oil. So it can be very difficult to call what is going to happen next.

"But if the global economy moved into a significant recession over a long period then you cannot avoid the laws of economics. You would expect to see a downturn in oil price."

All of which means the high price of oil, and the resultant cost of petrol, are here to stay, unless we move into a recession. And if that was to happen, anything that is saved on petrol would more likely than not be lost elsewhere.

Oil is a global commodity, which is in increasingly short supply. What is happening elsewhere in the world is likely to continue to cause an upward pressure on price.

And until we significantly cut our consumption, that is unlikely to change.





The full article contains 1113 words and appears in Edinburgh Evening News newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 May 2008 10:53 AM
  • Source: Edinburgh Evening News
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Transport
 
1

shivago8,

livingston 02/05/2008 11:01:27
And we all sit back on our Glencarses and allow it to happen.
Where is the 1939/45 spirit that we had and won.
The Froggies lost the battle put there guns up for sale as sold as new,hardly used but they would have told there govt what to do with there fuel rise.
We have lost the plot,allowing this labour govt to deposit things on us from away up high.[seagull stuff]
2

hertscot,

02/05/2008 11:08:08
The oil companies make huge profits, but they don't charge too much for their products, that's OK then?
3

sangriaboy,

malaga 02/05/2008 11:28:44
Why do we need to buy oil from the middle east at 124 a barrell when last week it was evident that our oil comes from the north sea?

Answers on a postcard to
the corrupt government
10 downing street
london

4

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 02/05/2008 11:34:14
The price of petrol and diesel in this country has very little to do with oil companies. It has everything to do with the criminally extortionate amount of tax that this tin-pot government levys on it.

Fuel duty should be halved immediately
5

Shanti,

edinburgh 02/05/2008 11:39:25
For the past few years I have been using a litle device on my car called a Motoflow. It's easy to fit and I reckon I get about an extra 40 or so miles per tank of diesel (it works on petrol too). You can get them at http://www.cutgasbills.com Worth a look.
6

me150,

02/05/2008 12:21:31
#1...easy boy watch the heart!!

#2...the oil companies are in the business to make profit. You can't surely say that if it was you running the oil companies that you'd give away your profits. You might say they have too much profit. This could be true but the amount of R&D these guys do is enourmous and must be financed. Not least as it is commonly accepted that oil will run out relatively soon. Perhaps the oil companioes could be taxed mmore to finance research into future energy sources.

#4...Yes cut fuel duty but then what. Road pricing would replace the duty as it has in many other countries. We would be no better off.

#5...That is good thinking. We all, especially the moaners, should invest more of our energy into finding alternatives.
7

Tookie,

Compton 02/05/2008 12:28:18
#2

God forbid companies that invest huge sums of money should get a return on it.
8

Niadh,

Edinburgh 02/05/2008 12:29:54
Here is a novel idea.
How about they get the taxation of the fuel supplies right.
At the moment we pay the cost of the fuel then fuel duty is added and then we are charge VAT on top of all that.

Yes folks that's right we pay a tax on a tax!!
I am sure this must be illegal!?!
If it was changed so that we only payed the VAT on what we actually purchased it would drop the cost per litre by about 10 pence
9

Tookie,

Compton 02/05/2008 12:35:17
#8

Would that really make a difference? Shirley the specific fuel duty would then be jacked up to compensate...
10

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

, Newington 02/05/2008 12:43:12
Fuelhead has his head well protected from the sun as usual. If we took all the tax from petrol, it wouldn't make any difference to the price. The price is where the amount that can be supplied meets the demand for it in Britain. Cut taxes and the price won't drop. The oil companies will simply make more profit.

The basic problem is that more and more Chinese folks become the first ever in their families to own a car. They're therefore quite enthusiastic and willing to pay what it takes to fill the cars with petrol. We have to bid against them for that petrol and the price is where enough folks give up on car usage to bring demand down to supply.

It ain't gonna get any better without a giant world recession.
11

Tookie,

Compton 02/05/2008 12:50:35
#10

It seems to me that you are confusing the price of oil, with the price of petrol at the pumps. In view of your analysis above, can you explain why the pump price in the US is a fraction of that in the UK?
12

Road Raga,

EDINBURGH 02/05/2008 13:04:55
I always laugh at many motorists who moan about the cost of petrol, whilst driving about in their 2 ton 4x4s or 2.5 litre sports cars, probably averaging 20mpg in town.
Petrol too expensive for you ? Buy a smaller car, or even better, walk or cycle on your 1 mile journey instead !
13

Sedov,

Scotland 02/05/2008 13:16:17
The rising cost of fuel is effecting the price and production of food. Food prices have gone up world wide by 75% since 2005 and the effect of the producing bio fuels for cars from maize is also having an effect. Petrol is used for planting,irrigation,fertilising and for harvesting of crops and if farmers cannot afford fuel then production goes down especially in the undeveloped countries. At present 33 countries face unrest because of food price rises and in the meantime Shell and BP are reaping massive profits - you cannot eat money but you can share your wealth for the benefit of mankind. If the oil companies put as much money into the harvesting of maize and rice for the table instead of for cars, then we might be able to help feed the starving of this world - and the same goes for the massive sponsorship of Formula One racing etc. by the oil companies. They might think that no one notices the huge profits - but many are and this could lead to serious unrest.
14

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 02/05/2008 13:18:04
#11:

...or why fuel costs les than 20p per litre in Egypt?

Really Fernando, you have excelled yourself this time! Tax on petrol is over 500%. Simple maths says that if you drop this to a merely extortionate (as opposed to criminally extortionate) 250% then the price paid by the motorist at the pump would just about halve.

Petrol is effectively a waste product in the refining process. It doesn't have much use except as a fuel for internal combustion engines. A far greater percentage of oil is used for other processes and products which are nothing whatsoever to do with the driving of cars.

Road fuel is taxed far too heavily and with the recent oil price rises, the government has seen literally ENORMOUS windfall tax takes. Look at it this way, if the price of the raw product rises by 1p per litre, the government takes an extra 5p per litre without doing anything at all to the rate of duty or tax.

Labour has not only been sitting there raking in all this cash, they have been steadily increasing the rate of duty into the bargain. They need stopping NOW by direct action if necessary.
15

Bien E. Bien,

02/05/2008 13:19:01
I have managed to eke an extra 3mpg out of my car, by changing my 2 air filters and fuel filter, and keeping my tires properly inflated. The car needs 2 air filters as it is a 6.0 litre V12.

I walk whenever I can and only drove 3,000 miles last year. I see little difference between doing very enjoyable 3,000 miles in a car that gives 25mpg, or 6,000 somewhat tedious miles in a car that gives 50mpg.
16

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 02/05/2008 13:21:50
Sedov,

There is plenty of food in the world for everyone. No problem.

The problem is the distribution of food and always has been.
17

Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 02/05/2008 13:26:00
#15:

What make of car is it? I had a 6.0 Jag once and dispite keeping it immaculately maintained, I rarely saw anything like 25mpg.

Strangely enough, last time a drove a small, "eco-friendly" petrol powered car, I could not achienve more than 30mpg. Likewise with a diesel Volvo, so the fuel consumption might be something to do with my lead foot!
18

hertscot,

02/05/2008 13:28:04
6&7,

I have no problem with private companies getting a return on investment, but £1,000,000,000 a month is profiteering and they have the power to reduce the price, just as the government has the power to reduce the tax. But, let's face it, once we are used to the high price it will never reduce significantly, and as oil runs out it will continue to increase. We will be screwed from now on.
Alternative (High Octane) Fuel Head,Edinburgh - don't always agree with your stance but it's nice to see some passion, I'm off now to hit the road in my 3.5 Alfa.
19

A Friend of Fernando Poo,

, Newington 02/05/2008 13:29:40
#11: Fair point. You might be right.

20

The Geniune Mario Antionette,

02/05/2008 13:32:27
Who cares who's raking in the profit. We'll meekly pay whatever is asked.
21

John Blackley,

Florida 02/05/2008 13:43:13
"since Wednesday, ...... the finger of the consumer has been assertively pointed at the oil companies."

Because the average consumer - as evidenced by comments pages like The Scotsman's - is too lazy, too prejudiced or too comfortable to work out for themselves who or what is causing the rise in oil prices. Learning's hard. Writing comments online at The Scotsman and bawling, "It's all the oil companies' fault" is easy.
22

,

02/05/2008 13:44:10
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
23

Sedov,

Scotland 02/05/2008 13:55:26
#16 Alternative - I agree thatthe distribution of food under capitalism is organised for profit and not need against a planned society where needs come before profit and this causes shortages. However, over the past ten years other factors are are now actually causing real shortages. Productivity of food has dropped from 2.2% world wide to 1%- this against the situation in China which now needs 60kg of meat per person compared with 4 kg in 1962. China is now importing rice! However it takes 7kg of food to produce 1 kg of beef which in turn now needs much more water than before because of intensive farming. The UN food programme needs an extra $500 m per year on top of $3.4bn to meet its programme of feeding 73 million of most needy. Small farmers are now struggling to get loans from banks to meet the demands of the consumers and they are turning away from food production as the credit crunch bites. Scarcity of water is also a factor and multi nationals like coca cola use essential water supplies to make their drink -for profit of course. It takes 27,000 litres of water to make just one T shirt, according to the Observor, 9th Dec 2007. Another factor is global warming and the increase of droughts in australia where farmers are turning to other businesses.
24

Tookie,

Compton 02/05/2008 14:00:41
#18

"I have no problem with private companies getting a return on investment, but £1,000,000,000 a month is profiteering and they have the power to reduce the price, just as the government has the power to reduce the tax."

While I guess the profiteering accusation is subjective, I would be interested in your explanation of how oil companies can reduce the price. Are we talking about the oil price or pump price here? An explanation applicable to either would be interesting.
25

Dragonlord,

02/05/2008 14:48:56
5# you paid £55 for a magnet?

buy it here for £20

http://www.expertverdict.com/ShoppingBasket.aspx?language=en-GB
26

Bien E. Bien,

02/05/2008 15:11:45
#17 - it is a Jaguar that I have here as well - the 6.0 litre XJ12 (or the Daimler Double-Six) saloon. 25mpg is my record on the motorway, with the new filters and a tune up of the cooling system. It is supposedly good for 155mph, though I have yet to test this.

I don't use the car for commuting - I walk to work and just keep the wheels for occasional trips to the supermarket or the golf course. Best to associate driving with pleasure.
27

I love to eat Sellotape,

02/05/2008 15:19:39
"It's a small world, they say ..."

Who is "they"? Who? WHO?
28

hertscot,

02/05/2008 15:45:17
#24 how about a year on year target of 'zero growth' for the companies. because you can be sure that don't spend a billion a month R&D.
But somehow I cannot see any company being allowed to reduce prices while their customers are so easily fleeced and conditioned to ever increasing prices.
and.. just a thought....wouldn't it be better to boycott BP and Shell rather than blockade refineries?
29

Tookie,

Compton 02/05/2008 17:02:14
#28

What sort of company would set a target of "zero growth"? How would BP and Shell selling their products at a discount help reduce the prevailing market rate of both oil as a commodity and pump prices? What form of boycott of BP and Shell could the general public undertake that would have any sort of effect on either price??
30

Dragonlord,

02/05/2008 17:27:25
The point has been made before. The oil comes from the north sea and Scotland should be self-sufficient therefore we should have fuel at the same price other producing countries have it at. Producing countries should be making profit and not pricing their own people out of the market.

Oh and reduce the tax.
31

Paddi,

02/05/2008 18:21:29
70% of the cost of fuel here goes straight into the pocket of the government, yet they still try to insist that it's all because of high crude priceson the intl markets.....
32

hertscot,

02/05/2008 19:38:21
28 Don't use there forecourts!
33

hertscot,

02/05/2008 19:38:37
sorry....their
34

hertscot,

02/05/2008 19:53:30
30 Yes we are a producing country, but it would appear the oil is owned by a private cartel.
35

GBscot,

Idaho Falls 05/05/2008 17:32:38
One must remember that the US gallon is 3.7 litres
compared to the UK's 4.5 litres. How much would the UK gallon be @3.7 litres per gallon?

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Do you think 17 is too young an age to be given a driving licence?
Yes, 17-year-olds are not mature enough to drive
No, but there should be strict conditions on their driving
No, if they can pass the test, they can drive

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.